

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The regression analysis results for econ 209 students, including the interpretation of coefficients for variables such as interest rate, money stock, education level, and marriage status on wage. It also includes predictions for wage based on different education levels and marital status.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 32 ---------+------------------------------ F( 2, 29) = 8. Model | 1.61417643 2 .807088215 Prob > F = 0. Residual | 2.81646021 29 .097119318 R-squared = 0. ---------+------------------------------ Adj R-squared = 0. Total | 4.43063664 31 .142923763 Root MSE =.
lnr | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] ---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------- lnm | -1.960497 .5225924 -3.751 0.001 -3.029318 -. lny | 5.319644 1.341171 3.966 0.000 2.576642 8. _cons | -29.95116 7.923452 -3.780 0.001 -46.15644 -13.
a) How would you interpret the coefficient of lny, of lnm. b) A 10% increase in the money stock would lead to what predicted change in r.
wage | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- ed | .7504489 .0787299 9.53 0.000 .5957892. _cons | -.7459421 1.045404 -0.71 0.476 -2.799568 1.
a) How would you interpret the coefficient of ed b) What would you predict for the wage for a person with 14 years of ed.
lnwage | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- ed | .0767605 .0080906 9.49 0.000 .0608671. _cons | 1.059858 .1074298 9.87 0.000 .8488189 1.
a) How would you interpret the coefficient of ed b) What would you predict for the wage for a person with 14 years of ed.
Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 534 -------------+------------------------------ F( 4, 529) = 39. Model | 34.0674714 4 8.51686785 Prob > F = 0. Residual | 114.374424 529 .21620874 R-squared = 0. -------------+------------------------------ Adj R-squared = 0. Total | 148.441895 533 .278502617 Root MSE =.
lnwage | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- ed | .0768516 .007714 9.96 0.000 .0616978. married | .2868351 .0573656 5.00 0.000 .1741428. female | -.063109 .0689404 -0.92 0.360 -.1985395. marfe | -.2601734 .0851219 -3.06 0.002 -.4273917 -. _cons | .9785543 .1103712 8.87 0.000 .7617347 1.
. test female married F( 2, 529) = 21.79 Prob > F = 0. . test female married marfe F( 3, 529) = 19.40 Prob > F = 0. . test female marfe F( 2, 529) = 21.44 Prob > F = 0. . test married marfe F( 2, 529) = 12.59 Prob > F = 0. . test married+ marfe=0 F( 1, 529) = 0.18 Prob > F = 0. . test female +marfe=0 F( 1, 529) = 42.04 Prob > F = 0. . test female+ married+ marfe=0 F( 1, 529) = 0.38 Prob > F = 0. . test female + married=0 F( 1, 529) = 4.06 Prob > F = 0. . test female = married F( 1, 529) = 32.56 Prob > F = 0.
a) Write the predicted equation for a single female b) What would you predict as a wage for a single female with 12 years of ed c) How would you interpret the coefficient of marfe. d) On the basis of this output would you say that there was evidence of discrimination against single men relative to married e) On the basis of this output would you say that there was evidence of discrimination against single men relative to married women. f) On the basis of this output would you say that there was evidence of discrimination single women relative to married men. g) On the basis of this output would you say that there was evidence of discrimination single women relative to married women. h) On the basis of this output would you say that discrimination against single persons is worse for women than for men.
g exp2 = exp^
. reg lnwage ed exp exp
lnwage | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] ---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------- ed | .0897588 .0083203 10.788 0.000 .0734139. exp | .0349377 .0056491 6.185 0.000 .0238403. exp2 | -.0005362 .0001245 -4.307 0.000 -.0007808 -. _cons | .5202983 .1236135 4.209 0.000 .2774659.
Sketch the relationship between lnwage and experience