Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Along-Wind Dynamic Response - Wind Engineering - Lecture Slides, Slides of Environmental Law and Policy

Some concept of Wind Engineering are Aeroelastic Effects, Along-Wind Dynamic Response, Antennas and Open-Frame Structures, Atmospheric Boundary Layers and Turbulence, Atmospheric Boundary, Basic Bluff-Body Aerodynamics. Main points of this lecture are: Along-Wind Dynamic Response, Dynamic Re, Experience Fluctuating, High Aerodynamic, Transmission Lines, Dynamic Response, History of Fluctuating, History of Response, Natural Frequency, Damping Forces

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 04/25/2013

gurudev
gurudev 🇮🇳

4.6

(10)

102 documents

1 / 24

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Along-wind dynamic response
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18

Partial preview of the text

Download Along-Wind Dynamic Response - Wind Engineering - Lecture Slides and more Slides Environmental Law and Policy in PDF only on Docsity!

Along-wind dynamic response

  • Significant resonant dynamic response can occur under wind actions

for structures with n 1 < 1 Hertz (approximate)

  • All structures will experience fluctuating loads below resonant

frequencies (background response)

  • Significant resonant response may not occur if damping is high enough
    • e.g. electrical transmission lines - ‘pendulum’ modes - high aerodynamic

damping

  • Time history of fluctuating wind force

D(t)

time

  • Time history of fluctuating wind force

D(t)

time

time

x(t)

High

n 1

  • Time history of response :
    • Structure with high natural frequency
  • Features of resonant dynamic response :
  • Time-history effect : when vibrations build up structure response at

any given time depends on history of loading

  • Stable vibration amplitudes : damping forces = applied loads

inertial forces (mass  acceleration) balance elastic forces in structure

effective static loads : ( 1 times) inertial forces

  • Additional forces resist loading : inertial forces, damping forces
  • Comparison with dynamic response to earthquakes :
  • Earthquakes are shorter duration than most wind storms
  • Earthquake forces appear as fully-correlated equivalent lateral forces

wind forces (along-wind and cross wind) are partially -correlated fluctuating

forces

  • Dominant frequencies of excitation in earthquakes are 10-50 times higher

than wind loading

  • Random vibration approach :
    • Uses spectral densities (frequency domain) for calculation :
  • Along-wind response of single-degree-of freedom structure :
    • mass-spring-damper

system, mass small w.r.t.

length scale of turbulence

D(t)

k

c

m

2 mk

c η  m

k

2 π

n 1 

representative of large mass

supported by a low-mass column

mx  cxkxD(t)

  • equation of motion :
  • Along-wind response of single-degree-of freedom structure :
    • deflection : X(t) = X + x '( t )

spectral density :

mean deflection :

where the mechanical admittance is given by :

this is relation between spectral density

of deflection and approach velocity

k

D

X ^ k = spring stiffness

H(n) S (n) k

S (n) D

2 x (^2)

2

1

2

2 2

1

2

n

n 4 η n

n 1

H(n)

S (n)

U

4 D

H(n)

k

S (n) u

2

2 2 x (^2)

  • Aerodynamic admittance:
    • Larger structures - velocity fluctuations approaching

windward face cannot be assumed to be uniform

where  2

(n) is the ‘aerodynamic admittance’

then :

S (n)

U

4 D

S (n) (n). u

2

2 2

D  Χ

  • Aerodynamic admittance:

hence :

substituting D = kX :

. (n).S (n)

U

4 D

H(n)

k

S (n) u

2 2

2 2 x (^2)

H(n). (n).S (n)

U

4 X

S (n) u

(^22) 2

2

x  Χ

  • Mean square deflection :

where :

 

 

 

0

u

(^22) 2

2

0

x

2 x H(n). (n).S (n).dn U

4 X

σ S (n).dn Χ

B R

U

4 X σ

.dn

S (n)

H(n). (n).

U

4 X σ

2

2 u

2

0

2 u

(^22) u 2

2 u

2 2 x ^   

0

2 u

(^2) u .dn σ

S (n) B Χ (n). 

0

2 2 u

u 1 1

2 H(n) .dn σ

S (n ) R Χ (n ).

assumes X^2 (n) and Su(n) are constant at X^2 (n 1 ) and

Su(n 1 ), near the resonant peak

independent of

frequency

  • Gust response factor (G) :

Expected maximum response in defined time period /

mean response in same time period

g = peak factor

X X gσx

B R

U

1 2g

X

1 g

X

X

G

x u

2 log (υT)

g 2 log (υT)

e

e

 = ‘cycling’ rate (average frequency)

  • Dynamic response factor (C dyn ):

Maximum response including correlation and resonant effects /

maximum response excluding correlation and resonant effects

This is a factor defined as follows :

U

1 2g

B R

U

1 2g

C

u

u

dyn

B = 1 (reduction due to correlation ignored)

R = 0 (resonant effects ignored)

Used in codes and standards based on peak gust (e.g. ASCE-7)