Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Comparison of Marketing Authorization Procedures in the European Union, Summaries of Pharmacy

Title: Comparison of Marketing Authorization Procedures in the European Union Document Type: Practical Report / Academic Assignment Course: Regulatory Affairs / Pharmaceutical Regulatory Science This academic practical report provides a comparative study of the four major marketing authorization procedures in the European Union (EU): Centralized Procedure (CP) Mutual Recognition Procedure (MRP) Decentralized Procedure (DCP) National Procedure The report is organized in a table format to allow a clear and structured comparison across various aspects of each procedure.

Typology: Summaries

2024/2025

Available from 04/13/2025

heli-patel-6
heli-patel-6 🇮🇳

5 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Practical-17 Date.13/12/2023
Faculty of Pharmacy, Marwadi University
Aim : Comparison study of Marketing authorization procedure in EU.
Feature
Centralized
Procedure (CP)
Mutual
Recognition
Procedure (MRP)
Decentralized
Procedure
(DCP)
National
Procedure
Who can use
it?
Mandatory for
certain types of
products, optional
for others
Products already
authorized in at
least one EU
member state
Products not
yet authorized
in any EU
member state
-
Process
Single application
to EMA
Reference member
state (RMS)
assessment with
potential
objections from
other member
states (CMS)
Similar to
MRP, but for
products not
yet authorized
in any EU
member state
-
Timeline
270 days
(extendable)
210 days
(extendable)
210 days
(extendable)
-
Advantages
Harmonized
assessment, faster
access to market,
single MA for all
EU member states
Lower fees than
CP, faster than
DCP for certain
products
Lower fees
than CP and
MRP, can be
used for new
products
-
Disadvantages
Higher fees, less
flexibility for
national
considerations
Potential for delays
due to objections
from CMS,
separate national
MAs for each
participating
member state
Similar to
MRP, but for
new products
-
Format and
Language
eCTD Format and
English
national formats
and English and
national
formats and
National
formats and
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Comparison of Marketing Authorization Procedures in the European Union and more Summaries Pharmacy in PDF only on Docsity!

Aim : Comparison study of Marketing authorization procedure in EU. Feature Centralized Procedure (CP) Mutual Recognition Procedure (MRP) Decentralized Procedure (DCP) National Procedure Who can use it? Mandatory for certain types of products, optional for others Products already authorized in at least one EU member state Products not yet authorized in any EU member state

Process Single application to EMA Reference member state (RMS) assessment with potential objections from other member states (CMS) Similar to MRP, but for products not yet authorized in any EU member state

Timeline 270 days (extendable) 210 days (extendable) 210 days (extendable)

Advantages Harmonized assessment, faster access to market, single MA for all EU member states Lower fees than CP, faster than DCP for certain products Lower fees than CP and MRP, can be used for new products

Disadvantages Higher fees, less flexibility for national considerations Potential for delays due to objections from CMS, separate national MAs for each participating member state Similar to MRP, but for new products

Format and Language eCTD Format and English national formats and English and national formats and National formats and

languages of participating member states English and languages of participating member states National Languages Module 1 Comprehensive administrative information Updated administrative information for new member states Full administrative information for all participating member states Varies depending on national requirements Module 2 SmPCs in all EU languages SmPCs in languages of participating member states SmPCs in languages of all participating member states Required in national language Module 3 Extensive quality data on manufacturing, control, and stability Updated quality data for new sites or product changes Complete quality data for all new sites and processes Varies depending on national requirements Module 4 Full non-clinical and clinical study reports Summaries of relevant data supporting existing authorization Full non- clinical and clinical study reports for new markets Full reports or summaries depending on national requirements Module 5 Comprehensive risk management plan Updated risk management plan for new concerns Complete risk management plan for all participating member states Varies depending on national requirements