






























Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The concept of framing theory in news journalism, its significance in shaping public perception, and various framing devices used in media coverage. Framing theory helps us understand how journalists select and present information, influencing how we interpret events and issues. The document also discusses the impact of framing on public discourse and provides examples of framing in action.
What you will learn
Typology: Slides
1 / 38
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Framing theory
Framing theory - or theories about framing - today represent one of the most common research approaches in the field of communication and media studies.
The origins of the frame metaphor lie in other fields like cognitive psychology, anthropology (Bateson) and sociology (Goffman).
A frame specifies the relationship between a number of connected elements in a text, helping us to define or interpret what is going on, making sense out of events
A Swedish example
Expressen (18.9.2001): 47% against US attack in Afghanistan. DN (27.9.2001): “Seven out of ten support US attack”
Expressen‟s question: Do you find it right wrong that the US invade Afghanistan with military troops?
DN‟s question: Do you find it right or wrong of prime minister Persson and the other prime ministers to support the US‟s right to attack?
Media frames (Todd Gitlin, 1980)
“What makes the world beyond direct experience look natural is a media frame”.
“Frames are principles of selection, emphasis, and presentation composed of little tacit theories about what exists, what happens and what matters”
“Thus for organizational reasons alone, frames are unavoidable, and journalism is organized to regulate their production”
Defining framing
“Frames are organizing principles that are socially shared and persistent over time, that work symbolically to meaningfully structure the social world” (Stephen D. Reese (2001: 11) in Reese, Gandy & Grant (eds.):
“To frame is to select some aspects of a perceived reality and make them more salient in a communicating text” (Robert Entman 1993: 52)
“The essence of framing is selection to prioritize some facts, images or developments over others, thereby unconsciously promoting one particular interpretation of events (Norris, Kern & Just
How frames work
“The frame suggests what the controversy is about, the essence of the issue” (Gamson & Modigliani 1989, in Vreese: 27)
Frames are ..interpretative packages that give meaning to an issue (Gamson & Modigliani, 1989: 3)
Framing involves implicit information between the lines, the frame provides a context for the interpretation of a news message
Choosing the news angle
Journalistens vinkling kan sammenlignes med:
”…en tøjsnor, hvor kun de relevante stykker information er hængt til tørre, og den hjælper på den måde journalisten at strukturere informationerne omkring en central ide og er dermed også med at koncentrere læserens opmærksomhed om de udvalgte sider av emnet.” Mogens Meilby (1996): Journalistikkens grundtrin. Århus: Ajour.
Framing contests
The frame building process takes place in a continuous interaction between journalists and elites and social movements. The outcomes of the frame-building process are the frames manifest in the text (Vreese 2003: 24, 43)
If politicians or PR-practitioners are to succeed getting their frames wholly or partly presented in the media, they have to adhere to certain news conventions and genre demands from commercial news organisations giving priority to conflicts, power struggles and drama (Allern 2001, Ihlen & Allern 2007)
..the cultural approach
3 The use of frames seem normal, natural and the social construction are often invisible. Frames as a power mechanism.
4 Frames are part of the culture, more stable than personal schemata
5 A frame changes gradually or little over time
6 Frames are negotiated and part of a social interaction
Frames are not the same as topics
Topic : Asylum seekers and undocumented immigrants
Alternative frames (van Gorp 2007):
Misgovernment frame
Intruder/strangers frame
Our hospitality frame
The innocent victim frame
The donor/support frame
The “not in my backyard” frame
Bali, Moscow Theatre, Mombasa
hotel: The same Story?
Framing early student protest against the war against Vietnam (1965)
Todd Gitlin: The whole world is watching (1980): analyzing the earliest framing devices in main stream media outlets.
“15000 White House pickets denounce Vietnam War”
Framing the WTO
“A few Starbucks windows smashed by a hundred „anarchists‟ where all the shallower news reports needed to see to decide “what‟s the story”, even if tens or hundreds of thousands of demonstrators were marching by playfully, in peace” (Todd Gitlin about Seattle 1999)
Contrasting guilt and innocence
Robert Entman (in Projections of Power, 2004), comparing the media coverage of a Soviet Air Force Fighter who shot down Korean Air Flight 007 (1983, killing 269 people) and the coverage of a US Navy Ship (Vincennes) who in 1988 shot down an Iranian Air Flight 655 (killing 290).
The media framing varied dramatically. Soviet covered with “the murder frame”, US by the “technical glitch frame”. Contrasting magnitude, causes and the use of humanizing or neutral terms (quantitatively)