

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Material Type: Assignment; Professor: Archie; Class: Introduction to Logic; Subject: Philosophy; University: Lander University; Term: Unknown 1989;
Typology: Assignments
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Directions: For each of the following paired statements, (1) state the fact at issue as a question phrased in neutral language, (2) state whether or not there is a disagreement in belief or attitude or both, and (3) tell in general the preferred method for resolving the dispute.
(1) Did Richard Murphy talk about the future prospects of Tri-Magma Corporation? (2) a and b agree in belief toward that issue but disagree in attitude. (3) The method of resolution would be to use some form of rhetoric and persuasion.
(1) Does the critic Susan Donnelly think for herself? (2) a and b agree in belief toward that issue but disagree in attitude. (3) The method of resolution would be to use some form of rhetoric and persuasion.
(1) Did John Webster obtain the score on the GRE he predicted? (2) a and b agree in belief toward that issue but disagree in
attitude. (3) The method of resolution would be to use some form of rhetoric and persuasion.
(1) How much did the people who live in Woodsglen contribute to the Lymphoma Society? (2) a and b agree in belief toward how much was contributed but disagree in attitude at to whether that amount was appropriate for the neighborhood. (3) The method of resolution would be use some form of rhetoric and persuasion.
(1) Does Little Eddie play games in strict accordance with the rules? (2) a and b agree in belief toward that he does not but disagree in attitude as to whether or not that action should be approved. (3) The method of resolution would be to use some form of rhetoric and persuasion.
(1) Did Senator Jenkins talk about the subject at issue? (2) a and b disagree about whether or not he spoke about the matter at issue and disagree in attitude toward Senator Jenkins and the program. (3) The method of resolution would be to find the facts by, for example, viewing a video of Senator Jenkins at that time or interviewing persons who witnessed his actions. After the facts were found, then, if a ’s or b ’s attitude did not change, some form of rhetoric and persuasion could be used to influence attitudes.