Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Essay on Composition and Reading | ENGL 122, Study notes of English Language

essay1 Material Type: Notes; Professor: Fischer; Class: Freshman English: Composition and Reading; Subject: English; University: Diablo Valley College; Term: Spring 2011;

Typology: Study notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 08/11/2011

soku628
soku628 🇺🇸

1 document

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Be Different! (Like Everyone Else!)
By LUC SANTE
(note to students: This is in Seeing and
Writing (409).
Are you a unique individual? What a stupid
question! How could you not be? You are
the only person ever to have been born at
12:08:32 A.M. on June 17, 1973, in the
maternity ward of Enos T. Throop
Memorial Hospital in Picpus, N.Y. You are
easily distinguishable from the infants born
in the same location on the same day at
12:07 and 12:09, respectively -- their
parents were different from yours, for one
thing, unless, of course, you are one of a set
of twins or triplets. Even then, your
fingerprints will be unique, and the graph
of your voiceprint equally singular,
identifiably yours alone, even when you
talk in a growl or a falsetto. Anyway, the
important thing is that you know that you
are you, an inimitable human being, with a
collection of tastes, tendencies, tropisms,
penchants and small perversities that have
never been gathered together in exactly the
same way in the history of the world.
So how do you express this uniqueness of
yours? Maybe you always and unfailingly
wear red socks. Or you wear your watch on
the pulse side of your wrist. Or you have a
hummingbird tattooed just above your
ankle. Or you carry special imported tea bags with you everywhere and will drink nothing else. Or you are
never seen without your tiny, trembling dog. Or you have a cabochon emerald implanted in one of your
front teeth. Or you drive a converted army ambulance. Or you write with a fountain pen the size of a celery
stalk. Or you wear shorts even in winter. Or you wear a baseball cap even to church. Or you wear the same
outfit every day. Or you rig your car with vanity plates that encode your nickname. Or you have everything
monogrammed, down to your unmentionables.
These are hard times for individuality. If you practice any of the above small eccentricities, you've got to
know that at least a zillion people do the same (and that includes the implanted stone in your tooth, which
will forever appear to the casual eye like a forgotten piece of spinach). Even if you engage in some kind of
radical piercing, like encasing both eyebrows in tight rows of small rings, and by this means emphatically
announce to the world that you are not employed in middle management at a Fortune 500 company, you are
hardly doing something unprecedented. The fact that you have carried out such a thing virtually insures that
you've taken notice of all other humans in your town or on your travels who have done the same. Perhaps,
then, you are not proclaiming your individuality so much as establishing your kinship with others of the
same micropersuasion.
The compulsion to express one's individuality by means of eccentric style was for centuries restricted to
members of the aristocracy, the only people who had the means or the time to pay attention to style, much
less to feel constrained by prevalent fashions. Things changed in the 19th century, with the rise of the
bourgeoisie, which imposed a set of instant standards and latter-day traditions upon the general population.
The first people to set themselves apart from these dictates were the earliest bohemians, specifically the
Jeune France crowd in Paris circa 1830, which included Gerard de Nerval, today much better known to
English speakers for having walked a lobster on a leash through the gardens of the Palais Royal than for his
visionary poems. His friends drank wine from human skulls, assumed bizarre names, dyed or perfumed or
Martin Schoeller
Variations on a theme, No. 1: Redheads, female.
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Essay on Composition and Reading | ENGL 122 and more Study notes English Language in PDF only on Docsity!

Be Different! (Like Everyone Else!)

By LUC SANTE (note to students: This is in Seeing and Writing (409). Are you a unique individual? What a stupid question! How could you not be? You are the only person ever to have been born at 12:08:32 A.M. on June 17, 1973, in the maternity ward of Enos T. Throop Memorial Hospital in Picpus, N.Y. You are easily distinguishable from the infants born in the same location on the same day at 12:07 and 12:09, respectively -- their parents were different from yours, for one thing, unless, of course, you are one of a set of twins or triplets. Even then, your fingerprints will be unique, and the graph of your voiceprint equally singular, identifiably yours alone, even when you talk in a growl or a falsetto. Anyway, the important thing is that you know that you are you, an inimitable human being, with a collection of tastes, tendencies, tropisms, penchants and small perversities that have never been gathered together in exactly the same way in the history of the world. So how do you express this uniqueness of yours? Maybe you always and unfailingly wear red socks. Or you wear your watch on the pulse side of your wrist. Or you have a hummingbird tattooed just above your ankle. Or you carry special imported tea bags with you everywhere and will drink nothing else. Or you are never seen without your tiny, trembling dog. Or you have a cabochon emerald implanted in one of your front teeth. Or you drive a converted army ambulance. Or you write with a fountain pen the size of a celery stalk. Or you wear shorts even in winter. Or you wear a baseball cap even to church. Or you wear the same outfit every day. Or you rig your car with vanity plates that encode your nickname. Or you have everything monogrammed, down to your unmentionables. These are hard times for individuality. If you practice any of the above small eccentricities, you've got to know that at least a zillion people do the same (and that includes the implanted stone in your tooth, which will forever appear to the casual eye like a forgotten piece of spinach). Even if you engage in some kind of radical piercing, like encasing both eyebrows in tight rows of small rings, and by this means emphatically announce to the world that you are not employed in middle management at a Fortune 500 company, you are hardly doing something unprecedented. The fact that you have carried out such a thing virtually insures that you've taken notice of all other humans in your town or on your travels who have done the same. Perhaps, then, you are not proclaiming your individuality so much as establishing your kinship with others of the same micropersuasion. The compulsion to express one's individuality by means of eccentric style was for centuries restricted to members of the aristocracy, the only people who had the means or the time to pay attention to style, much less to feel constrained by prevalent fashions. Things changed in the 19th century, with the rise of the bourgeoisie, which imposed a set of instant standards and latter-day traditions upon the general population. The first people to set themselves apart from these dictates were the earliest bohemians, specifically the Jeune France crowd in Paris circa 1830, which included Gerard de Nerval, today much better known to English speakers for having walked a lobster on a leash through the gardens of the Palais Royal than for his visionary poems. His friends drank wine from human skulls, assumed bizarre names, dyed or perfumed or Martin Schoeller Variations on a theme, No. 1: Redheads, female.

