






Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The grand canonical ensemble is a generalization of the canonical ensemble where the restriction to a definite number of particles is removed. This is a ...
Typology: Study notes
1 / 12
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
The grand canonical ensemble is a generalization of the canonical ensemble where the restriction to a definite number of particles is removed. This is a realistic representation when then the total number of particles in a macroscopic system cannot be fixed.
Heat and particle reservoir. Consider a sys- tem A 1 in a heat and particle reservoir A 2. The two systems are in equilibrium with the thermal equilibrium.
Energy and particle conservation. We assume that the system A 2 is much larger than the system A 1 , i.e., that
E 2 � E 1 , N 2 � N 1 ,
with N 1 + N 2 = N = const. E 1 + E 2 = E = const.
where N and E are the particle number and the energy of the total system A = A 1 + A 2.
Hamilton function. The overall Hamilton function is defined as the sum of the Hamilton functions of A 1 and A 2 :
H(q, p) = H 1 (q(1), p(1), N 1 ) + H 2 (q(2), p(2), N 2 ).
For the above assumption to be valid, we neglect interactions among particles in A 1 and A 2 : H 12 = 0.
This is a valid assuming for most macroscopic systems.
Microcanonical ensemble. Since the total system A is isolated, its distribution function is given in the microcanonical ensemble as
ρ(q, p) =
δ(E − H 1 − H 2 ) ,
as in (9.1), with t
Ω(E, N ) =
d 3 N^ q d 3 N^ p δ(E − H 1 − H 2 )
being the density of states.
Sub-macroscopic particle exchange. The total entropy of the combined system is given by the microcanonical expression
S = k (^) B ln
, Γ 0 (N ) = h 3 N^ N 1 !N 2! , (10.1)
where Δ is the width of the energy shell. Compare (9.4) and Sect. 9.4.
The reason that Γ 0 (N ) ∼ N 1 !N 2! in (10.1), and not ∼ N !, stems from the assumption that there is no particles exchange on the macroscopic level. This is in line with the observation made in Sect. 9.6 that energy fluctuations, i.e. the exchange of energy between a system and the heat reservoir, scale like 1/
N relatively to the internal energy. We come back to this issue in Sect. 10.3.2.
Integrating out the reservoir. We are now interested in the system A 1. As we did for the canonical ensemble, we integrate the total probability density ρ(q, p) over the phase space of the reservoir A 2. We obtain
ρ 1 (q(1), p(1), N 1 ) ≡
dq(2) dp(2) ρ(q, p)
dq(2) dp(2) δ(E − H 1 − H 2 , N ) Ω(E, N )
≡
in analogy to (9.2).
Expanding in E 1 and N 1. With E 1 � E and N 1 � N , we can approximate the slowly varying logarithm of Ω 2 (E 2 , N 2 ) around E 2 = E and N 2 = N and thus obtain:
S 2 (E − E 1 , N − N 1 ) = k (^) B ln
N (^2)
N 2 = N
E (^2)
N 2 = N
In Sect. 5.4 we defined the grand canonical potential ∗^ as
Ω(T, V, μ) = F (T, V, N ) − μN , Ω = −P V ,
and showed with Eq. (5.21) that
U − μN =
∂β
βΩ
∂β
ln Z(T, V, μ) , (10.8)
where we have used in the last step the representation (10.7) of U − μN = ∂ ln Z/∂β.
Grand canonical potential. From (10.8) we may determine (up-to a constant) the grand canonical potential with
Ω(T, V, μ) = −k (^) B T ln Z(T, V, μ) , Z = e −βΩ^ (10.9)
as the logarithm of the grand canonical potential. Note the analog to the relation F = −k (^) B T ln Z (^) N valid within the canonical ensemble.
Calculating with the grand canonical ensemble. To summarize, in order to obtain the thermodynamic properties of our system in contact with a heat and particle reservoir, we do the following:
1 - calculate the grand canonical partition function:
N =
d 3 N^ q d 3 N^ p h 3 N^ N!
e −β(H−μN^ )^ ;
2 - calculate the grand canonical potential:
Ω = −k (^) B T ln Z = −P V, dΩ = −SdT − P dV − N dμ ;
3 - calculate the remaining thermodynamic properties through the equations:
V,μ
P = −
T,μ
∂μ
T,V
and the remaining thermodynamic potentials through Legendre transformations. ∗ (^) Don’t confuse the grand canonical potential Ω(T, V, μ) with the density of microstates Ω(E)!
By using the definition of the partition function in the canonical ensemble,
Z (^) N =
h 3 N^ N!
d 3 N^ q d 3 N^ p e −βH^ ,
we can rewrite the partition function in the grand canonical ensemble as
Z(T, V, μ) =
N =
e μN^ β^ Z (^) N (T ) =
N =
z N^ Z (^) N (T ) , (10.10)
where z = exp(μ/k (^) B T ) is denoted as the fugacity. Equation (10.10) shows that Z(T, μ) is the discrete Laplace transform of ZN (T ).
