Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

6 Questions on Exam 1 - Principles of Microeconomics 1 |, Exams of Microeconomics

Material Type: Exam; Class: Microeconomics 1 - Introduction; Subject: Economics; University: Carleton College; Term: Forever 1989;

Typology: Exams

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 11/30/2009

jcad
jcad 🇺🇸

5

(1)

24 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
EXAM 1 – Principles of Microeconomics
J. Wahl – Winter 2009
Please answer the italicized parts and take the rest of the question as given. Answer the
questions as fully and precisely as you can; I give partial credit. Use the back of the page
if necessary.
1. T/F/U(ncertain) and explain, using economic concepts. Suppose that, by the end
of this century, today’s nations have consolidated into two large countries: Amerika and
Afeurasia. Amerika is better at producing electronics and Afeurasia is better at producing
handicrafts. Therefore, each country should specialize in what it is good at producing.
2. T/F/U and explain, using economic concepts. Ticket scalping forces people to
pay more than they want.
3. T/F/U and explain. A rise in the cost of producing mutton will lower the price of
wool.
4. Amid the continued increases in health care costs, many people have called for
the imposition of price ceilings on prescription drugs. Would the enactment of such a
policy be likely to make consumers better off? Please include a graphical analysis in
your answer.
5. T/F/U and explain, using supply and demand curves in your answer. In years of
bad harvests in medieval England, some charitable rich people bought up all the grain
from grain sellers and then re-sold it to the poor at half the market price. Assuming that
no inventories could be held, no foreign trade occurred, and rich people consumed no
grain themselves, the poor didn’t benefit at all by this charity; only the sellers of grain
were better off.
6. Carl and Ole are the only residents of Northfield. They trade regularly with the
outside world, purchasing caviar and selling handmade sweaters. Demand for caviar by
each is
Carl: q = 150 - 4p + 0.2Y (110) 0=150+110-4p p=
Ole: q = 65 - 3p + 0.1Y (55) 0= 65+55-3p p=
where q is weekly jars of caviar, p is price per jar, and Y is Carl’s and Ole’s joint
income. Currently, Y is $250 per week. 550
a. Sketch the market demand curve for caviar, labeling clearly.
b. Suppose caviar cannot be produced in Northfield, but market supply of caviar is
perfectly horizontal at a world price of $25. What is the equilibrium quantity? Show
your work.
c.. Now suppose Carl and Ole decide to place a tariff on caviar in order to cut their
trade deficit and to fund their expanding foreign aid program. If the tariff is set at $10
per jar, what is the new equilibrium quantity?
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download 6 Questions on Exam 1 - Principles of Microeconomics 1 | and more Exams Microeconomics in PDF only on Docsity!

EXAM 1 – Principles of Microeconomics J. Wahl – Winter 2009 Please answer the italicized parts and take the rest of the question as given. Answer the questions as fully and precisely as you can; I give partial credit. Use the back of the page if necessary.

1. T/F/U(ncertain) and explain, using economic concepts. Suppose that, by the end of this century, today’s nations have consolidated into two large countries: Amerika and Afeurasia. Amerika is better at producing electronics and Afeurasia is better at producing handicrafts. _Therefore, each country should specialize in what it is good at producing.

  1. T/F/U and explain, using economic concepts. Ticket scalping forces people to pay more than they want._
  2. T/F/U and explain. A rise in the cost of producing mutton will lower the price of wool.
  3. Amid the continued increases in health care costs, many people have called for the imposition of price ceilings on prescription drugs. Would the enactment of such a policy be likely to make consumers better off? Please include a graphical analysis in your answer.
  4. T/F/U and explain, using supply and demand curves in your answer. In years of bad harvests in medieval England, some charitable rich people bought up all the grain from grain sellers and then re-sold it to the poor at half the market price. Assuming that no inventories could be held, no foreign trade occurred, and rich people consumed no grain themselves, th e poor didn’t benefit at all by this charity; only the sellers of grain were better off.
  5. Carl and Ole are the only residents of Northfield. They trade regularly with the outside world, purchasing caviar and selling handmade sweaters. Demand for caviar by each is Carl: q = 150 - 4p + 0.2Y (110) 0=150+110-4p p= Ole: q = 65 - 3p + 0.1Y (55) 0= 65+55-3p p= where q is weekly jars of caviar, p is price per jar, and Y is Carl’s and Ole’s joint income. Currently, Y is $250 per week. 550 a. Sketch the market demand curve for caviar, labeling clearly. b. Suppose caviar cannot be produced in Northfield, but market supply of caviar is perfectly horizontal at a world price of $25. What is the equilibrium quantity? Show your work. c.. Now suppose Carl and Ole decide to place a tariff on caviar in order to cut their trade deficit and to fund their expanding foreign aid program. If the tariff is set at $ per jar, what is the new equilibrium quantity?

d. Carl and Ole keep the tariff of $10 per jar. But, instead of devoting all tariff revenue to foreign aid, Carl and Ole now decide to use some funds to increase domestic social spending. As a result, their joint income increases to $550. What is the new equilibrium quantity of caviar under this assumption?

  1. The 1984 National Organ Transplantation Act prohibits the sale of human organs for transplant. Each year, 8000 kidneys are donated. Economists estimate that without the legal prohibition on sale the annual supply function for human kidneys for transplant is q = 8000 + 0.2p whereas the annual demand for transplanted kidneys is q = 16000 - 0.2p. (Note that q = quantity and p=price.) 8000+.2p=16000-.2p .4p=8000 p= 20, q= 12, a. If the 1984 act were repealed and kidneys were freely bought and sold, what would the equilibrium price and quantity of kidneys be? Please use a graph to show your answer. b. By prohibiting kidney sales, how much annual surplus is lost by the actual 8000 kidney donors (or their families)? How much annual surplus is lost by individuals (or their families) who would sell kidneys at the equilibrium price but who do not donate them? What is the overall loss of annual surplus that results from the 1984 law? Indicate clearly any relevant areas on your graph. c. Suppose dialysis patients and their families know they will get nowhere if they advocate a repeal of the 1984 law; instead, they embark upon an advertising campaign designed to encourage more people to donate kidneys. What is the maximum they would be willing to pay each year for such a campaign? Explain.