Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution: Nitration, Sulfonation, Halogenation, and Alkylation, Lecture notes of Organic Chemistry

An in-depth analysis of electrophilic aromatic substitution, focusing on nitration, sulfonation, halogenation, and Friedel-Crafts alkylation and acylation. It explains the mechanisms, limitations, and effects of substituents on the reactivity of aromatic rings.

What you will learn

  • What is the mechanism of nitration in electrophilic aromatic substitution?
  • What are the limitations of Friedel-Crafts alkylation?
  • How does the presence of substituents on an aromatic ring affect its reactivity?
  • How does sulfonation of an aromatic ring provide a route to a phenol?
  • What is the difference between Friedel-Crafts alkylation and acylation?

Typology: Lecture notes

2020/2021

Uploaded on 05/24/2021

anasooya
anasooya ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

4

(12)

244 documents

1 / 16

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
1
Nucleophile-
Lewis base.
Shorthand:
Ar-H
E++
HE
+H+
Electrophile-
Lewis acid:
may be
or neutral.
Product: neutral if
electrophile is ;
if electrophile
is neutral.
Shorthand: Ar-E
H2SO4
Ar-H + HNO3 Ar-NO2 + H2O
Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution
Electrophilic substitution is the typical reaction type for
aromatic rings.
Generalized electrophilic aromatic substitution:
1. Nitration โ€”
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Partial preview of the text

Download Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution: Nitration, Sulfonation, Halogenation, and Alkylation and more Lecture notes Organic Chemistry in PDF only on Docsity!

Nucleophile- Lewis base. Shorthand: Ar-H

E+^ +

H (^) E

  • H+

Electrophile- Lewis acid: may be or neutral.

Product: neutral if electrophile is ; if electrophile is neutral. Shorthand: Ar-E

H 2 SO 4

Ar-H + HNO 3 Ar-NO 2 + H 2 O

Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution

Electrophilic substitution is the typical reaction type for aromatic rings.

Generalized electrophilic aromatic substitution:

  1. Nitration โ€”
  • H 2 SO 4

NO 2

  • fast

(3) HSO 3 -^ H^ NO^2

Addition of a basic group, eg HSO 4 - , to the ฯƒ complex would result in formation of a non-aromatic compound, whereas expulsion of H+^ results in an aromatic product.

This intermediate carbocation is sometimes called a ฯƒ complex.

ฯƒ bond H NO 2 H NO 2 H NO 2

(2) O=N=O + slow

a nitronium ion, cf. NO 2 +^ BF 4 -

(1) HONO 2 + 2 H 2 SO 4 H^3 O^ + 2^ HSO^4 + NO^2

Mechanism

Since the nitro group can often be reduced to the amine group (tin or iron and HCl are frequently used to effect this reduction), ArNO 2 > Ar-NH 2 , nitration is often used to ultimately make an aryl amine.

Note the following โ€”

+ Sulfonic acids ( eg , ArSO 3 H), derivatives of sulfuric

acid, are strong acids and are highly ionized in water.

+ Each step in the sulfonation mechanism is an

equilibrium; therefore, the entire reaction is an equilibrium. Thus, Ar-H can be sulfonated using fuming sulfuric acid, H 2 SO 4 CSO 3 , and Ar-SO 3 H can be desulfonated (to Ar-H) by boiling it in a dilute solution of sulfuric acid.

+ Sulfonation of an aromatic ring can provide a route to

a phenol , Ar-OH. If a sulfonic acid is fused with solid KOH, the -SO 3 H group is replaced by -OH. [Owing to the vigorous reaction conditions, there are limitations with regard to which substituents may be present on the ring.]

+ Sulfonation of an aromatic ring provides a highly

polar site capable of hydrogen bonding; this gives rise to water solubility. Dyes are sometimes made water soluble in this way.

+ Some synthetic detergents have the structure

, where R is a long-chain alkyl group.

R SO 3 -^ Na+

The ionic "head" is hydrophilic and the long "tail" is hydrophobic. This combination enables this material to disperse oily material in water.

