Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Diversity & Federal Question Jurisdiction: A Guide to US Civil Procedure, Lecture notes of Civil procedure

1L/2L civil Procedure outline for law students

Typology: Lecture notes

2018/2019

Uploaded on 04/17/2019

stephanie.adelson
stephanie.adelson 🇺🇸

5

(1)

3 documents

1 / 7

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Diversity Jurisdiction USC 1332:
Diversity between P’s and D’s
Amount in Controversy must exceed $75,000
Domicile: Gordon Rule
Takes up residence in a different state and;
Intends to remain there indefinitely
*A person does not lose citizenship in one state until the person gains citizenship in another.
Mas Case:
SMJ cannot be waived and can be raised at any time through the end of appeals.
Amount in controversy is met if it is plausible P could recover that amount.
Corporations:
A corporation is a citizen of every state it has its principal place of business and
incorporation.
Hertz Test (Nerve Center):
Principal place of business is where control and coordination of the corporation
takes place and where its executives make decisions.
Amount in Controversy:
St Paul Mercury Rule: Allegations made in good faith are accepted even if the P
doesn’t recover more than the amount in controversy requirement.
Diefenthal: The amount was not made in good faith according to the St. Paul
Mercury Rule.
Aggregation:
Single P v Single D even if the claims are unrelated. Not allowed with multiple
parties.
Tag Along P: Where one party has the amount in controversy and a second P tags along but
does not meet the amount in controversy.
Federal Question Jurisdiction USC 1331:
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under
the constitution, laws, or treatise of the US.
Well Pleaded Complaint: The federal question must be part of the well pleaded complaint
and appear prima facie. It shall not be a defense or counter-claim.
Lack of Federal SMJ:
May be raised for the first time on appeal.
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Diversity & Federal Question Jurisdiction: A Guide to US Civil Procedure and more Lecture notes Civil procedure in PDF only on Docsity!

Diversity Jurisdiction USC 1332:

  • Diversity between P’s and D’s
  • Amount in Controversy must exceed $75,

Domicile: Gordon Rule

  • Takes up residence in a different state and;
  • **Intends to remain there indefinitely *** A person does not lose citizenship in one state until the person gains citizenship in another.

Mas Case:

  • SMJ cannot be waived and can be raised at any time through the end of appeals.
  • Amount in controversy is met if it is plausible P could recover that amount.

Corporations:

  • (^) A corporation is a citizen of every state it has its principal place of business and incorporation.

Hertz Test (Nerve Center):

  • Principal place of business is where control and coordination of the corporation takes place and where its executives make decisions.

Amount in Controversy:

  • St Paul Mercury Rule: Allegations made in good faith are accepted even if the P doesn’t recover more than the amount in controversy requirement.
  • (^) Diefenthal: The amount was not made in good faith according to the St. Paul Mercury Rule.

Aggregation:

  • Single P v Single D even if the claims are unrelated. Not allowed with multiple parties.

Tag Along P: Where one party has the amount in controversy and a second P tags along but does not meet the amount in controversy.

Federal Question Jurisdiction USC 1331:

  • The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the constitution, laws, or treatise of the US.

Well Pleaded Complaint: The federal question must be part of the well pleaded complaint and appear prima facie. It shall not be a defense or counter-claim. Lack of Federal SMJ:

  • May be raised for the first time on appeal.
  • May be raised by the court sua sponte.

Holmes Test:

  • Suit arises under the law that creates the CoA.

***** Declaratory judgements do not give rise to federal question because they are pleaded by the D in a civil action.

Embedded Federal Issue:

  • Law creates the CoA (Holmes Test)
  • The P right to relief depends upon resolving a substantial issue of federal law

Grable Factors:

  • Is resolution of the fed issue necessary to resolve the case?
  • (^) Is the Fed issue actually disputed in the case?
  • How important or substantial is the Fed issue to the Fed Government?
  • Will subjecting the case to Fed jurisdiction upset the “balance of fed and state judicial responsibilities?”

