



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A case of fraudulent misrepresentation in car sales where a used car dealership altered the mileage of a car and sold it to a customer for a higher price. the elements required for a fraudulent misrepresentation claim and applies them to the case to determine the likelihood of success for the claim. It also provides a summary of a similar case from Montana, Colorado, or California.
Typology: Essays (university)
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Brewer Automobile Sales ( a used car dealership) is selling a 2017 Subaru Outback with an odometer set at 50,000 miles for $27,000. Bill Smith comes in to the dealership looking to purchase a 2017 or 2018 Subaru Outback with low mileage. Bob from Brewer Auto shows him the above car with the 50,000 miles. Bill does not know that Brewer Auto Sales regularly alters the mileage and this particular vehicle actually has 100,000 miles on it and is worth considerably less. Bob, who alters the mileage does know that he turned back the odometer reading from the 100,000 to the 50,000. Bill purchases the vehicle and then reads an article in the paper about Brewer Automobile Sales articulating that this has been a long standing practice. Bill decides to sue Brewer Auto Sales and Bob for a civil case of fraudulent misrepresentation. Please explain the elements required for a fraudulent misrepresentation claim, then apply the facts to determine the likelihood of success for this claim to move forward. Lastly, please find a case from Montana, Colorado or California where a claim of fraudulent misrepresentation was the issue and summarize the results. Issue Spotter 3 Bill Smith purchased a 2017 Subaru Outback from Brewer Auto Sales which was advertised with 50,000 miles on the odometer. However, Bill was unaware that the car he purchased had actually had 100,000 miles on it and was worth considerably less than he had assumed. Bob from Brewer Auto had tampered with the odometer reading, and Bill later found out about this practice from an article in the paper. After learning of the dealership's fraudulent practices, Bill sued Brewer Auto Sales and Bob for civil fraud. In order for Bill Smith to succeed in a fraudulent misrepresentation claim against Brewer Auto Sales and Bob, he must be able to prove the following elements: a false representation of a material fact, knowledge of falsity, intent to deceive, justifiable reliance, and damages.
First, Bill must show that Brewer Auto Sales and Bob made a false representation of the material fact that the 2017 Subaru Outback had 50,000 miles on it when it actually had 100, miles. In this case, Bob told Bill that the car had 50,000 miles that Bill relied on in purchasing this vehicle when its value was worth less than the actual price Bill paid for it. This is a false representation of a material fact, as mileage is a primary factor in determining the value of a used car. Additionally, Bill must show that he relied on the false representation when making the purchase decision, which he did by purchasing the vehicle. Second, Bill must prove that Brewer Auto Sales and Bob (the defendant) had knowledge of the falsity of the statements they made. Bob was aware that Brewer Auto Sales had been practicing altering the mileage of vehicles for a long time, and that in this particular case, the odometer had been rolled back from 100,000 miles to 50,000 miles. This knowledge of falsity is the key element needed to prove a fraudulent misrepresentation claim. Third, the intent to deceive element required for this fraudulent misrepresentation claim is demonstrated by Brewer Automobile Sales and Bob's knowledge that he had turned back the odometer reading from 100,000 to 50,000 to make it appear as if the car had lower mileage than it actually did. Bob's intent to deceive Bill is evident in his misrepresentation of the vehicle's mileage and his attempt to mislead Bill into believing the vehicle was worth more than it was. Fourth, the justifiable reliance element required for a fraudulent misrepresentation claim for this case is that Bill Smith was justified in his reliance on the misrepresentation made by Bob from Brewer Auto Sales. In order for Bill to succeed in this case, he must prove that he reasonably relied upon Bob’s statement that the car had 50,000 miles on it and that he suffered damages because of his reliance. Bill would need to demonstrate that a reasonable person in his position would have believed Bob’s statement and acted in reliance upon it.
result, Robinson was misled into entering into a loan agreement he would not have entered into if he had known the truth. The court held that these false statements constituted fraudulent misrepresentation and that Robinson was entitled to relief. The court found in favor of Robinson, ruling that Bank of America had made false representations to him and that he was entitled to damages.
Works Cited Perell, Paul M. "The Fraud Elements of Deceit and Fraudulent Misrepresentation." Advoc. Q. 18 (1996): 23. “Fraudulent Misrepresentation.” Legal Information Institute , Legal Information Institute, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fraudulent_misrepresentation. JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge. “Robinson V. Bank of America.” Legal Research Tools from Casetext , 6 Jan. 2014 “Fraudulent Misrepresentation Remedies.” UpCounsel , https://www.upcounsel.com/fraudulent- misrepresentation-remedies.