Docsity
Log inSign up
Docsity
Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity

Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan

Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips
Sell on Docsity
Sell on Docsity
Log inSign up

Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity

Find documents

Prepare for your exams with the study notes shared by other students like you on Docsity

Search Store documents

The best documents sold by students who completed their studies

Search through all study resources
Docsity AINEW

Summarize your documents, ask them questions, convert them into quizzes and concept maps

Explore questions

Clear up your doubts by reading the answers to questions asked by your fellow students

Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan

Share documents
download point icon20 Points

For each uploaded document

Answer questions
download point icon5 Points

For each given answer (max 1 per day)

All the ways to get free points
Get points immediately

Choose a premium plan with all the points you need

Study Opportunities

Choose your next study program

Get in touch with the best universities in the world. Search through thousands of universities and official partners

Community

Ask the community

Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts

University Rankings

Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users

Free resources

Our save-the-student-ebooks!

Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors

From our blog

Exams and Study
Go to the blog

Exploring the Feature Comparison Model in Smartphone Purchase Decisions, Exams of Cognitive Psychology

Vels Institute of Science, Technology & Advanced StudiesCognitive Psychology

A research design to investigate the efficacy of the feature comparison model (fcm) in understanding consumer decision-making processes when purchasing smartphones. The study aims to explore the cognitive processes underlying smartphone purchase decisions by combining quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative component will involve a survey to assess feature importance and brand/model selection, while the qualitative component will consist of in-depth interviews to gain deeper insights into participants' thought processes. The integration of these findings is expected to provide a comprehensive understanding of how the fcm applies in real-world smartphone purchase decisions. The research design also discusses potential limitations and future research directions, making it a valuable resource for researchers and marketers interested in consumer behavior in the smartphone industry.

Typology: Exams

2023/2024

Uploaded on 05/10/2024

rinthiya-m-btech-cse-ai-and-ml
rinthiya-m-btech-cse-ai-and-ml 🇮🇳

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
CAT 2 – COGNITIVE LEARNING
15 MARKS
1.Scenario: Imagine you are tasked with conducting a study to investigate
the efficacy of a feature comparison model in explaining how individuals
make decisions when purchasing smartphones. Your study aims to delve into
the cognitive processes underlying consumer decision-making by utilizing the
feature comparison model as the theoretical framework.
Question: Design a research study to explore the application of the feature
comparison model in understanding consumer behavior when purchasing
smartphones.
Research Design: Exploring Feature Comparison Model in Smartphone
Purchase Decisions
Theoretical Framework: Feature Comparison Model (FCM)
Research Objective: Investigate the efficacy of the FCM in explaining
consumer decision-making processes when purchasing smartphones.
Methodology: This study will employ a mixed-methods approach, combining
quantitative and qualitative data collection methods.
Participants:
• Quantitative: A sample of smartphone users (150-200) will be recruited
through online surveys or mobile app questionnaires. Demographic
information (age, gender, income) and smartphone usage habits will be
collected.
• Qualitative: In-depth interviews will be conducted with a smaller group
(10-15) of participants selected from the quantitative sample. Interviews
will delve deeper into their thought processes during smartphone
purchases.
Data Collection:
• Quantitative: A self-administered online survey will be designed with the
following components:
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8

Partial preview of the text

Download Exploring the Feature Comparison Model in Smartphone Purchase Decisions and more Exams Cognitive Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

CAT 2 – COGNITIVE LEARNING

15 MARKS

1.Scenario: Imagine you are tasked with conducting a study to investigate the efficacy of a feature comparison model in explaining how individuals make decisions when purchasing smartphones. Your study aims to delve into the cognitive processes underlying consumer decision-making by utilizing the feature comparison model as the theoretical framework. Question: Design a research study to explore the application of the feature comparison model in understanding consumer behavior when purchasing smartphones. Research Design: Exploring Feature Comparison Model in Smartphone Purchase Decisions Theoretical Framework: Feature Comparison Model (FCM) Research Objective: Investigate the efficacy of the FCM in explaining consumer decision-making processes when purchasing smartphones. Methodology: This study will employ a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. Participants:

  • Quantitative: A sample of smartphone users (150-200) will be recruited through online surveys or mobile app questionnaires. Demographic information (age, gender, income) and smartphone usage habits will be collected.
  • Qualitative: In-depth interviews will be conducted with a smaller group (10-15) of participants selected from the quantitative sample. Interviews will delve deeper into their thought processes during smartphone purchases. Data Collection:
  • Quantitative: A self-administered online survey will be designed with the following components:

o Feature Importance Rating: Participants will rate the importance of various smartphone features (camera quality, battery life, processor speed, display size, etc.) on a Likert scale. o Brand/Model Selection Task: Participants will be presented with hypothetical smartphone purchase scenarios involving different brands/models with varying feature sets. They will choose their preferred option and explain their reasoning. o Demographics: Standard demographic information will be collected.

