
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
one of convention for environmental issues
Typology: Summaries
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
One of the problems about the Basel Convention is that it contains significant definitional loopholes regarding the distinction between waste and non-waste, as well as the distinction between hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste. These definitional loopholes are abused by developed countries like Canada, USA, and South Korea. These countries are exploiting the good name of recycling and use it to justify that all exports are just moving in countries where the wastes would be recycled. No wonder some least developed countries and environmental organizations argued that the Basel Convention did not go far enough. Within the given problem, there should be a total ban on shipment of all hazardous waste. Fortunately, an amendment to the convention was made in 1995 termed as Basel Ban Amendment. The Basel Ban Amendment bans all shipments of hazardous waste from developed to developing countries, even for recycling purposes. It also Promote clean production, stop toxic technologies and prevent governments and companies from circumventing the recycling loophole in the Basel Convention. The amendment seems to be good, right? But wait, even though there’s an amendment made, the problem about waste shipments still exist. The nations signed to the Basel Convention are not mandated or required to ratify the said amendment, meaning, they could still shipped recycling- registered-wastes to least developed countries. The Basel convention should require all its signatories to also adopt the ban amendment, for it will protect the developing countries and penalized the violators. As we all know, the Philippines always received hazardous waste from different countries like Canada and South Korea. The Philippines, Canada, South Korea, and other countries were signed to the convention but not yet ratify the ban amendment, because of this; those irresponsible developed countries were not held accountable of their waste shipments, while the developing countries were not protected. This large scale of bullying should be stopped. Converting other nations to be your dumping ground was just so disrespectful and insulting. Those industrialized countries should be more responsible about their own wastes.