



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An introduction to the underlying objectives of Descartes' Metaphysics.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
1. Find Certainty ● He refused to accept the authority of previous philosophers and the data of the senses in the search for a foundation for philosophy. ● He trusted only that which is clearly and distinctly seen to be beyond any doubt. ● He removed the layers of beliefs and opinions that clouded his view of the truth. Until only the simple fact of doubting itself and the inescapable inference that something exists is doubting. ○ He arrived at the cogito by doubting everything. “From my childhood, I have been familiar with letters; and as I was given to believe that by their help a clear and certain knowledge of all that is useful in life might be acquired, I was ardently desirous of instruction. But as soon as I had finished the entire course of study, at the close of which it is customary to be admitted into the order of the learned, I completely changed my opinion. For I found myself involved in so many doubts and errors, that I was convinced I had advanced no farther in all my attempts at learning, than the discovery at every turn of my own ignorance.” Discourse on Method ● When he finished the course, he found himself doubting all the things he had learned; and therefore, he has to start all over again – discard everything that he has learned. 2. Fulfill the dream for a universal science ● A universal science is a science that will apply both to the natural sciences, physical sciences, theology, and religion. ● This required him to find a unified set of principles from which he could deduce all the answers to scientific questions. ● His general physics is a rational justification for a universal, mathematical / quantitative understanding of nature. ○ Descartes was also a mathematician and physicist. ● His concern with scepticism in all its forms was directed ast religious and epistemological scepticism in general. ○ There must be a general doubt about the foundation of our knowledge. ■ Not doubt the existence of something in front of us (e.g. not doubt the book we are holding) ○ Foundation of our knowledge is our senses ● His philosophical method was also intended to be a method for science. ● His first discussion of scientific method is in an unfinished work: Rules for the Direction of the Mind. ● The first 12 of the planned 36 rules deal with the general aspects of his proposed methodology, and are considered early versions of principles that were developed in his later writings.
3. Reconcile the mechanistic view of the world as expounded in the physical science with human freedom and his religious perspective. ● The picture of the world as a giant, deterministic physical machine threatened the uniqueness and freedom of the soul and left little room for God. ○ Deus ex machina - the world is governed by deterministic physical laws expounded by the physical sciences and reconcile this with human freedom and human perspective. ○ If everything is determined by the physical laws, how can God still be provident? There is a need for a method to attain the objective. METHOD: To find certainty and a unified set of principles for the sciences, he turned to mathematics: certainty and self-evidence of its reasoning. ● The method of mathematics consists of two mental operations: ○ Intuition - recognition of self-evident truths ■ Very prominent in his concept of innate ideas ■ Innate ideas allow us to immediately recognize self-evident truths ■ Ex. Principle of Contradiction (p is p) ○ Deduction - necessary inference from other propositions that are known with certainty ■ By way of inference from the substitute certainty of this self-evident truth, through deduction, we can proceed to discover new knowledge. “The long chains of simple and easy reasoning by means of which geometers are accustomed to reach the conclusions of their most difficult demonstrations had led me to imagine that all things are mutually connected in the same way, and that there is nothing so far removed from us as to be beyond our reach, or so hidden that we cannot discover it, provided only we abstain from accepting the false for the true, and always preserve in our thoughts the order necessary for the deduction of one truth from another. And I had little difficulty in determining the objects with which it was necessary to commence, for I was already persuaded that it must be with the simplest and easiest to know, and,... the mathematics alone have been able to find any demonstrations, that is, any certain and evident reasons,... I resolved to commence, therefore, with the examination of the simplest objects, not anticipating, however, from this any other advantage than that to be found in accustoming my mind to love and nourishment of truth, and to a distaste for all such reasonings as were unsound.” ● We can always recognize self-evident truths, and if we follow the method of deduction, then we can deduce one truth from another truth. RULES ON METHODS
● Starting with his own ideas, Descartes noticed his ideas of physical objects, the question now is if there are external objects corresponding to these ideas, what caused these ideas? ● One reason could be that God caused these ideas of the physical objects and the world within me. ○ Is it the world or me causing these ideas? ● But if there are no corresponding physical / external objects then God is just deceiving me, but this is impossible. ○ As God caused these ideas within me, and in order to not deceive me as there is no objective reality, there must be a physical and external object that represents these ideas. ○ Descartes’ proof that there is a cosmos / physical reality. ● Hence there is an external / physical world that more or less conforms to the way I experience it. ○ Different from Aristotle and St. Thomas’ notion that we form an image of the physical world – the ideas that correspond to the physical world. ○ For Descartes: God is the cause of our ideas, and what we see of the world corresponds to the ideas. What the cogito proved: ● Descartes’ philosophical demonstration to prove what he knew all along
of parts and cannot be divided. ■ As it is a spiritual substance, it is not governed by the mechanical laws of the physical reality. ○ Physical Substance - res extensa ■ The body is not conscious and is moved by mechanical forces acting on it. The body is extended and occupies space and can be divided into more elementary components or particles. ■ Governed by deterministic physical laws ● The interaction of the mind and body is in the human person. ○ Descartes described the relation of the mind and body as one of interaction. ○ They seem to influence each other but in reality, they do not because they are separate entities, such a position is known as psychophysical dualism. ○ Pineal gland as the point of interaction between the mind and the body.