






























































Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The capabilities required by individual health care organizations, HCCs, jurisdictions, and stakeholders to help patients receive necessary care during emergencies, decrease injuries and illnesses, and promote health care delivery system resilience. It covers the role of various organizations, communication systems, and responder safety and health.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 70
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Activity 4. Assess Community Planning for Children, Pregnant Women, Seniors, Individuals with Access and Functional Needs, Including People with Disabilities, and Others with Unique Needs
Introduction 5
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) leads the country in preparing for, responding to, and recovering from the adverse health effects of emergencies and disasters. This is accomplished by supporting the nation’s ability to withstand adversity, strengthening health and emergency response systems, and enhancing national health security. ASPR’s Hospital Preparedness Program (HPP) enables the health care delivery system to save lives during emergencies and disaster events that exceed the day-to-day capacity and capability of existing health and emergency response systems. HPP is the only source of federal funding for health care delivery system readiness, intended to improve patient outcomes, minimize the need for federal and supplemental state resources during emergencies, and enable rapid recovery. HPP prepares the health care delivery system to save lives through the development of health care coalitions (HCCs) that incentivize diverse and often competitive health care organizations with differing priorities and objectives to work together.
ASPR developed the 2017-2022 Health Care Preparedness and Response Capabilities guidance to describe what the health care delivery system, including HCCs, hospitals, and emergency medical services (EMS), have to do to effectively prepare for and respond to emergencies that impact the public’s health. Each jurisdiction, including emergency management organizations and public health agencies, provides key support to the health care delivery system.
Individual health care organizations, HCCs, jurisdictions, and other stakeholders that develop the capabilities outlined in the 2017-2022 Health Care Preparedness and Response Capabilities document will:
The intended audience for this document is any health care delivery system organization, HCC, or state or local agency that supports the provision of care during emergencies, including but not limited to:
Response Teams (CERT)^1
(^1) “Community Emergency Response Teams.” FEMA , 31 Aug. 2016. Web. Accessed 7 Sept. 2016.
www.fema.gov/community-emergency-response-teams.
and Medical Reserve Corps (MRC)^2
(^2) “Medical Reserve Corps.” MRC, 22 Sept. 2016. Web. Accessed 26 Sept. 2016. https://mrc.hhs.gov.
(^3) “ESRD Networks.” KCER , 2016. Web. Accessed 7 Sept. 2016. http://kcercoalition.com/en/esrd-networks/.
Introduction 7
awardees’ and sub-awardees’ progress toward building the capabilities, in the HPP funding opportunity announcement for the five-year project period that begins in July 2017.
The four Health Care Preparedness and Response Capabilities are:
Capability 1: Foundation for Health Care and Medical Readiness
Goal of Capability 1: The community’s^5
(^5) As the HCC defines in Capability 1, Objective 1, Activity 1 – Define HCC Boundaries
health care organizations and other stakeholders—coordinated through a sustainable HCC—have strong relationships, identify hazards and risks, and prioritize and address gaps through planning, training, exercising, and managing resources.
Capability 2: Health Care and Medical Response Coordination
Goal of Capability 2: Health care organizations, the HCC, their jurisdiction(s), and the ESF-8 lead agency plan and collaborate to share and analyze information, manage and share resources, and coordinate strategies to deliver medical care to all populations during emergencies and planned events.
Capability 3: Continuity of Health Care Service Delivery
Goal of Capability 3: Health care organizations, with support from the HCC and the ESF-8 lead agency, provide uninterrupted, optimal medical care to all populations in the face of damaged or disabled health care infrastructure. Health care workers are well-trained, well-educated, and well-equipped to care for patients during emergencies. Simultaneous response and recovery operations result in a return to normal or, ideally, improved operations.
Capability 4: Medical Surge
Goal of Capability 4: Health care organizations—including hospitals, EMS, and out-of-hospital providers—deliver timely and efficient care to their patients even when the demand for health care services exceeds available supply. The HCC, in collaboration with the ESF-8 lead agency, coordinates information and available resources for its members to maintain conventional surge response. When an emergency overwhelms the HCC’s collective resources, the HCC supports the health care delivery system’s transition to contingency and crisis surge response^6
(^6) Altevogt, Bruce M., et al. “Guidance for Establishing Crisis Standards of Care for Use in Disaster Situations.” The
National Academies Press, 2009. Web. Accessed 26 Oct. 2016. www.nap.edu/read/12749/chapter/1.
and promotes a timely return to conventional standards of care as soon as possible.
