















Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An introduction to knee impairments, their causes, and assessment strategies. It also outlines corrective exercises for addressing knee impairments, including a systematic assessment process and exercises for knee valgus and varus. The document emphasizes the importance of neuromusculoskeletal control and dynamic knee control in reducing the risk of knee injuries.
What you will learn
Typology: Study notes
1 / 23
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
OBJECTIVES Upon completion of this chapter, you will be able to:
INTRODUCTION
REVIEW OF KNEE FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY
Bones and Joints
C
B
D A
Figure 13.1 Bones of the knee. (A) Tibia. (B) Femur. (C) Patella. (D) Fibula.
C
B
A
Figure 13.2 Proximal bones affecting the knee. (A) Femur. (B) Pelvis. (C) Sacrum.
A B
Figure 13.3 Distal bones affecting the knee. (A) Distal fibula. (B) Distal tibia.
Muscles
Table 13.1 KEY MUSCLES ASSOCIATED WITH THE KNEE
Patellofemoral Syndrome
Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury
Figure 13.6 Patellofemoral syndrome.
Figure 13.7A Anterior force. Figure 13.7B Lateral force. Figure 13.7C Rotational force.
Continued on page 272
ASSESSMENT AND CORRECTIVE EXERCISE STRATEGIES FOR KNEE
IMPAIRMENTS
The first step in developing a corrective exercise strategy for knee impairments is an inte- grated assessment process. On the basis of the information obtained from these assess- ments collectively, the neuromusculoskeletal control deficits can be identified for targeted treatments. A summary of the assessment process for knee impairments and common findings indicating potential dysfunction are listed below.
Static Posture Pronation distortion syndrome (tibial and femoral adduction and internal rotation)
Overhead Squat Knees move inward (adduct and internally rotate) Knees move outward (abduct and externally rotate) Single-leg Squat Knee moves inward (adduct and internally rotate)
Tuck Jump Assessment
Knee and thigh deficits (i.e., excessive knee valgus on landing) Foot placement deficits and poor landing technique
Goniometric Measurement
Decreased dorsiflexion (less than 15°) Decreased knee extension in 90/90 position (hamstring complex–biceps femoris) Decreased hip extension (TFL) Decreased hip internal rotation (biceps femoris, piriformis, and/or adductor magnus)
Manual Muscle Testing
One or more of the following muscles tested “weak”: Anterior/posterior tibialis, gluteus medius and/or maximus, medial hamstring complex, adductors (knees move outward during overhead squat)
( Text continues on page 288 )
Continued on page 274
The single-leg squat is also an important transitional assessment to perform to assess potential injury risks at the knee joint. Having to squat on one leg may show dysfunction not evident when squatting on two feet. Like the overhead squat, the key compensation to look for when performing the single-leg squat is whether the knee moves inward.
The tuck jump exercise may be useful to the health and fitness professional for the identifi- cation of lower-extremity technical flaws during a plyometric activity (19,21). The tuck jump requires a high level of effort from the individual, which may allow a health and fitness pro- fessional to readily identify potential deficits, especially during the first few repetitions when the individual places most of his or her cognitive efforts solely on the performance of this difficult jump (19,21). In addition, the tuck jump exercise may be used to assess improve- ment in lower-extremity biomechanics as the individual progresses through training (19,21).
Start Movement Finish
The below figure provides the “health and fitness professional friendly” landing as- sessment tool that the health and fitness professional may use to monitor an individual’s technical performance of the tuck jump before, during, and after training. As reviewed in chapter six, the individual is instructed to perform repeated tuck jumps for 10 seconds, while the health and fitness professional visually grades the outlined criteria (19). To im- prove the ease of the assessment, a standard two-dimensional camera in the frontal and sagittal planes may be used to assist the health and fitness professional. The individual’s technique should be subjectively graded as either having an apparent deficit (checked) or not. Indicators of flawed techniques should be noted for each individual and should be the focus of feedback during subsequent training sessions (19). The individual’s baseline performance can be compared with repeated assessments performed at the midpoint and conclusion of training protocols to objectively track improvement with jumping and land- ing technique. Empiric laboratory evidence suggests that individuals who do not improve their scores, or who demonstrate six or more flawed techniques, should be targeted for further technique training (19).
