

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A comprehensive comparison of drug master file (dmf) systems in the united states, european union, and japan. It outlines key differences in nomenclature, ownership, structure, submission, review, fees, impact on global strategy, data requirements, regulatory interpretations, and harmonization efforts. Valuable for pharmacy students seeking to understand the complexities of drug regulatory processes in different regions.
Typology: Summaries
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Practical- 18 Date. 13 /12/ Faculty of Pharmacy, Marwadi University Aim: Comparative Study of DMF system in US, EU and Japan. Sr. No. Particulars UNITED STATES EUROPEAN UNION
1. Nomenclature Drug Master File Active Substance Master File Drug Substance Manufacturing and Control Information 2. Ownership Drug substance manufacturer Drug product manufacturer (generally) Either drug substance or drug product manufacturer (often API supplier) 3. Structure & Content Unstructured, manufacturer determines content Defined format with specific modules for different data categories Specific format, but allows more flexibility than EU ASMF 4. Submission & Review Voluntary, reviewed only when referenced in NDA Mandatory for centralized MAAs, optional for national MAAs Voluntary, encouraged for imported drug substances, reviewed when referenced in drug application 5. Fees & Maintenance Annual maintenance fees, no submission fees No fees for submission or maintenance No fees for submission or maintenance 6. Impact on Global Strategy Flexibility, suitable for global Standardized format simplifies global submissions Voluntary nature offers flexibility but may
Practical- 18 Date. 13 /12/ Faculty of Pharmacy, Marwadi University submissions with adjustments but requires adaptation necessitate additional data for other markets
7. Data Requirements & Expectations Differ across regions Harmonized across EU member states Varied; PMDA guidance documents available 8. Regulatory Interpretations & Enforcement Can vary Consistent across EU member states Can vary 9. Harmonization Efforts Ongoing, slow progress Ongoing, slow progress Ongoing, slow progress