

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A contract is a legally enforceable agreement to do or not to do something. Plaintiff claims that [party] and [party] entered into a contract to [explain.
Typology: Exercises
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
CHARGE 4.10C — Page 1 of 2
CONTRACT (Approved 5/98)
A contract is a legally enforceable agreement to do or not to do
something.
Plaintiff claims that [party] and [party] entered into a contract to [explain
terms alleged]. The defendant claims [explain terms alleged]. To establish that
this contract existed, plaintiff must prove the following:
I will now explain these requirements in greater detail.
CHARGE 4.10C — Page 2 of 2
An acceptance occurs when a party shows intent to agree to an offer. The acceptance may be made by words or conduct. It must be made before the offer is withdrawn or lapses, and it must match the terms of the offer exactly. A proposal to accept an offer on any different terms is not an acceptance of the original offer. If any new or different terms are proposed in response to the offer, the response is not an acceptance but rather a counter-offer. A counter-offer is a new offer by the party making that proposal. The new offer must in turn be agreed to by the party who made the original offer for there to be an acceptance.
(^1) Weichert Co. Realtors v. Ryan, 128 N.J. 427, 435 (1992) (a contract arises from proper
acceptance, and “must be sufficiently definite that the performance to be rendered by each party can be ascertained with reasonable certainty.”); West Caldwell v. Caldwell , 26 N.J. 9, 24-25 (1958); Friedman v. Tappan Development Corp ., 22 N.J. 523, 531 (1956); Leitner v. Braen , 51 N.J. Super. 31, 38-39 (App. Div. 1958).