

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Title: Comparison of Marketing Authorization Procedures in the European Union Document Type: Practical Report / Academic Assignment Course: Regulatory Affairs / Pharmaceutical Regulatory Science This academic practical report provides a comparative study of the four major marketing authorization procedures in the European Union (EU): Centralized Procedure (CP) Mutual Recognition Procedure (MRP) Decentralized Procedure (DCP) National Procedure The report is organized in a table format to allow a clear and structured comparison across various aspects of each procedure.
Typology: Summaries
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Aim : Comparison study of Marketing authorization procedure in EU. Feature Centralized Procedure (CP) Mutual Recognition Procedure (MRP) Decentralized Procedure (DCP) National Procedure Who can use it? Mandatory for certain types of products, optional for others Products already authorized in at least one EU member state Products not yet authorized in any EU member state
Process Single application to EMA Reference member state (RMS) assessment with potential objections from other member states (CMS) Similar to MRP, but for products not yet authorized in any EU member state
Timeline 270 days (extendable) 210 days (extendable) 210 days (extendable)
Advantages Harmonized assessment, faster access to market, single MA for all EU member states Lower fees than CP, faster than DCP for certain products Lower fees than CP and MRP, can be used for new products
Disadvantages Higher fees, less flexibility for national considerations Potential for delays due to objections from CMS, separate national MAs for each participating member state Similar to MRP, but for new products
Format and Language eCTD Format and English national formats and English and national formats and National formats and
languages of participating member states English and languages of participating member states National Languages Module 1 Comprehensive administrative information Updated administrative information for new member states Full administrative information for all participating member states Varies depending on national requirements Module 2 SmPCs in all EU languages SmPCs in languages of participating member states SmPCs in languages of all participating member states Required in national language Module 3 Extensive quality data on manufacturing, control, and stability Updated quality data for new sites or product changes Complete quality data for all new sites and processes Varies depending on national requirements Module 4 Full non-clinical and clinical study reports Summaries of relevant data supporting existing authorization Full non- clinical and clinical study reports for new markets Full reports or summaries depending on national requirements Module 5 Comprehensive risk management plan Updated risk management plan for new concerns Complete risk management plan for all participating member states Varies depending on national requirements