Download CJ 405 Investigations Final Exam: Verified Solutions and more Exams Nursing in PDF only on Docsity!
CJ 405 Investigations FINAL EXAM
VERIFIED SOLUTIONS, SCORED A+
What .are .the .five .ways .to .conduct .a .search .without .a .search .warrant? .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-(1) .search .incident .to .arrest, .(2) .automobile .searches, .(3) .emergencies .and .exigent .circumstances, .(4) .hot .pursuit, .and .(5) .consent
What .are .the .nine .searches .that .aren't .really .searches? .- .CORRECT .ANSWER- (1) .abandoned .property, .(2) .open .fields, .(3) .aerial .surveillance, .(4) .public .places .or .open .view, .(5) .plain .view, .(6) .plain .touch, .(7) .private .searches, .(8) .chemical .field .tests, .and .(9) .canine .sniffs
To .obtain .a .search .warrant, .officers .must .have .__________________. .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-PROBABLE .CAUSE
What .is .probable .cause .defined? .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-Requires .that .a .combination .of .facts .makes .it .more .likely .than .not .that .items .sought .are .where .the .police .believe .them .to .be
Aguilar .v. .Texas .(1964) .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-using .informants .to .establish .probable .cause .for .a .search .warrant, .here, .the .SC .adopted .a .two-pronged .test .(i.e., .the .Aguilar-Spinelli .Test); .asks .the .questions .(1) .is .the .informant .reliable/credible? .and .(2) .is .the .information .believable?
Illinois .v. .Gates .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-using .informants .to .establish .probable .cause .for .a .search .warrant; .the .SC .abandoned .the .two .pronged .test .and .went .with ."totality .of .the .circumstances"
A .search .warrant .can .be .issued .to .search .for .and .seize .the .following: .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-(1) .stolen .or .embezzled .property, .(2) .property .designed .or .intended .for .use .in .committing .a .crime, .and .(3) .property .that .indicates .a .crime .has .been .committed .or .a .particular .person .has .committed .a .crime
What .are .the .requirements .of .a .search .warrant? .(6 .items) .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-(1) .probable .cause, .(2) .the .reasons .for .requesting .it, .(3) .the .names .of .the .people .presenting .affidavits, .(4) .what .is .specifically .being .sought, .(5) .an .address .and .description .of .the .location, .and .(6) .a .judge's .signature
Wilson .v. .Arkansas .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-"knock .and .announce" .rule .made .a .constituional .mandate
United .States .v. .Banks .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-an .officer .must .knock .and .announce .and .wait .approximately. 15 .to. 20 .seconds .later, .the .officer .states .the .purpose .of .the .search, .and .the .officer .gives .a .copy .of .the .search .warrant .to .the .person .responsible .for .the .residence
Richard .v. .Wisconsin .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-no-knock .exception; .may .be .issued .if .evidence .may .be .easily .destroyed .or .if .there .is .advance .knowledge .of .explosives .or .other .specific .danger .to .an .officer
Can .law .enforcement .invite .the .media .along .to .a .search .warrant? .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-NO
Michigan .v. .Summers .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-allows .officers .to .detain .persons .at .the .location .of .the .search .warrant .while .the .search .is .being .conducted
Illinois .v. .McArthur .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-allows .officers .to .require .residents .to .remain .outside .of .their .home .until .a .search .warrant .can .be .obtained .(2 .hour .detention)
Chimel .v. .California .(1969) .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-established .that .a .search .incidental .to .a .lawful .arrest .must .be .made .simultaneously .with .the .arrest .and .must .be .confined .to .the .area .within .the .suspect's .immediate .control
Maryland .v. .Buie .(1990) .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-the .SC .added .authority .for .the .police .to .search .areas .immediately .adjoining .the .place .of .arrest .to .serve .as .a .protective .sweep
New .York .v. .Belton .(1981) .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-if .the .arrest .takes .place .in .or .near .an .automobile, .you .may, .incident .to .arrest, .search .the .passenger .compartment .and .any .containers .you .find .inside; .NO .TRUNK
Katz .v. .United .States .(1967) .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-plain .view .doctine .--> .police .may .lawfully .seize .that .which .is .in .their .plain .view .from .a .lawful .vantage .point, .without .first .obtaining .a .warrant
What .are .the. 3 .factors .required .for .plain .view? .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-(1) .object .must .be .visible .from .place .where .the .officer .has .a .lawful .right .to .be, .(2) .incriminating .nature .of .the .object .must .be .immediately .clear .without .need .for .moving .or .in .any .way .disturbing .the .object, .and .(3) .the .officer .must .be .able .to .access .the .items .without .violating .the .Fourth .Amendment
Carroll .v. .United .States .(1925) .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-automobiles .may .be .searched .without .a .warrant .if .(1) .there .is .probable .cause .for .the .search .and .(2) .the .vehicle .would .be .gone .before .a .search .warrant .could .be .obtained; .INCLUDES .TRUNK
Wyoming .v. .Houghton .(1999) .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-an .officer .may .search .the .belongings .of .an .automobile .passenger .if .the .officer .has .probable .cause .to .search .the .vehicle, .i.e., .passenger .property .exception
Mapp .v. .Ohio .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-established .the .exclusionary .rule; ."fruit-of- the-poisonous-tree .doctrine"
What .are .the .two .exceptions .to .the .Exclusionary .Rule? .- .CORRECT .ANSWER- (1) .inevitable .discovery .doctrine .and .(2) .good .faith .doctrine)
What .is .the .Inevitable .Discovery .Doctrine? .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-established .that .if .illegally .obtained .evidence .would .in .all .likelihood .eventually .have .been .discovered .legally, .it .may .be .used
What .is .the .Good .Faith .Doctrine? .- .CORRECT .ANSWER-established .that .illegally .obtained .evidence .may .be .admissible .if .the .police .were .truly .not .aware .they .were .violating .a .suspect's .Fourth .Amendment .rights