Tuck Jump Assessment Pre Knee and Thigh Motion 1 Lower extremity valgus at landing 2 Thighs do not reach parallel (peak of jump) 3 Thighs do not equal side-to-side (during flight)
Foot Position During Landing 4 Foot placement not shoulder width apart 5 Foot placement not parallel (front to back) 6 Foot contact timing not equal Excessive landing contact noise
Plyometric Technique Pause between jumps Technique declines prior to 10 seconds Does not land in same footprint (excessive in-flight motion)
Mid Post Comments
Total _____ Total _____ Total _____
7
8 9 10
One specific area that the health and fitness professional should focus on when train- ing to prevent ACL injury risk is the correction of lower-extremity valgus at landing and improvement of side-to-side differences in lower-extremity movements, which are both target deficits to be assessed with the tuck jump assessment tool (12,19). The tuck jump assessment tool can be used to improve these high-risk techniques during an exercise that requires a high effort level from the individual (19). If individuals can improve their neuromusculoskeletal control and biomechanics during this difficult jump and landing sequence, they may gain dynamic neuromusculoskeletal control of the lower extremity and create a learned skill that can be transferred to competitive play (if performing with an athlete) and ultimately reduces their injury risk (12,19).
Before teaching the dynamic movement exercises, individuals should be shown the proper athletic position. The athletic position is a functionally stable position with the knees comfortably flexed, shoulders back, eyes up, feet approximately shoulder-width apart, and the body mass balanced over the balls of the feet. The knees should be over the balls of the feet, and the chest should be over the knees (13,21). This is the individual’s ready position and should be the starting and fi nishing position for most of the training exercises.
Wall jumps are an example of an integrated dynamic movement exercise that could be used to target ligament dominance deficits. This low-to-moderate intensity jump move- ment allows the health and fitness professional to begin analysis of the athlete’s degree of valgus or varus motion in the knee (21). During wall jumps, the individual does not go through deep knee flexion angles, with most of the vertical movement provided by active ankle plantar flexion (21). The relatively straight knee makes even slight amounts of medial knee motion easy to identify visually. When medial knee motion is observed, the health and fitness professional should begin to give verbal feedback cues to the individual during this low-to-moderate intensity exercise (21). This feedback allows the athlete to cognitively process the proper knee motion required to perform the exercise. Neuromusculoskeletal control of medial knee motion is critical when landing with knee angles close to full exten- sion, as this is a commonly reported mechanism of injury (22).
Continued on page 278
Start Movement Finish
Another useful exercise to target the ligament-dominant individual is the tuck jump (as shown earlier in the chapter). Although used as an assessment, the tuck jump can also be used as an exercise that is on the opposite end of the intensity spectrum from the wall jump and requires a high level of effort from the individual. During the tuck jump exercise, the health and fitness professional can quickly identify an individual who may demonstrate abnormal levels of frontal plane knee displacement during jumping and landing because the individual usually devotes minimal attention to technique on the first few repetitions (21). As mentioned earlier, tuck jumps can also be used to assess improvements in lower- extremity biomechanics (19). The long jump and hold exercise allows the health and fi tness professional to as- sess the individual’s knee motion while he or she progresses through movements in the sagittal plane (21). The achievement of dynamic knee control during tasks performed in all planes of movement is critical to address defi cits that may transfer into competitive sports participation or everyday activities. During competition, athletes may display “ac- tive valgus,” a position of hip adduction and knee abduction that is the result of muscular contraction rather than ground reaction forces (21). The long jump is a moderate-intensity integrated dynamic movement exercise that can provide another opportunity for the health and fitness professional to assess active valgus and provide feedback on more desir- able techniques, which can assist the individual’s cognitive recognition during each jump to perfect technique. When performing the long jump exercise, individuals may dem- onstrate active valgus when taking off from a jump rather than landing. This movement deficit should be identified and corrected during training. In addition, individuals should
Continued on page 280
continue to maintain deep knee flexion when landing and control unwanted frontal plane motion at the knee (21). Proper progression into the single-leg hop and hold is critical to ensure individual safety during training (21). This point is salient for the health and fitness professional, as ACL injury prevention tech- niques should not introduce inappropriate risk of injury during training. The end stages of training targeted to- ward ligament-dominance deficits is achieved through the use of unanticipated cutting move- ments. Before teaching unanticipated cutting, individuals should first be able to attain proper athletic position proficiently (21). This ready po- sition is the goal position to achieve before ini- tiating a directional cut. Adding the directional cues to the unanticipated part of training can be as simple as pointing or as sports-specific as using partner mimic or ball retrieval drills (21).
