











Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
This research paper examines the impact of climate change and technological factors on rice productivity in india. It analyzes the long-term and short-term effects of climate variables such as temperature, rainfall, and co2 emissions on rice yield. The study also investigates the role of technological factors like fertilizer consumption, irrigation, and area under cultivation in influencing rice productivity. The paper concludes that while climate change poses significant challenges to rice production, technological advancements and policy interventions can mitigate these challenges and enhance rice productivity in india.
Typology: Slides
1 / 19
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Assessing the Impact of Climate and Technological Factors on Rice Productivity in India
INTRODUCTION
Abbas (2020) Exploring robust short run and long run relationship between cultivated area, temperature change, fertilizer input and production of cotton Auto regressive distributive lag model (ARDL)
Bharadwaj et al. (2022) To examine the climatic change and its impact on the productivity of highly demanding agricultural crops. Fully modified ordinary least square and Dynamic ordinary least square, pooled mean group
OBJECTIVE
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 0
1
2
3
**Temperature variability 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
7
Rainfall variability 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025**
**Average temperature 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
7
avegare rainfall Fig. 1: Climate trend**
Where; (^) represents the coefficients of short run dynamics (^) stands for the coefficients of long-run in the same model. (^) is lag operator of first difference and is the error term in the model. The null & the alternative hypothesis are formulated in the following:
Descriptive Statistics Rice Yield Fertilizers Irrigation Rainfall Temperature Mean 2113 200.97 55.2568 1139.999 25. Median 2079 183.98 55.23 1120.200 25. Maximum 2705 293.69 63.1684 1327 26. Minimum 1740 115.68 45.55 972.80 25. Std. Dev 291.54 58.7519 4.99 95.09 0. Skewness 0.4143 0.0546 -0.3745 0.271 0. Kurtosis 2.0171 1.4911 2.1333 2.28 2. Jarque-Bera 2.1347 2.9561 1.6948 1.0577 0. Probability 0.34 0.22 0.4285 0.5892 0. Sum 65503 6230.180 1712.963 35339.96 795. Sum Sq. Dev. 2550020 103553.9 749.119 271268.8 1. Observations 31 31 31 31 31 Table 1: Details of the Summary of Descriptive Statistics Source: Authors’ calculation from the compiled data set.
Function F-statistic 12.417* Critical value bounds Lower Bound Upper Bound Significance I(0) I(1) 5 per cent 2.86 4. 1 per cent 2.45 3. Table 3. ARDL Co-integration results for yield of rice Source: Authors’ calculation from the compiled data set. Note: ‘’, ‘’ and ‘**’ are significant at 1%, 5% and 10% level
Estimates & Adjustment Variables Dependent Variable:^ Coefficient^ Std. Error^ t-statistic^ Probability LNRY ADJ LNRY(-1) -0.6738* 0.1447 -4.66 0. Long run dynamics LNFERC 0.3179* 0.0927 3.43 0. LNIRRI 0.7250** 0.3118 2.32 0. LNRAIN 16.6155** 6.5218 2.55 0. LNTEMP -16.1084** 6.4715 -2.49 0. Short run dynamics D(LNFERC) -0.1200 0.1063 -1.13 0. D(LNFERC(-1)) -0.6826* 0.1124 -6.07 0. D(LNIRRI) -0.1443 0.2805 -0.51 0. D(LNRAIN) -4.4354*** 2.1511 -2.06 0. D(LNTEMP) 4.1658*** 2.1609 1.93 0. D((LNTEMP(-1)) -0.1769* 0.0427 -4.14 0. D(LNTEMP(-2)) -0.0566*** 0.0318 -1.78 0. Constant 49.8919 16.8265 2.97 0. Goodness of Fit R-squared = 0.9881, Adjusted R-squared = 0.9719, F-statistics = 60.90 and Probability (F-statistics) = 0. Source: Authors’ calculation from the compiled data set. Note: ‘’, ‘’ and ‘**’ are significant at 1%, 5% and 10% level. Table 4. Long Run and short-run results based on the ARDL model on rice production
00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 CUSUM of Square s 5 % Significance Fig.2: Stability of the ARDL model
Conclusion & Policy Suggestion