Removal USC 1441:

  • Removal is initiated by the D or D’s in a case to any district court which have original jurisdiction.
  • Forum D rule prevents removal where a case is filed in the home state of a D.
  • Under 1446(b)(1): Notice of removal of a civil action shall be filed within 30 days after the receipt by the D…of a copy of the initial pleading.
  • If not done within 30 days, removal is waived.
  • Diversity cases, the case is not removable after one year unless the P acted in bad *faith to prevent removal. After removal the P has 30 days to raise procedural problems and they may raise jurisdictional defects at any time before final judgement.
  • When dealing with more than one D all must assent to removal.
  • P may move to remand but it must occur within 30 days after the filing of the notice of removal.

Personal Jurisdiction:

  • Due process under the 14 th^ Amendment requires that “no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
  • P was allowed to sue because the sources, harm, and target audience was in CA even though the article was written in FL.

Burger King:

  • (^) Negotiations
  • Future Consequences
  • Training
  • Provisions of the K (choice of law, where the activities related to the contract were to take place)
  • Course of Dealing

Asahi & Stream of Commerce:

  • O’Connor stated SoC by itself is not enough to establish minimum contacts. SoC+
  • Brennan’s bitch ass view says SoC is enough to establish minimum contacts.

Arise Out Of:

  • Evidence Test: A claim arises out of the D in state contacts only if the D contacts offer evidence for at least one of the elements of the claim.
  • But for Test: But for the D’s contact with the forum, the claim would not have arisen.

Zippo Test:

  • Interactive Site
  • Passive site
  • (^) Interactive sites that only exchange information

General IPJ:

  • Principal Place of Business
  • Place of Incorporation
  • Physical Presence only in exceptional circumstances; and
  • PJ must be consistent with notions of fair play and substantial justice (probably)

Daimler:

  • Established that a corporation must be at home to have GIPJ Types of PJ: In Personam: Where judgement is against all worldly assets

In Rem: Where jurisdiction is over property for purposes of declaring ownership of interest in property with respect to the world. SM is the property itself. EX. Probate

Quasi In Rem I: Jurisdiction over property to find who has interest in the property but not over the property itself. EX Foreclosure action.

Quasi In Rem II: Jurisdiction over property for purposes of providing a remedy in an unrelated action.

Post Judgement Attachment: A seizure to collect a judgement that D refuses to pay.

Prejudgment Attachment for Security: Exactly what it sounds like.

Schaffer & QIR: Must follow the International Shoe standards set forth with contacts and its progeny.

Burnham (Tag Jurisdiction):

  • Court stated that “transient presence” is still a basis for establishing IPJ.
  • Scalia stated like a boss that it was permissible at the time the 14th^ Amendment was drafted.
  • Once again Brennan’s bitch ass opinion requires that you have all these elements and time and nonsense.

Consent to PJ:

  • D can decide to not raise the issue
  • Parties can consent to PJ through their conduct
  • A D can consent to PJ before a lawsuit occurs through a “forum selection clause” in a K

Long Arm Statute:

  • Due Process Clause of the 14th^ Amendment is a limit on a court’s power over an individual, not an authorization to exercise that power.
  • (^) PJ must be consistent with the state long arm statute.
  • PJ must be consistent with the Due Process Clause

Mullane (Service of Process):

  • Due Process allows for notice to all parties involved so that they may have an opportunity to present their objections.
  • Where the names and addresses of those affected are at hand it is reasonable to mail or personally deliver notice.

Notice:

  • Constitutional requirement/Due Process Clause

28 USC 1406:

a. The district court of a district in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.

Limits on Intersystem Transfers:

  • A judge only has the authority to transfer cases within the same court system.
  • A federal court judge can transfer a case
    • From one federal court to any other federal court in any state;
    • But not to a state court

*Venue, like PJ can be waived. Parties may waive proper venue through a forum selection clause.

Piper Private/Public Interest:

  1. P choice of forum, unless the balance of convenience is strongly in favor of the D’s;
  2. D choice of forum
  3. Whether the claim arose elsewhere;
  4. Convenience of the Parties
  5. Convenience of the witnesses; and
  6. Ease of access to source of proof.

*Wins on foreign non-convenience.

Public Interest:

  1. The transferee’s familiarity with the governing laws;
  2. The relative congestion of the calendars of the potential transferee and transferor courts; and
  3. The local interest in deciding local controversies at home.