These four capabilities were developed based on guidance provided in the 2012 Healthcare Preparedness Capabilities: National Guidance for Healthcare System Preparedness document. They support and cascade from guidance documented in the National Response Framework ,^7
(^7) “National Response Framework.” FEMA , ed. 3, Jun. 2016. PDF. Accessed 24 Aug. 2016. www.fema.gov/media-
library-data/1466014682982-9bcf8245ba4c60c120aa915abe74e15d/National_Response_Framework3rd.pdf. (^8) “National Preparedness Goal.” FEMA , ed. 2. 5 Jul. 2016. PDF. Accessed 26 Oct. 2016.
https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1443799615171- 2aae90be55041740f97e8532fc680d40/National_Preparedness_Goal_2nd_Edition.pdf (^9) “National Health Security Strategy and Implementation Plan.” ASPR, HHS, 2015-2018. PDF. Accessed 26 Oct.
National Preparedness Goal ,^8 and the National Health Security Strategy^9 to build community health resilience and
Introduction 8
integrate health care organizations, emergency management organizations, and public health agencies. See Appendix 1 for more details on the process ASPR followed to revise the capabilities.
HCCs—groups of individual health care and response organizations (e.g., hospitals, EMS, emergency management organizations, public health agencies, etc.) in a defined geographic location—play a critical role in developing health care delivery system preparedness and response capabilities. HCCs serve as multiagency coordination groups that support and integrate with ESF-8 activities in the context of incident command system (ICS) responsibilities. HCCs coordinate activities among health care organizations and other stakeholders in their communities; these entities comprise HCC members that actively contribute to HCC strategic planning, operational planning and response, information sharing, and resource coordination and management. As a result, HCCs collaborate to ensure each member has what it needs to respond to emergencies and planned events, including medical equipment and supplies, real-time information, communication systems, and educated and trained health care personnel.
The value of participating in an HCC is not limited to emergency preparedness and response. Day-to-day benefits^10
(^10) Priest, Chad and Benoit Stryckman. “Identifying Indirect Benefits of Federal Health Care Emergency
Preparedness Grant Funding to Coalitions: A Content Analysis.” Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , vol. 9, no. 6, 2015.
may include:
(^11) “Instructions for Schedule H (Form 990).” IRS , 2015. Web. Accessed 18 Jul. 2016. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-
pdf/i990sh.pdf.
The 2017-2022 Health Care Preparedness and Response Capabilities document is organized into four sections—one for each capability. Each capability has a goal and a set of objectives with associated activities. Definitions of capability goal, objective, and activity are defined below.
The capabilities are a high-level overview of the objectives and activities that the nation’s health care delivery system, including HCCs and individual health care organizations, should undertake to prepare for, respond to, and recover from emergencies. ASPR encourages HCCs, health care organizations, and
Foundation for Health Care and Medical Readiness 10
The foundation for health care and medical readiness enables the health care delivery system and other organizations that contribute to responses to coordinate efforts before, during, and after emergencies; continue operations; and appropriately surge as necessary. This is primarily accomplished through health care coalitions (HCCs) that incentivize diverse and often competitive health care organizations with differing priorities and objectives to work together. HCCs should collaborate with a variety of stakeholders to ensure the community has the necessary medical equipment and supplies, real-time information, communication systems, and trained and educated health care personnel to respond to an emergency. These stakeholders include core HCC members—hospitals, emergency medical services (EMS), emergency management organizations, and public health agencies—additional HCC members, and the Emergency Support Function-8 (ESF-8, Public Health and Medical Services) lead agency. (For more information, see Capability 1, Objective 1, Activity 2 – Identify Health Care Coalition Members.)
Goal for Capability 1: Foundation for Health Care and Medical Readiness
The community’s^13
(^13) As the HCC defines in Capability 1, Objective 1, Activity 1 – Define HCC Boundaries
health care organizations and other stakeholders—coordinated through a sustainable HCC—have strong relationships, identify hazards and risks, and prioritize and address gaps through planning, training, exercising, and managing resources.
e
HCCs should coordinate with their members to facilitate:
HCCs serve as multiagency coordination groups that support and integrate with other ESF-8 activities. Coordination between the HCC and the ESF-8 lead agency can occur in a number of ways. Some HCCs serve as the ESF-8 lead agency for their jurisdiction(s). Others integrate with their ESF-8 lead agency through an identified designee at the jurisdiction’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC) who represents HCC issues and needs and provides timely, efficient, and bi-directional information flow to support situational awareness. (Se Capability 2 – Health Care and Medical Response Coordination for details on ESF-8 and situational awareness.)
