Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

EEG lab Human Physiology, Lab Reports of Biology

Lab for Human Physiology, BIO 224 at Franciscan University of Steubenville. This lab includes photos of the EEG tracing in LabScribe along with answering some basic questions.

Typology: Lab Reports

2019/2020

Uploaded on 11/20/2020

zayrael
zayrael 🇺🇸

1 document

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Olivia Barry
Monday Human Physiology Lab
Fall 2020
LAB 1: EMG Grip Strength
Purpose: The purpose of this experiment was to determine the grip strengths and maximum forces of
the dominant and non-dominant forearms during both relative grip strengths tests and fatigue tests.
Hypothesis: If one forearm is dominant, then it will have a higher maximum force than the non-
dominant forearm. If one forearm is dominant, then it will fatigue slower than the non-dominant
forearm.
Experimental Design: The subject participated in five exercises designed for observing grip strength and
muscle fatigue in both forearms. An ITXA, iWire-B3G EMG, and electrode wires were used to record the
EMG and Muscle Force measurements. Exercise 1 measured the relative grip strengths of the dominant
hand. Exercise 2 measured how long it took for the dominant forearm to fatigue, by looking at the
maximum force and the half maximum force. Exercise 3 measured the relative grip strengths of the non-
dominant hand. Exercise 4 measured how long it took for the non-dominant forearm to fatigue, by
looking at the maximum force and the half maximum force. Exercise 5 measured how long it took for
the dominant forearm to fatigue, by looking at the maximum force and the half maximum force, after
icing the dominant forearm for 10 minutes.
Results:
Exercise 1
Figure 1: Graphs of EMG and Muscle Force during relative grip strengths of dominant hand.
Relative Grip Strength Absolute Int. of EMG Activity Absolute Int. under Force Curve
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download EEG lab Human Physiology and more Lab Reports Biology in PDF only on Docsity!

Monday Human Physiology Lab Fall 2020 LAB 1: EMG Grip Strength Purpose: The purpose of this experiment was to determine the grip strengths and maximum forces of the dominant and non-dominant forearms during both relative grip strengths tests and fatigue tests. Hypothesis: If one forearm is dominant, then it will have a higher maximum force than the non- dominant forearm. If one forearm is dominant, then it will fatigue slower than the non-dominant forearm. Experimental Design: The subject participated in five exercises designed for observing grip strength and muscle fatigue in both forearms. An ITXA, iWire-B3G EMG, and electrode wires were used to record the EMG and Muscle Force measurements. Exercise 1 measured the relative grip strengths of the dominant hand. Exercise 2 measured how long it took for the dominant forearm to fatigue, by looking at the maximum force and the half maximum force. Exercise 3 measured the relative grip strengths of the non- dominant hand. Exercise 4 measured how long it took for the non-dominant forearm to fatigue, by looking at the maximum force and the half maximum force. Exercise 5 measured how long it took for the dominant forearm to fatigue, by looking at the maximum force and the half maximum force, after icing the dominant forearm for 10 minutes. Results: Exercise 1 Figure 1: Graphs of EMG and Muscle Force during relative grip strengths of dominant hand. Relative Grip Strength Absolute Int. of EMG Activity Absolute Int. under Force Curve

Monday Human Physiology Lab Fall 2020 (kg) (PSI) Lowest 1335.7 33. Higher 1 1407.7 38. Higher 2 1415.3 44. Higher 3 1524.5 50. Highest 1603.6 58. Table 1: Data from Figure 1. Graph for Exercise 1 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Absolute Integrals of EMG Activity and Absolute Integrals Under Force Curves Dominant

Absolute Integrals of EMG Activity (kg) AbsoluteInt. Under ForceCurves (PSI) Exercise 2

Monday Human Physiology Lab Fall 2020 1580 1590 1600 1610 1620 1630 1640 1650 1660 1670 1680 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Absolute Integrals of EMG Activity and Absolute Integrals Under Force Curves Non-Dominant

Absolute Integrals of EMG Activity (kg) AbsoluteInt. Under ForceCurves (PSI) Exercise 4 Figure 4: Graphs of EMG and Muscle Force during non-dominant hand fatigue exercise. Max: 13. Half-Max: 6. Time to Fatigue: 25. Exercise 5

Monday Human Physiology Lab Fall 2020 Figure 5: Graphs of EMG and Muscle Force during dominant hand fatigue exercise, after 10 minutes of icing. Max: 13. Half-Max: 6. Time to Fatigue: 26.707 seconds Questions

  1. Is there a linear relationship between the absolute integral for EMG and the absolute integral for Muscle Force? Yes, there is somewhat of a linear relationship between the absolute integral under EMG signals and the absolute integral under the muscle contraction.
  2. Does the amplitude of the EMG signal and the force of contraction, as measured by the absolute integrals, increase because a finite number of muscle fibers are firing more often, or because more fibers are recruited to fire as the intensity of signal in the motor neurons increases, or a combination of these two? The amplitude of the EMG signal and the force of contraction increase as a cause of both more muscle fibers firing and the muscle fibers firing more often.
  3. Is there a difference in the maximum forces generated by the dominant and nondominant forearms? (Calculate a percent difference) Yes, the dominant forearm is slightly stronger than the non-dominant forearm.