



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An in-depth analysis of the importance of choosing the right solvent for chemical reactions. It discusses the concepts of specific and non-specific solvation, their effects on reaction stability, and the potential for solvents to interfere with the desired reaction. The document also covers salt formation and electron transfer reactions, highlighting the role of solvents in these processes.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
This work is produced by The Connexions Project and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License †
The choice of solvent is an important parameter for any chemical reaction. The following provides a guide to some of the consideration to be made in choosing a solvent to ensure the desired reaction occurs.
Solvation may be dened as the interaction between the solvent and the solute, however, two general classes of solvation have dierent consequences to the stability of either reagents or products in a chemical reaction, and hence the potential of a reaction to occur.
Figure 1: Examples of (a) specic and (b) non-specic solvation.
Table 1 shows the ability of three solvents to act with specic and non-specic solvation. The relative solvation ability of each solvent results in three dierent products from the dissolution of iron(III) chloride (FeCl 3 ).
∗Version 1.3: Jan 28, 2010 10:36 am US/Central †http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Solvation DMSO (Me 2 SO) Pyridine (C 5 H 5 N) Acetonitrile (MeCN) Specic Good Very good Poor Non-specic Good Poor Moderately good
Table 1: The ability for specic and non-specic solvation.
Dissolution of FeCl 3 in DMSO results in the dissociation of a chloride ligand, (1), due to both the specic solvation of the FeCl 2 + cation and the non-specic solvation of the Cl-^ anion. In fact, the good solvation properties of DMSO means that depending on the concentration (and temperature) a series of dissociations may occur, (2).
In contrast, if FeCl 3 is dissolved in pyridine (py) the neutral Lewis acid-base complex is formed, (3), because while pyridine is a very good at specic solvation (Table 1), it is poor at solvating the chloride anion.
In a similar manner, FeCl 3 (MeCN) 3 will be formed by the dissolution in acetonitrile, because although it is not good at specic solvation, it is not suciently good at non-specic solvation to stabilize the chloride anion. However, since the FeCl 4 -^ anion has a lower charge density that Cl-, it can be supported by the non-specic solvation of acetonitrile and thus a disproportionation reaction occurs, (4).
Rather than solvating a molecule or ion, the solvent can take an active and detrimental role in the synthesis of a desired compound.
2.1 Solvolysis
The archetypal solvolysis reaction is the reaction with water, i.e., hydrolysis, (5). However, solvolysis is a general reaction, involving bond breaking by the solvent. Thus, the reaction with ammonia is ammonolysis, (6), the reaction with acetic acid is acetolysis, (7), and the reaction with an alcohol is alcoholysis, (8) where Et = C 2 H 5. In each case the same general reaction takes place yielding the cation associated with the solvent.
In a similar manner, the weak basic character of water means the equilibrium reaction, (13), has a very small equilibrium constant, K. However, if the reaction is carried out in a strongly basic solvent such as ammonia the uride anion is stabilized, (14), and can be precipitated by cation exchange.
3.2 Salt stabilization through solvation
The following observations may be explained by a consideration of the solvation ability of the solvent.
Since silver nitrate and barium nitrate are soluble in both solvents, the dierences must be due to dierences in the solubility of the chlorides in each solvent. A consideration of the relative stability of solid silver chloride versus the solvated species (Figure 2) shows that the enthalpy of solvation in water is less than the lattice energy. Thus, if silver chloride were present as Ag+^ and Cl-^ in water it would spontaneously precipitate. In contrast, the enthalpy of solvation in ammonia is greater than the lattice energy, thus solid AgCl will dissolve readily in liquid ammonia. The reason for the extra stabilization from the specic solvation of the silver cation by the ammonia, i.e., the formation of the covalent complex [Ag(NH 3 ) 2 ]+.
Figure 2: Enthalpy of solvation of silver chloride in water and ammonia in comparison to the lattice energy.
As may be seen from Figure 3, the opposite eect occurs for barium chloride. Here the enthalpy of solvation in ammonia is less than the lattice energy. Thus, if barium chloride were present as Ba2+^ and Cl- in ammonia it would spontaneously precipitate. In contrast, the enthalpy of solvation in water is greater than the lattice energy, thus solid BaCl 2 will dissolve readily in water. The stabilization of Ba2+(aq) occurs because water will have a larger sphere of non-specic solvation as a consequence of having two lone pairs, allowing interaction with the Ba2+^ as well as other water molecules (Figure 4).
Figure 3: Enthalpy of solvation of barium chloride in water and ammonia in comparison to the lattice energy.