  • Qualitative: Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with participants who elaborate on their responses in the quantitative survey. The interviews will explore: o Thought processes during past smartphone purchases. o Criteria used for evaluating different brands/models. o The influence of marketing and advertising on their decisions. Data Analysis:
  • Quantitative: o Descriptive statistics will summarize participant demographics and feature importance ratings. o Chi-square tests or ANOVA will analyze the relationship between feature importance and brand/model selection in hypothetical scenarios.
  • Qualitative: o Interviews will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. o Thematic analysis will identify recurring themes and patterns in participants' decision-making processes. Integration of Quantitative and Qualitative Data:
  • Quantitative findings will provide an overview of feature importance and decision-making trends among participants.
  • Qualitative interviews will add depth and context by exploring the "why" behind participants' choices. Together, they will provide a more

2. Evaluate and explain the prototype approach for the semantic theory. Prototype Approach in Semantic Theory: Evaluation and Explanation The prototype approach is a prominent theory in semantics that explains how humans categorize concepts and words. It suggests that categories are not defined by strict rules or necessary and sufficient conditions, but rather by a central member, the prototype , that embodies the most characteristic features of the category. Here's a breakdown of the approach along with its strengths and weaknesses: Strengths: - Graded Membership: The prototype approach acknowledges that category membership can be graded. A robin is a more prototypical bird than a penguin, even though they both share some features of birds. - Flexibility: The theory allows for new members to be incorporated into categories as long as they share enough similarities with the prototype. This flexibility reflects the dynamic nature of language and concepts. - Psychological Plausibility: The prototype approach aligns with how humans seem to categorize things intuitively. We often have a clear image of a typical member of a category when thinking about it. Weaknesses: - Vagueness: The lack of clear boundaries can make it difficult to determine whether something belongs to a category or not. For example, is a bat a bird? It has wings, but it also has fur and flies at night. - Prototype Variability: The prototype itself can vary depending on individual experiences and cultural background. What some consider a typical "tool" might differ across cultures. - Limited Explanatory Power: While the prototype approach sheds light on how we categorize basic concepts, it may not be as effective in explaining more abstract concepts like emotions or social roles. Overall, the prototype approach offers a valuable framework for understanding semantic categorization. It captures the intuitive and flexible nature of human thought, but it's important to acknowledge its limitations. Other models like classical theory (necessary and sufficient features) or the exemplar theory (specific examples define categories) might be better suited for certain situations.

3. It is intuitively obvious that context facilitates word interpretation, but how can it interfere with interpretation? Context is crucial for understanding the meaning of words, but it can also sometimes lead us astray. Here's how context can interfere with word interpretation: 1. False Assumptions: - We might make assumptions about the context based on past experiences or stereotypes. For example, reading "He went to the bank" in a financial context implies a trip to a financial institution. However, in a different context, it could mean going to the edge of a river. 2. Homophones and Polysemy: - Homophones (words that sound the same but have different meanings) and polysemy (words with multiple meanings) can be confusing, especially when context isn't clear. "Bat" could refer to a flying mammal or a baseball tool. 3. Cultural and Background Differences: - Cultural references or slang might be misinterpreted by someone unfamiliar with that specific context. An idiom like "kick the bucket" might be confusing to someone who doesn't know it means "to die." 4. Sarcasm and Humor: - Written text lacks nonverbal cues like tone of voice, making it difficult to detect sarcasm or humor. "That went well," could be genuine or sarcastic depending on the context. 5. Overlapping Meanings: - Sometimes, multiple interpretations of a word fit within the context, leading to ambiguity. "He dressed sharply" could mean he was well- dressed or used a sharp object like a knife. Here are some strategies to avoid these pitfalls: - Consider Multiple Meanings: Be aware of homophones and polysemy. Look for clues in the surrounding text or consult a dictionary if needed. - Identify Cultural References: Pay attention to specific details that might indicate a cultural reference you might not understand.

Here are some key models that explain content selection:

  • Information Processing Model: This model views conversation as an exchange of information, where speakers consider the recipient's knowledge and adjust their message accordingly.
  • Gricean Maxims: These principles of conversation by H.P. Grice suggest speakers strive to be clear, relevant, informative, and truthful, influencing content selection.
  • Cognitive Theory of Mind: This theory suggests we consider the mental state (beliefs, desires) of the listener to tailor our message for effective communication. (ii) How Speech Errors Show Systematic Patterns Speech errors, often called "slips of the tongue," are fascinating because they're not random. They reveal underlying patterns in how our brains process language:
  • Phonemic Slips: These errors involve swapping sounds within or between words (e.g., "shoving leopard" instead of "loving shepherd"). This suggests our brains activate multiple sound options simultaneously, and sometimes the wrong one gets selected for production.
  • Morphological Slips: These errors involve mixing up word forms (e.g., "goed" instead of "went"). This highlights how morphology, the structure of words, influences speech production.
  • Anticipation and Perseveration: Sometimes, sounds from upcoming or previous words can intrude on the current word (e.g., "bring that cupba tea" where "cup" blends with "tea"). This shows the dynamic nature of speech production, where different parts of an utterance can influence each other.
  • Semantic Slips: These errors involve substituting words with similar meanings (e.g., "He kicked the bucket list" instead of "completed"). This suggests meaning plays a role in speech production, and sometimes the wrong word with a similar meaning gets selected. Studying these patterns helps us understand how language is produced in the brain. It reveals that speech production involves multiple levels of processing, from sounds to grammatical rules and meaning, and sometimes these levels can interact in unexpected ways leading to errors.

By analyzing speech errors, researchers can:

  • Gain insights into the architecture of the language processing system in the brain.
  • Identify potential language disorders by analyzing the types of errors a person makes.
  • Develop better models of speech production for speech recognition and synthesis technologies. Speech errors, although unintentional, offer valuable clues into the fascinating world of how we produce and understand language.