



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
In this book review, Giuseppe Polise explores Omise’eke Natasha Tinsley’s study on Beyoncé as a black feminst. Tinsley's definition of black feminity and her exploration of Beyoncé's relationship to it challenges white heteropatriarchal constructions of black women's race, gender, and sexuality. The book also discusses the importance of recognizing desire as a means of challenging critical regimes and the significance of Beyoncé's music in relation to black feminist models of motherhood and pleasure politics.
What you will learn
Typology: Study notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Omise’eke Natasha Tinsley (author) University of Texas Press, 2018, pp. 218, ISBN 1477317708 Reviewed by Giuseppe Polise n her innovative study, Omise’eke Natasha Tinsley writes about Beyoncé as a femme- inist. Describing herself, Tinsley offers a definition of the word: “for over twenty years I’ve lived my life as a lipsticked, high heeled, glittering black femme, a queer gender marked by a highly stylized and aestheticized femininity” (2018, 8). Drawing on Sydney Lewis’s attempt to define a black femme-inist criticism, Tinsley intends to explore the co-constitution of self-identified straight and queer femininities, showing that Beyoncé does not need to be labelled as “queer” to be profoundly related to the black femme experience. As a major contemporary black culture signifier, in fact, Beyoncé effectively opposes white heteropatriarchal constructions of black women’s race, gender and sexuality, and unapologetically affirms subjectivity. Before focusing on the main body of the work, the author engages the issue of femmephobia, too often internalized. In a society where the fear of women has slowly, but steadily turned into the fear of the feminine as synonym for weak, even homosocial contexts tend to replicate heteropatriachal structures of dominance and take eroticism, sensuality and “girliness” as matters of insufficient interest, and much less do they bother taking seriously those who do. Fiercely claiming her black femme-inist identity, Tinsley urges to collectively recognize desire as a means of challenging critical regimes that demand separation of body and mind for intellectual credibility. At this point, the reader is enabled to access “Beyoncé in Formation: Remixing Black Feminism” in its intricacy. As partly a memoir, the book follows the example of many post-Black Lives Matter publications that bear witness to the fragility and hardships faced by real black bodies on a daily basis, while nourishing pro-black sentiments. In this specific case, the book sidesteps linear narratives and brings forth personal anecdotes, thoughts on other singers, TV celebrities, and people that have a
| Book Review JAm It! No. 1 May 2019 | Nationalism: Hyper and Post 259 place in the life of the author as well as in her growth as a black scholar. All this is skilfully put in conversation with a well-developed cultural analysis of key songs from Beyoncé’s Lemonade album (2016). However, as deep and rich as the analysis may be, it is not envisioned as the primary goal of the book. “Beyoncé,” Tinsley maintains, “is not my target audience. [Rather, this is] a textual mixtape for all the women and femmes” (2018,
| Book Review JAm It! No. 1 May 2019 | Nationalism: Hyper and Post 261 appropriation of historical markers of black subjugation. To the scholar, those images particularly symbolize an attempt to envision black women who successfully raise their offspring despite the systematic withdrawal of all the basic principles of reproductive justice. As the author reports, “African American children spend more time in foster care, are less likely to go home to their parents, and wait longer for adoption” (115). In portraying all those women, many of whom are the mourning mothers of the Black Lives Matter Movement, the will to show how they can enjoy their time together with younger generations of black girls is fundamental. Through such an idealistic picture, Beyoncé embodies a call for comprehensive black justice, demanding not only individual reproductive health but also the health and security of the communities where black women choose to bear children. Tinsley’s vision for the book comes full circle at the end of Section Three, where she skilfully construes the “Formation” video as the clearest expression of black femme- inist pride of the entire project. To this end, the scholar inscribes the cameo of New Orleans queer queen of bounce Big Freedia in a broader message of female communion, while she also elaborates on the symbiotic relationship between cis-gender women and transgender women as enacted by the common signifier of the Southern hair store. A place where wigs, extensions and other styling products are bought, hair shops’ appearance in the visual represent a safe space for women of color to perform the cultural and conceptual labour of working through womanhood. Whether it is assigned at birth, reassigned, or just temporarily performed as in drag, femininity finds power and self- expression in such material spaces of Southern matrilineal tradition. In the author’s words, these are “touchstones for black Southern women, a place where trans-feminine and cis-feminine folk come together to create beauty,” where “cis- and trans women work together to coproduce womanhood” (133). In this sense, the aestheticized vision of black femininity that bell hooks has harshly labelled a “fashion plate fantasy” upon watching Lemonade, claims back its legitimacy through Tinsley’s work. This book ultimately suggests that black women’s cultivation of beauty on their own terms does not represent a liability and is indeed much more than frivolous adornment. It is an extension of the self of the black woman and, as such, should always be celebrated with pride.
Giuseppe Polise | 262 Giuseppe Polise holds a Master’s degree in Language and Comparative Literature from the University of Naples “L’Orientale” where he is currently a second year Ph.D. student in the Department of Literary, Linguistic and Comparative Studies. His scientific interests in the broad field of American Studies include Black Feminist Theory, the Studies of Performance applied to the representation of black diasporic cultural identity. As participant of the 2018 OASIS Summer School, he has published an article titled “Black Women Matter: The Black Lives Matter Movement, Black Female Singers, and Intersectional Feminism.” He took part in the September 2018 AISNA Graduate Conference with a paper on “The Choreography of Marching: From the 1960s Black Political Protest to Contemporary Popular Music” and to the University of Naples “L’Orientale” Graduate Conference where he presented the poster “My Gods Are Not Your Gods, or Are They? The Counter-Hegemonic Aesthetics of Beyoncé’s Live Performances.” His Ph.D. research aims at extending the critical interpretation of the conjure woman, a powerful archetype of folk tradition, and analyzes the presence of such figure found across the African Diaspora in traditional and contemporary forms of popular culture such as the novel and the visual album. In so doing, the project cross-pollinates Black Feminism and the Black Protest tradition in the visual/sonic representation of the cultural background that informs any reading of the conjure woman as a viable representative of black womanhood.