sculptured their beards in strange shapes, slept in tents pitched on the floors of their garrets and so on. The connection between art and eccentricity was thus forged. Although when monolithic rules were in place it wasn't hard to announce one's uniqueness and, as a bonus, get a rise from the enforcers of those rules. When all men wore black suits, and those suits necessarily had to be cut by tailors, it wasn't much more expensive to procure a bolt of broadcloth in, say, purple, and have a suit made that would cause passers-by to stop in their tracks, in horror, admiration or a hybrid of the two. The United States, meanwhile, has always had an equivocal attitude toward individualism. It has given the idea quite a bit of lip service over the years, in part as a wedge against collectivism and in part with respect to the prevalent notion that success stories are the hard-won results of solo efforts. The "rugged individual" who at least used to figure so often in political rhetoric was generally someone who had built an empire with his bare hands, unless he was a mythic embodiment: the lone prospector, for example. Otherwise, people who looked, talked or acted funny were not often encouraged in their pursuits or invited to move in next door. They might serve as entertainment, but only at a distance. In the waning days of the universal dress code, the Beats were tabloid fixtures for more than a decade, a fascination based on their beards, leotards, berets and perceived reluctance to bathe. You might take a tour bus to go stare at the beatniks in their own habitat, but if they showed up in your town they would be swiftly escorted out again. Their appearance alone would have raised eyebrows, but their homosexuality, race mixing, marijuana and poverty definitely did not fit community standards. In the following decade the hippies appeared, and quite apart from their even longer hair, sometimes wilder mores and more active politics, they were frightening because of their broad success. The Beats were, after all, intellectuals, and so automatically limited in their reach, but the hippies made only vague and easily consumable feints in that direction. The package of lifestyle accessories they promoted actually sold, big time. Less than a decade separated the time when having long hair could get one beaten up from the time when many of those who did the beating grew their own hair over their collars. Yet the allure of being part of a counterculture persisted, an outlaw thrill despite mounting evidence that the outlaws were mainstream. I think it was in the late winter of 1971 that I cut high school to go buy tickets to see the Allman Brothers in Passaic, N.J. As I stood shivering in the endless line for the box office it struck me that every single human being on the line was wearing blue jeans. Somehow I had previously failed to appreciate the inescapability of the phenomenon. As the sociologist Ned Polsky has pointed out, blue jeans, which had formerly been worn only by farmers and miners and cowboys, and then seldom off the job, were one of the beatniks' few lasting contributions to middle-class culture. Well before the end of Richard Nixon's first term they had become a uniform. Blue jeans had thus crossed several lines: from utility to style, from emblem of rebellion to mark of adherence and from in-group insignia to mass-culture requisite. As the tide of human affairs turned yet again during the 1970's, the alleged hipness of blue jeans (along with, to be sure, their comfort, ease and Luc Sante, a frequent contributor to The New York Times Magazine, is the author of "Low Life," "Evidence" and "The Factory of Facts." Martin Schoeller Variations on a theme, No. 2: Redheads, male.

and meals of rice and beans and cheap Chianti. Now it is economically impossible to sacrifice comfort for freedom, not unless you can savor freedom while sleeping in doorways and shelters and holding tanks. Right now, everything is for sale, including you, and if you are not saleable, you will starve. So you tailor and trim and adapt yourself, sand down your edges, maximize your appeal. There is still a you there, but it has gone underground, meaning somewhere deep within.

http://partners.nytimes.com/library/magazine/millennium/m5/different-

sante.html