










Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Growth over the Very Long Run – p. 1 ... Double exponential growth — growth rates grow ... A crucial condition for getting the “hockey stick” is.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 18
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Chad Jones
Stanford GSB
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
5
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10
YEAR
INDEX (1.0 IN INITIAL YEAR)
Growth over the Very Long Run – p. 2
Malthusian Land:
◦
Fixed supply of land
◦
Decreasing returns to scale holding technology fixed.
Demographic transition
◦
Fertility at first rises with income
◦
But eventually declines
Some kind of growth process
◦
Lee / Kremer / Jones: Ideas
◦
Lucas / Galor: Human capital
◦
Hansen-Prescott: Solow exogenous tech change
Let
a
log
and
log
Double exponential growth — growth rates growexponentially!
People produce ideas and ideas produce people, with IRS
Builds on Lee (1988) and provides empirical support
Suppose
σ
α
β
1
−
α
−
β
and
λ
φ
A crucial condition for getting the “hockey stick” is
Why?
Starting with Galor and Weil (2000). See also Lucas (1998).
Nutshell version:
◦
Lee-Kremer like mechanism initially lifts incomes
◦
Induces human capital accumulation, driving growth
◦
Demographic transition via quality-quantity tradeoff
Extensive follow up research
◦
Natural selection
◦
Role of geography and timing of the neolithic revolution Guns, Germs, and Steel
◦
Biocultural origins of human capital formation
Two production technologies available at all times
◦
Malthus
m
m
φ
m
μ
m
1
−
φ
−
μ
◦
Solow
s
s
θ
s
1
−
θ
s
◦
Exogenous growth in both
m
and
s
◦
Mechanical demographic transition
Can use either technology to make homogenenous output:
Key assumption:
s
initially low, but grows faster than
m
Growth over the Very Long Run – p. 14
How to endogenize fertility?
◦
Cordoba and Ripoll, “The Elasticity of IntergenerationalSubstitution, Parental Altruism, and Fertility Choice”2014 working paper.
◦
Quality-quantity tradeoff surely important here.
Why U.K. instead of China?
Role of institutions