

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
ROLE AND THE MECHANISM OF CONCILITION MACHINERY .
Typology: Assignments
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Question. Explain the mechanism of conciliation machinery and its role in the settlement of industrial dispute. ANS. Conciliation is a dispute resolution mechanism which is broadly and globally to settle disputes. It is referred to in case of the desire to reach an amicable way of resolving disputes for example, business disputes. Dispute resolution mechanisms that are used in the international sphere can be classified into two categories, adjudicative and diplomatic resolution mechanisms. Adjudicative mechanisms are those involving a neutral third party who resolves the issue by rendering a decision that is binding on the parties, for example, judicial settlement and arbitration. In contrast, the diplomatic mechanisms of dispute resolution, some of which involve a third party, result in outcomes that are always non-binding in effect. Diplomatic mechanisms of settlement can be divided into two branches; on the one hand those that involve only the parties of the disputes themselves, for example, negotiations and consultations and those that engage a third party in the process on the behest of or with the consent of the disputants, for example, conciliation mediation, good offices and inquiry. This paper focuses on conciliation as a diplomatic mechanism of foreign direct investment dispute settlement. First, it sheds light on the nature and elements of conciliation compared to other mechanisms that engage a third party, mainly mediation. Second, it identifies the major advantages of conciliation. Third, it identifies cautions that accompany resorting to conciliation as a dispute resolution mechanism. Fourth, it identifies some concluding remarks. Conciliation is a Peaceful Means to Settle Disputes : Conciliation is a peaceful means to settle disputes arising between the parties, and remove the problems that prevent the execution and completion of their relationships. Conciliation is not considered a legal or judicial means adopted to resolve disputes arising between parties; rather it is the most feasible mechanism by which decision is made through the parties' agreement and consent. Since conciliation aims, like all peaceful mechanisms, to settle existing disputes, it is also distinguished by being a primarily peaceful mechanism to
resolve them. This feature may make conciliation not subject to the judiciary control; the conciliator's attempts are not subject to the judiciary control in general. ROLE OF CONCILIATION MACHINERY IN THE SETTLE- MENT OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE
achieve. Many countries produce conciliation due to its advantages presented in avoiding lengthening the dispute procedures, not being preoccupied by formalities, and finding a solution which ends the dispute and does not allow its appeal throughthe parties’ direct participation in all procedures, exchanging points of views, and reaching a satisfactory solution. Conciliation fulfills the parties' desires in getting medial justice, which is achieved through getting a quick settlement by simple procedures and the parties' effective participation. Thus, conciliation leads to shortening the time; this might be due to the simplicity of its procedures OR the mechanism, by which this operation occurs, helps to a large extent in the speed of settling rights and satisfying the parties.
do not think of settling their current dispute at the time of the dispute, but rather they consider their future relationships. The settlement they reach expresses the parties' satisfaction and persuasion. The solution is not imposed on the parties, which allows conciliation to maintain the peaceful relationships between the disputants.
the damages resulting from the contractual relationships, but also at finding a kind of balance or equality between the parties' obligations. This ability springs from the conciliator's style of work; eventually, he reaches solutions which express the disputing parties' satisfaction and which are clear in the efforts he exerts attempting to approximate the different points of view, reaching its final settlement.