Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Densities - Seismology - Lecture Slides, Slides of Geology

Following are the Fundamentals of these Lecture Slides : Densities, Common Rocks, Unweathered Rocks, Weathered, Surface, Deep Rocks, Vadose Zone, Unfractured Rocks, Fractured, Unconsolidated

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 07/19/2013

saen.chumi
saen.chumi 🇮🇳

4.6

(13)

96 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Densities of Common Rocks
Which has higher / lower density?
Surface / deep rocks
Weathered / unweathered rocks
Rocks in the phreatic / vadose zone
Fractured / unfractured rocks
Type Rock Density
Unconsolidated Sand 1400-1650 kg/m3
Sedimentary Salt 2100-2600
Limestone 2000-2700
Shale 2000-2700
Igneous Granite 2500-2800
Basalt 2700-3000
Metamorphic Quartzite 2600-2700
Gneiss 2600-3000
Ore Galena 7400-7600
Pyrite 4900-5200
Magnetite 4900-5300
Which rock types make good
targets for gravity surveying?
Which don’t
Why
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Densities - Seismology - Lecture Slides and more Slides Geology in PDF only on Docsity!

Densities of Common Rocks

  • Which has higher / lower density?
    • Surface / deep rocks
    • Weathered / unweathered rocks
    • Rocks in the phreatic / vadose zone
    • Fractured / unfractured rocks

Type Rock Density

Unconsolidated Sand 1400-1650 kg/m^3

Sedimentary Salt 2100-

Limestone 2000-

Shale 2000-

Igneous Granite 2500-

Basalt 2700-

Metamorphic Quartzite 2600-

Gneiss 2600-

Ore Galena 7400-

Pyrite 4900-

Magnetite 4900-

  • Which rock types make good targets for gravity surveying? - Which don’t - Why

Size of Gravity Anomalies

  • To better understand the size of a typical gravity anomaly, lets

use a simple example…

  • Buried sphere (decent approximation of a rising pluton or diapir)
    • 0.3 Mg/m^3 higher density than surrounding rocks
      • Only the difference relative to the surrounding rocks matters
    • Radius = 50 m
    • Depth to center of sphere 100 m

Gravity Units

  • The last example shows that gravity anomalies produce very

small perturbations relative to g (i.e. 9.81 m/s

2

  • So measuring gravity anomalies in m/s 2 is not convenient
  • Instead we adopt a new unit: Gal (named in honor of Galileo)
  • 1 Gal = 0.01 m/s^2 = 0.01 m/s^2
  • But this is still too large, so we typically use milliGals (mGal) or gravity units (g.u.)
  • 1 mGal = 0.01 Gal = 10 g.u. = 1x10 -5^ m/s^2 ~ 10 -6^ g (approximation assuming g=10 m/s 2 )
  • So our buried sphere produced an anomaly of:
  • 1.048x10 -6^ m/s^2 = ~ 0.1 mGal

Spatial Variation in Gravity Anomalies

  • The previous example only calculated the change in g directly above

the buried sphere.

  • What is the effect at locations not directly above the dense sphere?
    • The net pull is larger than g (must sum forces vectorially)
    • The net pull is not vertical, but this is hard to measure
      • Plum bobs are used to measure vertical and are assumed to hang vertically
    • The net vertical pull is greater than g.
      • We can measure this! This is how we measure gravity anomalies

This figure is exaggerated. Fb is tiny compared to FE

δg