

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The concept of confession in criminal law, specifically under the qanoon-e-shahadat order (qso) 1984 in pakistan. It provides an overview of the legal provisions related to confessions, including the admissibility and relevance of confessions, the value of confessions made in police custody, and the principles for recording confessions. The document highlights the importance of following proper procedures and safeguards to ensure the voluntariness and reliability of confessions. It also discusses the role of magistrates in recording confessions and the inadmissibility of confessions made before police officers. The document serves as a comprehensive guide on the legal aspects of confessions in criminal proceedings, making it a valuable resource for students, legal professionals, and researchers interested in criminal law and evidence.
Typology: Cheat Sheet
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
In criminal cases, a confession is a statement made by a guilty person that either admits the offense in terms or substantially admits all the facts that constitute the offense. The Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order (QSO) 1984 does not provide a clear definition of confession, but the gist of the related Articles (37-45) is that a confession is a statement made by a guilty person voluntarily and without any undue influence in front of a person who has the authority to take it. The confession should not include any compromise, threats, promises, or benefits given in exchange.
The admissibility and relevancy of a confession depend on the facts of each case. A confession would be inadmissible if its making appears to the court to have been caused by any inducement, threat, or promise, or if it is made before a police officer or when the accused was in police custody.
According to Article 38 and 40 of the QSO 1984, the determination of the admissibility or otherwise of a confession is left solely to the court. Confession made while in police custody is not admissible, as stated in the High Court Rules and Orders, Volume II, Chapter 13.
Article 38 of the QSO 1984 states that a confession made before a police officer cannot be used against the accused. This is the case even if the accused was unaware that the person to whom they confessed was a police officer. Additionally, under Article 39, a confession made by an accused person while in police custody cannot be proved against them unless it is made in the immediate presence of a magistrate.
Article 40 of the QSO 1984 states that if a confession of the accused is supported by the discovery of a fact, it may be presumed to be true and not to have been extracted. This provision comes into operation only if:
There must be a fact discovered. The fact must have been discovered in consequence of some information received from the accused.
The person from whom the information is received must not only be an accused but must also be in the custody of the police.
The information sought to be used in evidence must distinctly relate to the fact discovered.
There are several principles and formalities to be followed by the authorized person (generally a magistrate) when recording a confession:
The confession should be recorded at an early stage. The handcuffs should be removed from the accused before recording the confession. The police officials present in the courtroom should be sent out. The magistrate should explain to the accused that they are appearing before a magistrate. The accused should be informed that the statement may be used against them. The accused should be asked if they have been induced by the police to make the statement. The accused should be given sufficient time to ponder over the matter. The accused should be asked again if they are willing to give the statement. The accused should be remanded to judicial custody. The statement should not be recorded on oath, as a confession recorded on oath is irrelevant and inadmissible. After recording the confessional statement, some corroborative prosecution evidence must be recorded.