Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Enclosures - Noise Control - Lab Manual, Study notes of Noise Control

Some of topics included in this course are: Fundamentals of Acoustics, Levels and Decibels, Divergence and Directivity, Hearing, Human Response to Noise, Frequency Analysis, Sound Sources and Fields, Room Acoustics, Sound Power, Noise Barriers, Outdoor Sound Propagation, Helmholtz Resonator and Vibration Control. Key points of this lab manual are: Enclosures, Insertion Loss, Sound Propagation, Transmission of Sound, Prediction of Insertion Loss, Surface of the Chamber, Measurement of Insertion

Typology: Study notes

2012/2013

Uploaded on 10/02/2013

kali
kali 🇮🇳

4.5

(37)

109 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ME458 Lab 6 8/17/2000 page 1
ME 458 Noise Control
Laboratory #6
Enclosures
Objectives: Measure and calculate the insertion loss of a noise enclosure
Background: In this lab, you will have the opportunity to consolidate much of the
understanding that you have hopefully gained about sound propagation in rooms, the
absorption of sound in materials and the transmission of sound through panels and
openings. You are to verify the insertion loss relation derived in class for an enclosure.
The enclosure’s walls are made of assorted materials (plexiglas, chipboard, etc). The
interior is lined with acoustic foam of varying thickness.
Procedure:
Prediction of Insertion Loss
1) Carefully measure the dimensions of each surface of the chamber
2) Look up (from material tables) the absorption and transmission loss values for the
various materials for frequencies from 250 to 4000 Hz.
3) Compute the insertion loss for the enclosure in each octave band.
Surface Area α
αα
α τ
ττ
τ
Measurement of Insertion Loss and Sound Power
4) Measure the SPL of the ILG source, uncovered and covered by the enclosure. (in
octave bands from 250 to 4000 Hz)
5) Calculate the insertion loss (the difference in levels with and without the enclosure)
Measured Calculated
Insertion Loss (dB)
Reporting Requirements: Submit a brief, concise lab report. Comment on the
agreement between predicted and measured insertion loss. What are some possible
reasons for any observed discrepancies? What design changes could be made to
improve the effectiveness of the enclosure?

Partial preview of the text

Download Enclosures - Noise Control - Lab Manual and more Study notes Noise Control in PDF only on Docsity!

ME458 Lab 6 8/17/2000 page 1

ME 458 Noise Control

Laboratory

Enclosures

Objectives: Measure and calculate the insertion loss of a noise enclosure

Background: In this lab, you will have the opportunity to consolidate much of the understanding that you have hopefully gained about sound propagation in rooms, the absorption of sound in materials and the transmission of sound through panels and openings. You are to verify the insertion loss relation derived in class for an enclosure. The enclosure’s walls are made of assorted materials (plexiglas, chipboard, etc). The interior is lined with acoustic foam of varying thickness.

Procedure: Prediction of Insertion Loss

  1. Carefully measure the dimensions of each surface of the chamber
  2. Look up (from material tables) the absorption and transmission loss values for the various materials for frequencies from 250 to 4000 Hz.
  3. Compute the insertion loss for the enclosure in each octave band.

Surface Area αααα ττττ

Measurement of Insertion Loss and Sound Power

  1. Measure the SPL of the ILG source, uncovered and covered by the enclosure. (in octave bands from 250 to 4000 Hz)
  2. Calculate the insertion loss (the difference in levels with and without the enclosure) Measured Calculated Insertion Loss (dB)

Reporting Requirements: Submit a brief, concise lab report. Comment on the agreement between predicted and measured insertion loss. What are some possible reasons for any observed discrepancies? What design changes could be made to improve the effectiveness of the enclosure?