Start Movement Finish
Single-faceted sagittal plane training and conditioning protocols that do not incorporate cutting maneuvers will not provide similar levels of external varus or valgus or rotational loads that are seen during sport-specific cutting maneuvers (21,25). Train- ing programs that incorporate safe levels of varus or valgus stress may induce more muscle-dominant neuromusculoskeletal adaptations (26). Such adaptations may pre- pare the individual for the multidirectional movement demands that occur during sport competition, which can improve performance and reduce risk of lower-extremity injury (12,13,21,23,27,28). Research has shown that female athletes perform cutting techniques with decreased knee flexion and increased valgus angles (15,21,29). Knee valgus loads can double when performing unanticipated cutting maneuvers similar to those used in sport (21,30). Thus the end point of training designed to reduce ACL loading via valgus torques can be gained through training the athlete to use movement techniques that produce low frontal plane knee loads (26). Recent evidence demonstrates that training which
Start Finish
incorporates unanticipated movements can reduce knee joint loads and lower-extremity injury risk (12,23,31). Additionally, training individuals to preactivate their musculature before ground contact may facilitate kinematic adjustments, reducing the potential for increased knee loads (21,30,32,33). Training the individual to use safe cutting techniques in unanticipated sport situations or everyday activities may also help impart technique adap- tations that will integrate into the athlete’s competitive movements during sport competi- tion or during activities of daily living. If naturally ligament-dominant individuals achieve muscular (sagittal) -dominant movement strategies, their future risk of ACL and other knee injuries will likely be reduced (13,21,28). It is important to note that not all individuals will have the physical capabilities to per- form many of the aforementioned jump task progressions. In this situation, a basic func- tional movement progression that incorporates total body integration in multiple planes can be used as integrated dynamic movements. This progression could begin with ball squats, then to step-ups, then to lunges, then to single-leg squats (from more stable/less dynamic to more unstable/more dynamic). For each exercise, it will be important to cue the individual to keep the knee(s) in line with the toes and to not allow the knee to move inside or outside of the foot to ensure proper arthrokinematics and neuromuscular control.
Squatting Step-up Lunging Single-leg Squatting
The following table provides a sample programming strategy using the Corrective Exercise Continuum for knee impairments. The photos illustrate the exercises that can be done for each component of the continuum to help address the issue of knee impairments (knees move inward and knees move outward). Which exercises are used will be depen- dent on the findings of the assessments and the individual’s physical capabilities (integra- tion exercises).
TFL/IT-band Biceps femoris
Key lengthening exercises via static and/or neuromuscular stretches would include the gastrocnemius/soleus, adductors, TFL, and biceps femoris (short head).
Gastrocnemius/soleus Adductors TFL
Biceps femoris (short head)
Step 2: Lengthen
Continued on page 284
Gastrocnemius/soleus Adductors Biceps femoris
Key activation exercises via isolated strengthening exercises and/or positional isometrics include the anterior tibialis, posterior tibialis, gluteus medius, and gluteus maximus.
Anterior tibialis Posterior tibialis Gluteus medius Gluteus maximus
Step 3: Activate
Continued on page 286
Key regions to inhibit via foam rolling include the gastrocnemius/soleus, piriformis, and biceps femoris (long head).
Biceps femoris
Gastrocnemius/soleus Piriformis
Key lengthening exercises via static and/or neuromuscular stretches would include the gastrocnemius/soleus, piriformis, and biceps femoris (long head).
Step 1: Inhibit
Step 2: Lengthen
Biceps femoris (long head)
Piriformis
Gastrocnemius/soleus
Gastrocnemius/soleus Piriformis Biceps femoris
Key activation exercises via isolated strengthening exercises and/or positional isometrics include the adductors, medial hamstring complex, and gluteus maximus.
Step 3: Activate