Ar-H + X 2 Fe Ar-X + HX

Cl H

(1) Cl 2 + FeCl 3 FeCl 4 -^ Cl+ complex

(2) (^) FeCl 4 -^ Cl+ +^ slow

(3) (^) + FeCl 4 -

Cl

  • HCl + FeCl 3

2 Fe + 3 Cl 2 2 FeCl 3

catalyst

electrophile

Cl H

FeCl 4 -

  1. Halogenation โ€”

Mechanism

R+

R H

(1) RCl + AlCl 3 AlCl 4 -^ R+ sometimes a complex, sometimes not

(2) +^ slow

(3) (^) + AlCl 4 -

R

  • HCl + AlCl 3

catalyst

electrophile

R H

AlCl 4 -

Mechanism

Since a carbocation can be the electrophile in this mechanism, a variety of carbocation precursors could be used: alkenes, for example. Since aryl and vinyl carbocations are unstable, Ar-X and vinyl-X cannot be used as precursors for these species.

Limitations on Friedel-Crafts Alkylation โ€”

+ The alkyl group may rearrange.

+ Any group which deactivates an aromatic ring more

than the halogens ( vide infra ) cannot be present on the ring prior to F-C alkylation, nor can -NH 2 , -NHR, or -NR 2.

+ Alkyl groups^ activate^ aromatic rings toward

electrophilic substitution; therefore, polyalkylation is a problem.

Limitations โ€”

+ Any group which deactivates an aromatic ring more

than the halogens ( vide infra ) cannot be present on the ring prior to F-C acylation, nor can -NH 2 , -NHR, or -NR 2. However, the acylium ion does not rearrange and polyacylation is not a problem because the acyl group deactivates the ring toward further electrophilic substitution.

Major Minor

H 2 SO 4

HNO 3

CH 3

meta

para

ortho (^) CH 3

NO 2

NO 2

CH 3 CH 3

NO 2

Effect of Substituents Already on the Ring

Reactivity: Activating or Deactivating โ€”

If we allow toluene and benzene to react with mixtures of nitric and sulfuric acids under the same conditions and the toluene reacts 25 times faster than the benzene, we say it is 25 times more reactive. We would also say that the methyl group activates the aromatic ring toward nitration. Since the other electrophilic aromatic substitutions have mechanisms similar to nitration, we might expect the methyl group to activate the aromatic ring toward these reactions; usually, it does.

If we nitrate toluene, we find that the major products are p -nitrotoluene and o -nitrotoluene; only a small amount of m -nitrotoluene is formed. We say the methyl group is an ortho, para director for electrophilic substitutions.

H 2 SO 4

HNO 3

H 2 SO 4

HNO 3

Boxed resonance structures make an especially large contribution if X is electron releasing ; they make an especially small contribution if X is electron withdrawing.

Note: ortho and para attack form carbocations with one boxed structure; the carbocation resulting from meta attack has no boxed structures.

Meta Attack

Para Attack

X

NO 2

H

X

NO 2

H

H 2 SO 4

HNO 3

X

NO 2

X

NO 2 H

X

H

X

Ortho Attack

X

NO 2 H X

NO 2 H X

X

NO 2

H

NO 2

X

H

X

NO 2 H

OK. Electron withdrawing groups on the ring destabilize

the transition state leading to the ฯƒ-complex, and electron donating ones stabilize the transition state, so reaction occurs faster with electron donating groups. And the effect is greatest at the ortho and para positions so an electron withdrawing group is meta directing because it deactivates the o and p positions.

BUT, two questions.

1) Why are some groups which appear to be electron withdrawing, -NO 2 for example, deactivating and meta directing as expected, while others, -NH 2 for example, are activating and o, p directing?

2) Why are the halogens deactivating and o, p directing?

OK.

  1. Note that all the groups which would seem to be deactivating meta directors and turn out to be activating o, p directors, -OH and -NH 2 , for example, carry at least one pair of unshared electrons. These unshared electrons are delocalized into the ring as the ฯƒ-complex intermediate forms if attack is at the ortho or para position.

COOH

COOH

NH 2

NO 2

OH

O 2 N

HNO 3

H 2 SO 4

OH

O 2 N

NO 2

OH

O 2 N NO 2

CH 3

Cl

HNO 3 H 2 SO 4

CH 3

Cl NO 2

CH 3

Cl

NO 2

CH 3

Cl

O 2 N

32% 59% 9%

Position of Electrophilic Attack for Disubstituted Benzenes

  1. Where two groups reinforce each other, the outcome is obvious.

In cases of opposing effects prediction is more difficult and mixtures may result.

  1. Strongly activating groups usually win out over deactivating or weakly activating groups.

  2. The is usually little substitution between two groups which are meta to each other.