




Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A high-level summary of the book 'Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most' by Stone, Patton and Heen. It discusses the ingredients of difficult conversations, including differing perceptions, assumptions about intent, feelings, and blame. It also provides tools for effectively engaging in a difficult conversation, such as using 'I' messages and focusing on contribution instead of blame. The document concludes with tips for preparing for a difficult conversation.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 8
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Office of Human Resources The Ohio State University 1590 N. High St. Suite 300 Columbus, OH 43201-
Ingredients of Difficult Conversations
Differing Perceptions
In most difficult conversations, there are different perceptions of the same reality. I think I’m right and the person with whom I disagree thinks she’s right. I don’t see myself as the problem – I know I make sense. What’s often hard to see is that what the other person is saying also makes sense.
We have different perceptions because:
We have different information about the same event/decision/issue. We have different interpretations of the same event/decision/issue. Our interpretations come from different life experiences that have shaped the lens through which we see people, workplace issues, etc.
Assumptions about Intent
Oftentimes when we are in a difficult situation, we assume we know the intentions of the other person. Intentions exist only in people’s hearts and minds. Unless someone explicitly states his/her intention, we cannot know his/her intention.
It is common during a difficult situation to make an attribution about another person’s intentions based on the impact of their actions on us. We feel hurt; therefore we believe they intended to hurt us. We feel slighted; therefore we believe they intended to slight us. Our thinking is so automatic that we aren’t even aware that our conclusion is only an assumption.
Feelings
There are situations when we get so passionately involved that our emotions affect our ability to think, problem solve and appropriately communicate. At the very least, when we are very upset, and have not successfully communicated our feelings, it is not possible to listen.
In many conflict situations, feelings are the heart of the matter. They are the primary issues even though they may be masked by a presenting symptom. Unexpressed feelings can color a tough situation. They may take the form of sarcasm, passive aggression, impatience, etc.
Blame
It is typical for people who are in conflict to focus on who is to blame for the problem. The questions people ask themselves or each other are: Who is the bad person here? Who made the mistake? Who should apologize? Who gets to be stubborn and indignant?
Focusing on blame is ineffective because it inhibits our ability to learn what really caused the problem and to do anything of significance to correct it. Blame is about making judgments while effective conflict management is about learning from mistakes, understanding different perceptions of the same reality, and adjusting one’s behavior for better results in the future.
Tools for Effectively Engaging in a Difficult Conversation Continued
#3 Tool: Adopt the “Yes, And…” Stance
The essence of the "yes, and…” concept is the validation that both your view of the situation, and that of another person, have value and you do not have to choose which one is right. You can embrace both and then work at understanding the other person's point of view.
After listening to another person’s story or perception, don’t feel like you have to give up your own. The “yes, and…” stance allows you to recognize that the way you each see things matters, and the way you each feel matters. The “yes, and…” stance is based on the assumption that the world is a complex place. You can feel hurt, angry and wronged and they can feel equally hurt, angry and wronged. You can be certain you said what you said and they can be just as certain they heard what they heard you say.
Example : “I now understand that you walked away feeling isolated and lonely. I also walked away from the meeting feeling unheard and dismissed.”
The critical component is that you allow yourself to express your view and listen to the other person's view as well. Once you have reached this stage, you can say: "Now that we really understand each other, what's a good way to resolve this problem?"
#4 Tool: Learn to Recognize your Stories to Separate Impact and Intent
We tell ourselves stories when we add meaning to another’s behavior without checking if our conclusions are right. Often these stories silently and repetitively play in our heads. To prevent yourself from leaping to assumptions about another’s intent, ask yourself three questions:
Once you have clearly answered these three questions, the next step is to make sure you recognize that your assumption about their intentions is just a guess. Your guess may be right and it may be wrong. It has definitely generated feelings for you, but your feelings may be based on incorrect conclusions.
In conversation, you can share what you observed the other do or say (actions), how that felt (the impact), and your assumption about intentions. It is important to label the assumption as just that
Example : “I felt lousy when you didn’t call me. I was sure you knew that it was a big deal for me and I would want to talk about it. Because you didn’t call, I assumed you didn’t care.
Tools for Effectively Engaging in a Difficult Conversation Continued
#5 Tool: Use “I” Messages
Statements that start with “you” sound accusatory and blaming. They typically evoke a defensive response in the person who hears it. Sentences that start with “I” are less inflammatory and they keep responsibility for what is expressed with the person doing the speaking.
Example: “You just keep rambling on and on repeating the same things.” Versus: “I am not understanding you. Help me to hear what I am missing.”
#6 Tool: Focus on Contribution, NOT Blame
Contribution asks, “How did we each contribute to this problem or conflict that we are experiencing?” The purpose of asking this question and determining contribution is to do something different in the future – let’s not repeat whatever we did or did not do that got us into this conflict/problem. Let’s learn about each other and how we work together to be more productive and healthier the next time.
Worksheet for Preparing to Engage in a Difficult Conversation
Step What will you say? What will you do?
Resources for Difficult Conversations
Patterson, K., Grenny, J., McMillan, R., and Switzler, A. (2002). Crucial conversations: tools for talking when stakes are high. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 0-07-140194-
Scott, Susan. (2002). Fierce conversations – achieving success at work and in life, one conversation at a time. New York: Berkley Publishing. ISBN: 0-425-19337-
Stone, D., Patton, B., Heen, S. (1999). Difficult conversations: how to discuss what matters most. New York: Penguin. ISBN: 0 14 02.8852X