HCCs serve as a public-private partnership. As stated in the National Response Framework :
“…private sector organizations contribute to response efforts through partnerships with each level of government….During an incident, key private sector partners should have a direct link to
Foundation for Health Care and Medical Readiness 11
emergency managers and, in some cases, be involved in the decision making process….Private sector entities can assist in delivering the response core capabilities by collaborating with emergency management personnel before an incident occurs to determine what assistance may be necessary and how they can support local emergency management organizations during response operations….”^14
(^14) “National Response Framework.” FEMA , ed. 3, Jun. 2016, pp. 10, 29. PDF. Accessed 24 Aug. 2016.
https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1466014682982- 9bcf8245ba4c60c120aa915abe74e15d/National_Response_Framework3rd.pdf.
The HCC should define its boundaries based on daily health care delivery patterns—including those established by corporate health systems—and organizations within a defined geographic region, such as independent organizations and federal health care facilities. Additionally, the HCC may consider boundaries based on defined catchment areas, such as regional EMS councils, trauma regions, accountable care organizations, emergency management regions, etc. Defined boundaries should encompass more than one of each member type (e.g., hospitals, EMS) to enable coordination and enhance the HCC’s ability to share the load during an emergency. HCC boundaries may span several jurisdictional or political boundaries, and the HCC should coordinate with all ESF-8 lead agencies within its defined boundaries.
The HCC should:
An HCC member is defined as an entity within the HCC’s defined boundaries that actively contributes to HCC strategic planning, identification of gaps and mitigation strategies, operational planning and response, information sharing, and resource coordination and management. In cases where there are multiple entities of an HCC member type, there may be a subcommittee structure that establishes a lead entity to communicate common interests to the HCC (e.g., multiple dialysis centers forming a subcommittee). HCC membership does not begin or end with attending meetings.
The HCC should include a diverse membership to ensure a successful whole community response. If segments of the community are unprepared or not engaged, there is greater risk that the health care delivery system will be overwhelmed. As such, the HCC should liaise with the broader response community on a regular basis (see Introduction for a list of stakeholders). The list is recreated below, delineating core and additional HCC members.
Foundation for Health Care and Medical Readiness 13
The HCC should define and implement a structure and processes to execute activities related to health care delivery system readiness and coordination. The elements of governance include organizational structures, roles and responsibilities, mechanisms to provide guidance and direction, and processes to ensure integration with the ESF-8 lead agency. The HCC should specify how structure, processes, and policies may shift during a response, as opposed to a steady state. HCC members should adopt these elements and be part of regular reviews.
The HCC should document the following information related to its governance:
The HCC should identify and plan for risks, in collaboration with the ESF-8 lead agency, by conducting assessments or using and modifying data from existing assessments for health care readiness purposes. These assessments can determine resource needs and gaps, identify individuals who may require additional assistance before, during, and after an emergency, and highlight applicable regulatory and compliance issues. The HCC and its members may use the information about these risks and needs to inform training and exercises and prioritize strategies to address preparedness and response gaps in the region.
A hazard vulnerability analysis (HVA) is a systematic approach to identifying hazards or risks that are most likely to have an impact on the demand for health care services or the health care delivery system’s ability to provide these services. This assessment may also include estimates of potential injured or ill survivors, fatalities, and post-emergency community needs based on the identified risks.
General principles for the HVA process include but are not limited to the following:
(^19) “ASPR TRACIE Evaluation of Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Tools.” ASPR TRACIE, 19 Jul. 2016. PDF. Accessed 24
Aug. 2016. asprtracie.hhs.gov/documents/tracie-evaluation-of-HVA-tools.pdf.
(^20) “Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment.” FEMA , Mar. 2015. Web. Accessed 19 Jul. 2016.
www.fema.gov/threat-and-hazard-identification-and-risk-assessment.
Foundation for Health Care and Medical Readiness 14
and any public health hazard assessments (e.g., jurisdictional risk assessment). The intent is to ensure completion, share risk assessment results, and minimize duplication of effort
HCC members should perform an assessment to identify the health care resources and services that are vital for continuity of health care delivery during and after an emergency. The HCC should then use this information to identify resources that could be coordinated and shared. This information is critical to uncovering resource vulnerabilities relative to the HVA that could impede the delivery of medical care and health care services during an emergency.
