History Notes- Module 1
1. Definitions of History
R.G Collingwood’s Definition of History:
Collingwood’s The Idea of History was incomplete at the time of his death in 1943. The book,
published posthumously in 1946, was compiled and edited from his unfinished manuscripts. Despite
its incomplete nature, the work remains highly influential, particularly for its philosophical insights
into the nature of historical inquiry. He emphasizes the intellectual engagement of the historian,
defining history not as a recounting of events but as a reenactment of past thoughts. His approach
challenges traditional historical methods, advocating for a more philosophical and interpretive view.
-History as Reenactment of Thought: Collingwood’s famous definition—“history is nothing but
the reenactment of past thought in the historian's mind”—positions history as an intellectual
process. The historian's task is to mentally reconstruct the thoughts and motivations of historical
figures, moving beyond mere fact collection.
He insists that history should focus on understanding the reasoning behind actions, framing it as
a study of human intentions. This emphasis on thought over action forms the core of his
philosophical perspective on history.
-His Critique of Early Historians: In The Idea of History, Collingwood critiques early historians,
particularly Greek writers like Aristotle, for reducing history to a causal account of events. He
opposes this view, arguing that history is not the study of what caused events, but rather the
intellectual processes behind those events.
His critique is significant because it refocuses history on understanding the thoughts driving
human actions, rather than providing a simple cause-and-effect explanation of events.
-The Subjective Role of the Historian: Collingwood stresses that historians are not neutral
observers. He famously writes, “the historian is not God, looking at the world from above and
outside.” Historians are bound by their own cultural and temporal contexts, and they interpret the
past through the lens of their present. This acknowledgment of subjectivity does not invalidate
historical inquiry. Instead, Collingwood argues that it is the historian’s only possible standpoint,
allowing them to engage with the past meaningfully. He believes historians must embrace their
perspectives to understand the thoughts and intentions of historical figures.
-Collingwood's redefinition of history as a philosophical and intellectual exercise shifts the focus
from mere facts to the understanding of human thought. Through his work, he challenges
traditional objective approaches to history, emphasizing the historian's interpretative role. His
view—that history is the study of past thought reenacted in the historian’s mind—remains
influential in the field of historical philosophy.
1
