


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Thus, a rapid, simple field diagnostic test that could be used to pre-screen samples intended for. PCR analysis would be beneficial. Anatomical studies ...
Typology: Slides
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
HS
The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other UF/IFAS Extension publications, contact your county’s UF/IFAS Extension office. U.S. Department of Agriculture, UF/IFAS Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A & M University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, dean for UF/IFAS Extension.
Diagnosing huanglongbing (HLB or citrus greening disease) can be difficult under field conditions when relying solely on visual symptoms. The best diagnostic symptom of HLB is the blotchy mottle pattern on leaves (Figure 1A). However, it can be difficult to distinguish blotchy mottle caused by HLB infection from similar symptoms caused by girdling of the branches and other physiological disorders or diseases. For example, deficiencies of micronutrients such as zinc, manganese and iron (Figure 1B-D) can be mistaken for HLB. Currently, the only definitive test for HLB is polymerase chain reaction analysis, or PCR, analysis, a DNA-based test. PCR analysis, however, is time consuming and expensive, and is not suitable for large numbers of samples. Thus, a rapid, simple field diagnostic test that could be used to pre-screen samples intended for PCR analysis would be beneficial.
Anatomical studies conducted in the 1960s, found “massive accumulation” of starch in leaf samples collected from HLB-infected sweet orange trees. More recent studies have quantified starch accumulation in HLB-infected leaves at six times more than healthy leaves. Starch readily reacts with iodine, resulting in a very dark grey to black stain. Recently, a number of researchers from Vietnam and Japan have been working to adapt this starch/iodine reaction into a diagnostic tool for HLB, and they report up to 90%
agreement between PCR analysis and starch tests with io- dine. IFAS has not performed a similar correlation analysis, although studies are ongoing. An IFAS-developed version of this test, how to perform it, the required materials, its potential benefits, its limitations, and how to interpret the results is presented here.
Figure 1. Citrus leaves showing HLB symptoms (A), manganese (B), zinc (C) and iron (D) deficiency symptoms. Credits: Tim Spann (A) and Tom Obreza (B, C, and D), University of Florida.
Selecting Leaves for Testing
Choosing leaves to test is a crucial step in the diagnostic or confirmation process. Just as submitting hundreds of leaves for PCR testing would not be efficient, it is not efficient to use this test on leaves whose symptoms can easily be determined to be caused by something other than HLB. We recommend the following criteria be used in selecting leaves:
Iodine Solution
There are a number of iodine solutions available at drugstores and pharmacies (Table 1). For this test, purchase products labeled as either “tincture of iodine” or “iodine tincture.” These products contain iodine and sodium iodide dissolved in alcohol and water. Other iodine products that are labeled “iodine solution” such as Betadine® (povidone- iodine) contain surfactants and other chemicals that prevent them from reacting with starch.
For use in this test, the purchased tincture of iodine should be diluted 1 to 10 with water (i.e. 1 part iodine mixed with 9 parts water). Do not use the iodine tincture straight; the undiluted tincture will react very strongly with even small quantities of starch, potentially leading to false positives. The diluted iodine solution should be stored in a dark tinted (e.g. brown glass) or opaque container. Clear con- tainers can be covered with aluminum foil. The prepared solution will last for a few days when properly stored.
Performing the Test The steps to follow to perform the iodine test are outlined below. As with leaf selection, the portion of the leaf tested is important. In cases where the entire leaf is not symp- tomatic, the symptomatic section is preferred for testing. This test is intended to be used in the field; however, if it is impractical to test leaves in the field, they may be sealed in a zip-top bag and stored in a cooler with ice until the test can be performed. Leaves should not be stored for more than 24 hours, and then only under refrigerated conditions.
Table 1. Iodine solutions commercially available at most pharmacies and drugstores
Name Active ingredient(s) Starch reactive Betadine, Xenodine or generic equivalent
Povidone-Iodine 10% (PVP) No
Iodine tincture USP Iodine 2% (may or may not also include sodium iodide 2.4%)
Yes
Lugol’s iodine* Iodine 2%, potassium iodide 4%
Untested, but should react *This is a dietary supplement sold to alleviate iodine deficiency in humans, and thus is expensive and impractical to use for this test.
Figure 2. A citrus leaf with the vein corking symptom of HLB properly sectioned for the iodine test. The arrow indicates the symptomatic section to be used for testing. Credits: Pedro Gonzalez
test can be a useful tool to help you select the best samples for PCR analysis, thus helping to reduce the number of negative samples submitted. IFAS does not recommend that the results of this test be used in making decisions about the HLB status of a tree or whether to remove a tree. PCR testing remains the current, definitive test for HLB and it should be relied upon for making management decisions.
Additional Information
Hong, L.T.T. and N.T.N. Truc. 2003. Iodine reaction quick detection of huanglongbing disease. Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Workshop of JIRCAS Mekong Delta Project: 1-11. http://www.ctu.edu.vn/institutes/mdi/jircas/JIRCAS/ research/workshop/pro03/B3-Fruit%203%20(Hong).pdf