The resource assessment will be different for various HCC member types, but should address resources required to care for all populations during an emergency. The resource assessment should include but is not limited to the following:
A comparison between available resources and current HVA(s) will identify gaps and help prioritize HCC and HCC member activities. Gaps may include a lack of, or inadequate, plans or procedures, staff, equipment and supplies, skills and expertise, services, or any other resources required to respond to an emergency. Just as the resource assessment will be different for different member types, so will efforts to prioritize identified gaps. HCC members should prioritize gaps based on consensus and determine
Foundation for Health Care and Medical Readiness 16
The HCC, in collaboration with the ESF-8 lead agency and state authorities, should assess and identify regulatory compliance requirements that are applicable to day-to-day operations and may play a role in planning for, responding to, and recovering from emergencies.
The HCC should:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) conditions of participation, (including CMS-3178-F Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Emergency Preparedness Requirements for Medicare and Medicaid Participating Providers and Suppliers)^23
(^23) See “Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Emergency Preparedness Requirements for Medicare and Medicaid Participating Providers and Suppliers.” 81 Fed. Reg. 63859_._ (16 Sept. 2016.) Federal Register: The Daily Journal of the United States. Web. Accessed 26 Oct. 2016.
Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)^24
(^24) See “Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA).” CMS , May 2016. Web. Accessed 18 Aug. 2016. https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CLIA/index.html.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule requirements^25
(^25) See “Emergency Situations: Preparedness, Planning, and Response.” HHS , 2016. Web. Accessed 19 Jul. 2016. www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/emergency-preparedness/index.html.
and circumstances when covered entities can disclose protected health information (PHI) without individual authorization including to public health authorities and as directed by laws (e.g., state law)^26
(^26) “HIPAA and Disasters: What Emergency Professionals Need to Know.” ASPR TRACIE , 31 Aug. 2016. PDF. Accessed 21 Oct. 2016. https://asprtracie.hhs.gov/documents/aspr-tracie-hipaa-emergency-fact-sheet.pdf
Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA) requirements^27
(^27) See “Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA).” CMS. 2012. Web. Accessed 19 Jul. 2016. https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EMTALA/.
Licensing and accrediting agencies for hospitals, clinics, laboratories, and blood banks (e.g., Joint Commission,^28
(^28) “Emergency Management Resources
DNV GL – Healthcare^29
(^29) “DNV GL Healthcare
Federal disaster declaration processes^30
(^30) See “The Disaster Declaration Process.” FEMA , 3 Jun. 2016. Web. Accessed 19 Jul. 2016. www.fema.gov/disaster- declaration-process.
, 31
(^31) See “Legal Authority of the Secretary.” ASPR , 2016. Web. Accessed 19 Jul. 2016. www.phe.gov/preparedness/support/secauthority/Pages/default.aspx.
and public health authorities Available federal liability protections for responders (e.g., Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act^32
(^32) See “Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act.” ASPR, Dec. 2015. Web. Accessed 14 Aug. 2016. http://www.phe.gov/preparedness/legal/prepact/pages/default.aspx.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements^33
(^33) See “EPA Laws and Regulations.” EPA , Jun. 2016. Web. Accessed 19 Jul. 2016. www.epa.gov/laws-regulations.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements^34
(^34) See “OSHA laws and regulations.” OSHA , 2016. Web. 19 Jul. 2016. www.osha.gov/law-regs.html.
(e.g., general duty clause, blood-borne pathogen standard)
.” The Joint Commission , 24 Aug. 2016. Web. Accessed 24 Aug. 2016. www.jointcommission.org/emergency_management.aspx.
.” DNV GL Healthcare, 2016. Web. Accessed 19 Jul. 2016. dnvglhealthcare.com/.
Foundation for Health Care and Medical Readiness 17
Scope and breadth of emergency declarations Regulations for health care practitioner licensure, practice standards, reciprocity, scope of practice limitations, and staff-to-patient ratios Legal authorization to allocate personnel, resources, equipment, and supplies among health care organizations Laws governing the conditions under which an individual can be isolated or quarantined Available state liability protections for responders
(^35) See “1135 Waivers.” ASPR, 2 May 2013. Web. Accessed 12 Sept. 2016.
http://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/legal/Pages/1135-waivers.aspx.
