



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
LMX changed that idea by theorizing that a leader has different relationships with each of their followers.
Typology: Exercises
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
“Even as a hero, sometimes I have to be selfish for those close to me.”
Leader-Member Exchange Theory became the focus of research in the late 1970s. Before the LMX theory, researchers thought of leadership as a process with consistent relationships between a leader and every follower. LMX changed that idea by theorizing that a leader has different relationships with each of their followers. Early research focused on the formation of in-groups and out-groups while later research shifted the focus to how LMX changed organizational effectiveness.
Resources:
Resources:
Resources:
Purpose: Demonstrate the differences and similarities between the in-group and out-group Materials: Paper, hat, blindfolds or shirts Directions: Write ‘friend’ on a third of the paper slips and ‘acquaintance’ on the rest (or other relationships that can be distinguishable between in-group and out-group). Fold them and put these papers in a hat. Have students choose a piece of paper. The ‘acquaintance’ slips refer to the out-group and the ‘friend’ correlates to the in-group. Based off of this, have the in-group members on one side of the room and the out-group on the other. Blindfold the out-group (or tell them to close their eyes) and instruct everyone that they must order themselves in line by height, but they cannot speak. Set a time limit for 90 seconds and then they can begin. The out-group members will have more trouble deciding their line because they cannot see, and will therefore show the added benefit that in-group members have compared to out-group. After the 90 seconds, tell the out-group members that they can take their blindfold off and see the results. The students can then discuss why the in-group had better results than the out-group and how they were put at an advantage. Then, the facilitators will