Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Angular Momentum and Parity: A Quantum Primer, Lecture notes of Quantum Mechanics

An introduction to the concepts of angular momentum and parity in quantum mechanics. It discusses orbital angular momentum as a conserved quantity in central field problems, the relationship between quantum numbers ℓ and mℓ, and the concept of spin angular momentum. The document also covers the addition of orbital and intrinsic angular momenta to form total angular momentum and the determination of parity through spherical harmonics.

What you will learn

  • What is orbital angular momentum in quantum mechanics?
  • How are the quantum numbers ℓ and mℓ related?
  • What is spin angular momentum and how is it different from orbital angular momentum?

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

alley
alley 🇺🇸

4.2

(5)

256 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
A PRIMER ON THE ANGULAR MOMENTUM AND PARITY
QUANTUM NUMBERS
Orbital Angular Momentum
Central field problems are common in physics and are based on a potential
than only depends on the distance from a fixed origin, usually the centre of mass
of the system. The associated force is directed towards the same point. An
important example of a classical central field problem is gravitational planetary
motion. The force on an orbiting planet is the gravitational attraction to the
centre of mass of the system i.e. along the radius vector r. Therefore the torque
on the object N=r×Fhas to be zero and so the orbital angular momentum
cannot change, unless there is some influence from something external to the
system.
The same is true in quantum mechanics; for a central field problem, orbital
angular momentum is a conserved quantity and therefore has a good quantum
number `. [In nuclei, a single nucleon is subjected to an approximately central
force, so orbital angular momentum is an approximately conserved quantity and
`is approximately a good quantum number]. Chapter 9 of A.C. Phillips’ book on
quantum mechanics runs through the quantum mechanical problem of a generic
central field. It is simplest to use spherical polar coordinates, and because the
potential only depends on r, the three-dimensional Schr¨
dinger equation separates
into a radial equation that is peculiar to the potential (i.e. whether it is Coulomb
as in the atom, or the square-ish well potential for a nucleon in the nucleus).
The angular equation is always the same for a central field problem:
ˆ
L2Y`,m`=`(`+ 1)¯h2Y`,m`
where ˆ
Lis the operator for orbital angular momentum and Y`,m`are a set of
standard functions called spherical harmonics.
The quantum number `specifies the length of the orbital angular momentum
vector, which is equal to ¯hq`(`+ 1). It can only take values that are positive
integers. It is usually denoted by a letter according to a series s, p, d, f, g, h,
i, j, k ..., for `= 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ,6 7, 8... respectively, that has its roots in old
optical spectroscopic notation.
The quantum number m`again can only be integer and runs from `to +`.
It is related to the zcomponent of the orbital angular momentum vector, which
is equal to m`¯h. Remember from elementary quantum mechanics, the knowledge
of the length and one component of an angular momentum vector is all you can
have.
1
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Angular Momentum and Parity: A Quantum Primer and more Lecture notes Quantum Mechanics in PDF only on Docsity!

A PRIMER ON THE ANGULAR MOMENTUM AND PARITY

QUANTUM NUMBERS

Orbital Angular Momentum Central field problems are common in physics and are based on a potential than only depends on the distance from a fixed origin, usually the centre of mass of the system. The associated force is directed towards the same point. An important example of a classical central field problem is gravitational planetary motion. The force on an orbiting planet is the gravitational attraction to the centre of mass of the system i.e. along the radius vector r. Therefore the torque on the object N = r × F has to be zero and so the orbital angular momentum cannot change, unless there is some influence from something external to the system.

The same is true in quantum mechanics; for a central field problem, orbital angular momentum is a conserved quantity and therefore has a good quantum number . [In nuclei, a single nucleon is subjected to an approximately central force, so orbital angular momentum is an approximately conserved quantity and is approximately a good quantum number]. Chapter 9 of A.C. Phillips’ book on quantum mechanics runs through the quantum mechanical problem of a generic central field. It is simplest to use spherical polar coordinates, and because the potential only depends on r, the three-dimensional Schrdinger equation separates¨ into a radial equation that is peculiar to the potential (i.e. whether it is Coulomb as in the atom, or the square-ish well potential for a nucleon in the nucleus). The angular equation is always the same for a central field problem:

L^ ˆ^2 Y,m = ( + 1)¯h^2 Y,m

where Lˆ is the operator for orbital angular momentum and Y,m are a set of standard functions called spherical harmonics.

The quantum number ` specifies the length of the orbital angular momentum

vector, which is equal to ¯h

( + 1). It can only take values that are positive integers. It is usually denoted by a letter according to a series s, p, d, f, g, h, i, j, k ..., for ` = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ,6 7, 8... respectively, that has its roots in old optical spectroscopic notation.

The quantum number magain can only be integer and runs from − to +. It is related to the z component of the orbital angular momentum vector, which is equal to m¯h. Remember from elementary quantum mechanics, the knowledge of the length and one component of an angular momentum vector is all you can have.

The radial equation from the separation ends up containing , so the energies of levels depends on the length of the orbital angular momentum vector. However, unless there is some special circumstance normally involving external magnetic fields, the level energy does not depend on m. So a level with a particular is usually composed of 2 + 1 degenerate m` substrates.

Spin Angular Momentum Electrons, protons and neutrons all have an intrinsic angular momentum asso- ciated with them that is similar to the classical concept of spin. By analogy with orbital angular momentum, one can define a set of spin operators for the length and the z component of spin, Sˆ^2 and Sˆz respectively. These are associated with a set of spin eigenvectors χs,ms , where s and ms are the quantum numbers.

Intrinsic spin is not as easy to describe as orbital angular momentum and requires different handling. This results in the s quantum number being able to take both positive half integer and positive integer values corresponding to fermion and boson particles. The quantum number ms runs from −s to+s.

Total Angular Momentum For particles with both orbital and intrinsic spin, the two angular momenta can be added vectorially to produce a total angular momentum vector. Again this has quantum numbers j and mj to describe the length of the total angular

momentum ¯h

√ j(j + 1) and its z component ¯hmj. If a particle has quantum numbers and s, the total angular momentum quantum number can be from | − s| to + s in integer steps. For example, if = 2 and s = 1/ 2 then j = 3/ 2 or 5 / 2.

Spectroscopic notation can be used to describe a spin-1/2 fermion in a level with particular j and values; nj is used. n is the quantum number arising from the radial equation and usually determines the energy of the level, along with . In the previous example, the two levels arising form the coupling of = 2 and s = 1/ 2 would be labelled by d 3 / 2 and d 5 / 2 , prefaced by the appropriate n value.

Parity Parity is a quantum number that tells you about how the wave function behaves if you invert the coordinate system, i.e. for Cartesian coordinates x → −x, y → −y and z → −z; for spherical polars you just need θ → −θ and φ → φ + π. If Pˆ is an operator that does this, and you applied the operator twice, you should end up with the same thing. Trying that:

P ψ^ ˆ = pψ

where p is the ”quantum number” for parity. And again:

P^ ˆ P ψˆ = P pψˆ = p^2 ψ.