Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Badura’s Social Learning Theory, Slides of Social Theory

Bandura experienced with Bobo doll in 1961 and presented social learning theory

Typology: Slides

2021/2022

Uploaded on 03/31/2022

unknown user
unknown user 🇺🇸

1 / 9

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Children observe the people around them behaving
in various ways. This is illustrated during the
famous Bobo doll experiment (Bandura, 1961).
Individuals that are observed are called models.
In society, children are surrounded by many
influential models, such as parents within the
family, characters on children’s TV, friends within
their peer group and teachers at school. These
models provide examples of behavior to observe
and imitate, e.g., masculine and feminine, pro and
anti-social, etc.
Badura’s Social Learning Theory
Children watched a video
of men and women being
aggressive to a blow up
doll (bobo doll).
The children were
allowed to play with the
bobo doll.
All the children showed
aggressive behaviour
towards the bobo doll.
Children pay attention to some of these people (models)
and encode their behavior. At a later time they may
imitate (i.e., copy) the behavior they have observed.
Reinforcement can be external or internal and can be
positive or negative. If a child wants approval from
parents or peers, this approval is an external
reinforcement, but feeling happy about being approved
of is an internal reinforcement.
Girls who viewed male
models were more
aggressive compared to girl
who watched female models
were more verbally
aggressive.
Therefore Bandura
believed that if a child
observed aggressive
behaviour such as domestic
abuse they were more
liklely to engage in the
behaviour.
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9

Partial preview of the text

Download Badura’s Social Learning Theory and more Slides Social Theory in PDF only on Docsity!

Children observe the people around them behaving in various ways. This is illustrated during the famous Bobo doll experiment (Bandura, 1961). Individuals that are observed are called models. In society, children are surrounded by many influential models, such as parents within the family, characters on children’s TV, friends within their peer group and teachers at school. These models provide examples of behavior to observe and imitate, e.g., masculine and feminine, pro and anti-social, etc.

Badura’s Social Learning Theory

Children watched a video

of men and women being

aggressive to a blow up

doll (bobo doll).

The children were

allowed to play with the

bobo doll.

All the children showed

aggressive behaviour

towards the bobo doll.

Children pay attention to some of these people (models)

and encode their behavior. At a later time they may

imitate (i.e., copy) the behavior they have observed.

Reinforcement can be external or internal and can be

positive or negative. If a child wants approval from

parents or peers, this approval is an external

reinforcement, but feeling happy about being approved

of is an internal reinforcement.

Girls who viewed male models were more aggressive compared to girl who watched female models were more verbally aggressive. Therefore Bandura believed that if a child observed aggressive behaviour such as domestic abuse they were more liklely to engage in the behaviour.

Badura’s Social Learning Theory

Bowlby argued that infants have an inbuilt need to form an attachment with a carer. The quality of this attachment may affect emotional development for the rest of the child’s life.

According to Piaget, a schema is a category of knowledge as well as the process of acquiring knowledge. A child develops concepts about the world around them (a state of equilibrium). As they experience situations where new information is presented, their schemas are upset and they reach a state of disequilibrium. As the new information is accommodated, the original schemas are modified or changed so they again reach a stage of equilibrium.

Piaget’’s Theory of Cognitive Development

Sensorimotor: (Birth–2 years) Infants think by interacting with the world using their eyes, ears, hands and mouth. Preoperational: (2–7 years) Children use symbols to represent their earlier sensorimotor discoveries. Development of language and make-believe play takes place. Concrete operational: (7–11 years) Children’s reasoning becomes logical providing the issues are concrete. Formal operational: (11–18 years) This is when the capacity for abstract thinking allows adolescents to reason through symbols that do not refer to objects in the real world, as is required in advanced mathematics. In the operational stage children understand the theory of conservation – that something’s appearance may change but that its quantity will stay the same. Egocentrism is best described as a young child’s inability to see a situation from another person’s point of view. They assume that other adults and children see, feel, and hear exactly the same as they do. Object permanence is a child’s understanding that objects continue to exist even though they cannot be seen or heard.

According to this theory, some individuals are born with certain biological or genetic

predispositions to a mental illness, referred to as diathesis.

A person who has a genetic predisposition to a psychological disorder might never develop the

disorder if they do not experience stress in their life.

High levels of stress, such as family conflict, abuse, trauma or problems at school, could trigger

the onset for those with a predisposition.

Stress diathesis model

While these theories are useful guidance they do not provide the answers as to whether

development throughout the lifespan is down to nature or nurture. It is probably more useful to

assume that hereditary and environmental factors (nature and nurture) interact to influence

the type of person an individual becomes and the type of behaviour they display.

The stress-diathesis psychological model helps to explain how stress caused by life events

(nurture) can interact with an individual’s genetic vulnerability (nature) to impact on their

mental wellbeing.

Gesell noted that each child moved through the sequence at their own pace. He came to the

conclusion that development was predetermined and that the environment had little influence.

If a child experiences delayed development, then the problem is heredity rather than the result

of the child’s environment and circumstances.

Gessel’s Maturation Theory

Critics of Gesell suggest that maturation theory is not helpful in explaining individual or cultural

differences or for children with learning difficulties.

Gesell was interested in children’s biological maturation (that part of their growth determined

by genetically determined physiological processes).

His findings were used to establish ‘norms’ or milestones for each developmental aspect.

It recognised that this may involve adjusting to changes in health and/or mobility but theorised that

older people’s needs can be satisfied by taking on new roles following retirement such as charity work,

joining social groups or learning a new skill.

Activity Theory

Research supports his theory. Many older people look forward to retirement, viewing this part of their

lifespan as an opportunity to pursue new hobbies and interests and to meet new friends. When people

remain physically and socially active, their overall satisfaction and wellbeing is increased. This is

important for reducing the risk of illness and increasing longevity.

Activity theory was proposed as an explanation to ageing in the 1960s. The ten year study of older

people showed that, rather than an inevitable decline in interest in life and isolation, older people tend

to adjust to the ageing process.