) of key regulatory requirements pursuant to emergency declarations Process and implications for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issuance of emergency use authorizations for use of non-approved drugs or devices or use of approved drugs or devices for unapproved uses Legal resources^36
(^36) “Hospital Legal Preparedness: Relevant Resources.” CDC , 20 Apr. 2015. Web. Accessed 19 Jul. 2016.
www.cdc.gov/phlp/publications/topic/hospital.html.
related to hospital legal preparedness, such as the deployment and use of volunteer health practitioners Legal and regulatory issues related to alternate care sites and practices Legal issues regarding population-based interventions, such as mass prophylaxis and vaccination Processes for emergency decision making from state or local legislature
(^37) Altevogt, Bruce M., et al. “Guidance for Establishing Crisis Standards of Care for Use in Disaster Situations.” The
National Academies Press, 2009. Web. Accessed 26 Oct. 2016. www.nap.edu/read/12749/chapter/1.
including the identification of appropriate legal authorities and protections necessary when crisis standards of care are implemented (see Capability 4 – Medical Surge)
The HCC preparedness plan enhances preparedness and risk mitigation through cooperative activities based on common priorities and objectives. In collaboration with the ESF-8 lead agency, the HCC should develop a preparedness plan that includes information collected on hazard vulnerabilities and risks, resources, gaps, needs, and legal and regulatory considerations (as collected in Capability 1, Objective 2, Activities 1-5 above). The HCC preparedness plan should emphasize strategies and tactics that promote communications, information sharing, resource coordination, and operational response planning with HCC members and other stakeholders. The HCC should develop its preparedness plan to include core HCC members and additional HCC members so that, at a minimum, hospitals, EMS, emergency
Foundation for Health Care and Medical Readiness 19
The HCC should assist its health care organization members and other HCC members with National Incident Management System (NIMS)^38
(^38) “NIMS Implementation for Healthcare Organizations Guidance.” ASPR HPP, Jan. 2015. PDF. Accessed 7 Sept.
implementation.
The HCC should:
HCC members should support education and training to address health care preparedness and response gaps identified through strategic planning, development of the HCC preparedness and response plans, or other assessments. Whenever possible, training should be standardized at the HCC level to ensure efficiency and consistency.
The HCC should:
Clinical management (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosives [CBRNE]39,
(^39) “Decontamination Guidance for Chemical Incidents.” HHS, 2016. Web. Accessed 11 Oct. 2016.
https://www.medicalcountermeasures.gov/barda/cbrn/decontamination-guidance-for-chemical-incidents/.
40
(^40) Cibulsky, Susan M., et al. “Patient Decontamination in a Mass Chemical Exposure Incident: National Planning
Guidance for Communities.” HHS, DHS, Dec. 2014. PDF. Accessed 11 Oct. 2016. http://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/responders/Documents/patient-decon-natl-plng-guide.pdf.
, burn, trauma, and other recognized hazards) for all populations Responder safety and health requirements (see Capability 3, Objective 5 – Protect Responders’ Safety and Health) Management of patients in a resource-scarce environment, including the implementation of crisis standards of care
(^41) Browning, Henry W., et al. “Collaborative Healthcare Leadership: A Six-Part Model for Adapting and Thriving
during a Time of Transformative Change.” Center for Creative Leadership , Mar. 2016. PDF. Accessed 7 Sept. 2016. insights.ccl.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/CollaborativeHealthcareLeadership.pdf.
(see Capability 1, Objective 5, Activity 2 – Engage Health Care Executives below)
Foundation for Health Care and Medical Readiness 20
The HCC, in collaboration with its members, should plan and conduct coordinated exercises to assess the health care delivery system’s readiness. The HCC should focus exercises on the outcomes of HVAs and other assessments that identify resource needs and gaps, identify individuals who may require additional assistance before, during, and after an emergency, and highlight applicable regulatory and compliance issues.
The HCC should:
(^42) Lofquist, Daphne, et al. “Households ad Families: 2010.” 2010 Census Briefs, Apr. 2012. PDF. Accessed 26 Aug.
and have unique response needs during emergencies, including special medical equipment and treatment needs and family reunification considerations
(^43) “Health Care Coalition Surge Evaluation Tool.” ASPR, Jun. 2016. Web. Accessed 19 Jul. 2016.
www.phe.gov/Preparedness/planning/hpp/Pages/coaltion-tool.aspx.
including decisions leading to the implementation of crisis standards of care (see Capability 4 – Medical Surge)
Assess the mobilization of beds, personnel, and key resources, including equipment, supplies, and pharmaceuticals
(^44) “Disaster Medical Assistance Team.” ASPR, 25 Sept. 2015. Web. Accessed 15 Sept. 2016.
www.phe.gov/preparedness/responders/ndms/teams/pages/dmat.aspx.