Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

A-Class-Divided.pdf, Lecture notes of Ethics

Jane Elliott, a third-grade teacher in a small, Iowa town, told her students that melanin was what determined intelligence. She went.

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

palumi
palumi 🇺🇸

4.2

(14)

245 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Bates 1
Mia Bates
Robin Littell
GSW 105
October 25 2016
“A Class Divided” Reflection
During the Sixties, Martin Luther King Jr., an incredibly necessary and influential Civil
Rights activist, was shot and killed, and the reaction of one teacher was unlike any other. She
took an experimental approach many would deem unethical. Jane Elliott, a third-grade teacher in
a small, Iowa town, told her students that melanin was what determined intelligence. She went
on to tell them that blue-eyed people are better in virtually every way than people with brown
eyes. This information affected everything that happened in class that Friday. Students weren’t
supposed to play with children of the other eye color at recess; the brown eyed weren’t even
allowed to use the play structure at all. Having blue eyes came with perks (five additional
minutes on the playground) and having brown eyes had extra drawbacks (having to use paper
cups instead of the water fountain). Some children were encouraged and praised while others
were publicly criticized the the teacher they all trusted and looked up to. Although the exercise
was and still is so controversial, the issues raised and impact on the participants is absolutely
imperative in beginning to understand discrimination.
When discussing the activity Jane Elliott first tried with her third grade students, many
people respond negatively, proposing that the experiment was unethical and unfair to the
children. In actual scientific experiments, ethics are always a concern. One point is that before
the exercise began, a student asked why Martin Luther King Jr. was killed. Elliott asked if the
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download A-Class-Divided.pdf and more Lecture notes Ethics in PDF only on Docsity!

Mia Bates Robin Littell GSW 105 October 25 2016 “A Class Divided” Reflection During the Sixties, Martin Luther King Jr., an incredibly necessary and influential Civil Rights activist, was shot and killed, and the reaction of one teacher was unlike any other. She took an experimental approach many would deem unethical. Jane Elliott, a third-grade teacher in a small, Iowa town, told her students that melanin was what determined intelligence. She went on to tell them that blue-eyed people are better in virtually every way than people with brown eyes. This information affected everything that happened in class that Friday. Students weren’t supposed to play with children of the other eye color at recess; the brown eyed weren’t even allowed to use the play structure at all. Having blue eyes came with perks (five additional minutes on the playground) and having brown eyes had extra drawbacks (having to use paper cups instead of the water fountain). Some children were encouraged and praised while others were publicly criticized the the teacher they all trusted and looked up to. Although the exercise was and still is so controversial, the issues raised and impact on the participants is absolutely imperative in beginning to understand discrimination. When discussing the activity Jane Elliott first tried with her third grade students, many people respond negatively, proposing that the experiment was unethical and unfair to the children. In actual scientific experiments, ethics are always a concern. One point is that before the exercise began, a student asked why Martin Luther King Jr. was killed. Elliott asked if the

students wanted to know what his experience as a person of color was like, she wanted her all white students to get a glimpse at what discrimination could feel like, and all the students agreed. Another approach necessary when determining whether an experiment is ethical or not, the pros and cons are weighed. How important are the results and how much harm would it do? When asking participants after the fact and much later on, everyone involved declares how wildly important the exercise was and they’re all so appreciative of it. The learning experience and perspective shift that came from the exercise is more important than the discomfort the children experienced for only a day, especially when people of color and other minorities experience that discrimination and more acts of oppression on a daily basis spanning their whole life without any say at all. Something I found interesting and honestly refreshing was how vocal the children were against the injustice. When the exercise was performed with adults, the supposed inferior group was quiet; rarely did someone speak up or step out of line, and if or when someone did, the rest of the members of that group remained submissive. The young students were much more naive and hadn’t yet learned why people remain silent (safety in numbers, fear of consequences) so they complained and pointed out what was wrong and why in such innocent and straightforward ways. If something felt unfair, they expressed that. However many of the children took the provided superiority to such a dramatic degree, overcome by the new sense of power and confidence. Later, when reflecting on the experience, one of the former students said that all of the built up anger towards whatever person had become justified; this new title became an outlet for expressing any negative feelings that had developed for any other individual. During school that day, if a brown eyed student made a

much less judgemental, understanding the injustice that comes with viewing things only in line with an image or specific idea, more empathetic to people facing different circumstances.