In the canonical ensemble the particle number N was fixed, whereas it is a variable in the in the grand canonical ensemble. We define with
w (^) N = e βμN^
Z(T, μ)
the probability that the system at temperature T and with chemical potential μ contains N particles. It is normalized:
�^ ∞
N =
w (^) n =
N =
e βμN^ Z (^) N (T ) Z(T, μ)
Average particle number. That mean particle number �N � is given by
N =
N w (^) N (T, V ) =
N =0 N z^
N =0 z^
which can be rewritten as
β
∂μ
ln Z(T, V, μ)
T,V
or, alternatively, as
�N � = z
∂z
ln Z(T, V, μ)
T,V
when making use of the definition of fugacity z.
Chemical potential. Conversely, the chemical potential for a given average particle number N = �N �, μ = μ(T, V, N ) ,
is obtained by by inverting (10.13).
In fact, this can be proven within the grand canonical ensemble in the same way as it was proven in Sect. 9.6 that the energy fluctuations in the canonical ensemble fulfill the thermal stability criterion
C (^) V = k (^) B β 2
Intensive variables. We start be defining the free energy per particle, a = F/N , as
a(T, v) ≡
v = V /N , (10.20)
where the v is the volume per particle (the specific volume).
Chemical potential. With (10.20) we find
μ =
= a + N
∂a ∂N
= a + N
∂a ∂(V /N )
−V /N 2
when using (5.12), namely that dF = −SdT − P dV + μdN. This relation yields
μ = a − v
∂a ∂v
∂μ ∂v
= −v
∂ 2 a ∂v 2
Note, that μ is intensive.
Pressure. For the pressure P , an intensive variable, we find likewise that
∂a ∂(V /N )
1 /N
which results in
∂a ∂v
∂v
∂ 2 a ∂v 2
∂μ ∂v
= v
∂v
where we have used in the last step the comparison with (10.21).
Particle fluctuations in intensive variables. Using intensive variables for (10.17),
β V
∂ 2 P (T, v) ∂μ 2
∂v
∂μ
∂v ∂μ
the last relation of (10.22) and (10.15), namely ∂P/∂μ = 1/v, we obtain
∂ 2 P (T, v) ∂μ 2
∂v
v
− 1 /v 2
v
∂v ∂P
−κ (^) T
, κ (^) T = −
v
∂v ∂P
Compressibility. Taking the results together we obtain
κ (^) T =
βv 2 V
= β
for the compressibility κT.
�N 2 � − �N � 2 vanishes in the thermodynamic limit relative to the number of particles N present in the system.
Response vs. fluctuations. The specific heat CV and the compressibility κT are mea- sure the response of the system to a change of variables.
ΔQ = C (^) V ΔT,
which is proportional to CV. Compare Sect. 3.2.
= κ (^) T ΔP,
which is proportional to κT.
It is not a coincidence, that both response functions, CV and κ (^) T , as given respectively by (10.19) and (10.24), are proportional to the fluctuations of the involved variables.
A system in which a certain variable A is not fluctuating (and hence fixed) cannot respond to perturbations trying to change A. The response always involves the fluctuation �� A − �A�
with (10.28) we find immediately the equation of state
V P = k (^) B T N
of the ideal gas
Entropy. Evaluating the entropy
V,μ
, Ω(T, V, μ) = −k (^) B T e μ/k^ B^ T^
λ (^3) T
λ (^) T = h √ 2 π m k (^) B T
we find
S = −
−μ k (^) B T 2
μ k (^) B T
which leads with (10.29), Ω = −k (^) B T N , to
S(T, V, μ) = kB N
μ k (^) B T
, N = e μ/k^ B^ T^
λ (^3) T
Sackur-Tetrode equation. Inverting N for μ/(k (^) B T ) we obtain for the entropy with
S = k (^) B N
ln
N λ (^3) T
the Sackur-Tetrode equation, which coincides with the both the microcanonical and the canonical expressions, (9.20) and (8.25). The three ensembles yield identical results in the thermodynamic limit.
Phase space integration Thermodynamic potential
Microcanonical Γ(E, V, N ) =
E<H<E+Δ
d 3 N^ q d 3 N^ p S(E, V, N ) = kB ln
h 3 N^ N!
ensemble
d 3 N^ q d 3 N^ p δ(E − H)
Canonical Z (^) N (T, V ) =
d 3 N^ q d 3 N^ p h 3 N^ N!
e −βH^ F (T, V, N ) = −k (^) B T ln Z (^) N (T, V ) ensemble =
h 3 N^ N!
0
dE Ω(E) e −βH^ Z (^) N = e −βF
Grand canonical Z(T, μ) =
N =0 e^
μN β (^) Z (^) N (T ) Ω(T, V, μ) = −k (^) B T ln Z(T, V, μ) ensemble Z = e −βΩ^ = e
P V kB T