Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Searcy - Estate & Gift Tax Problems - Fall 1984, Exams of Law

Solutions to various problems related to estate and gift tax as presented in searcy's fall 1984 course material. The problems cover topics such as calculating the taxable estate, analyzing taxable gifts, and understanding the implications of certain trust provisions.

Typology: Exams

2010/2011

Uploaded on 10/06/2011

themask
themask 🇺🇸

4.4

(17)

315 documents

1 / 7

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Searcy - Estate & Gift Tax - Fall 1984
Searcy
Estate and Gift Tax
Fall 1984
Problem 1
Decedent D was a world famous artist whose work
consisted of modern impressionistic paintings. D's will left
all of his estate to his brother Ben. D's will stated that
his primary objective was to avoid paying any federal estate
tax, and D's will provided that in the event that D's
Taxable Estate (TE) would be larger than the amount
sheltered by the sec. 2010 Unified Credit (UC) in effect for
the year of his death then D's executor shall destroy a
sufficient quantity of D's paintings such that the Fair
Market Value (FMV) at the date of D's death of the paintings
not destroyed shall exactly equal the amount sheltered by
the sec. 2010 UC. The only assets in D's estate consisted of
$1,000,000 FMV of paintings made by D. Disregard
administration expenses, debts, the sec. 2054 loss
deduction, and all other deductions; accordingly, D's Gross
Estate (GE) will exactly equal his TE.
D died in 1987, when the UC was $192,000, which will
shelter $600,000 from the Estate Tax (ET). Executor E
complied with the requirement in D's will and destroyed
$400,000 FMV of D's paintings shortly after D's death.
Assume that E's act was lawful and proper under state law.
E argues that by reason of the requirement that $400,000
of the paintings be destroyed, the total net amount which
could be transsmitted by reason or D's death was $600,000,
and that sec. 2033 will impose a tax only on $600,000 of
Gross Estate. Analyze the correct amount of D's sec. 2033
GE.
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Joe/Desktop/past%20exams/EstateF84.htm (1 of 7)7/6/2006 3:01:01 PM
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Searcy - Estate & Gift Tax Problems - Fall 1984 and more Exams Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Searcy

Estate and Gift Tax Fall 1984

Problem 1

Decedent D was a world famous artist whose work consisted of modern impressionistic paintings. D's will left all of his estate to his brother Ben. D's will stated that his primary objective was to avoid paying any federal estate tax, and D's will provided that in the event that D's Taxable Estate (TE) would be larger than the amount sheltered by the sec. 2010 Unified Credit (UC) in effect for the year of his death then D's executor shall destroy a sufficient quantity of D's paintings such that the Fair Market Value (FMV) at the date of D's death of the paintings not destroyed shall exactly equal the amount sheltered by the sec. 2010 UC. The only assets in D's estate consisted of $1,000,000 FMV of paintings made by D. Disregard administration expenses, debts, the sec. 2054 loss deduction, and all other deductions; accordingly, D's Gross Estate (GE) will exactly equal his TE.

D died in 1987, when the UC was $192,000, which will shelter $600,000 from the Estate Tax (ET). Executor E complied with the requirement in D's will and destroyed $400,000 FMV of D's paintings shortly after D's death. Assume that E's act was lawful and proper under state law.

E argues that by reason of the requirement that $400, of the paintings be destroyed, the total net amount which could be transsmitted by reason or D's death was $600,000, and that sec. 2033 will impose a tax only on $600,000 of Gross Estate. Analyze the correct amount of D's sec. 2033 GE.

Problem 2.

Donor D, age 53, transferred corpus of $100,000 cash in 1984 to Trustee T, with instructions to invest the corpus and pay income to D's Father F, age 75, for F's life, remainder to be delivered outright to Donor's adult son S, age 20, or his heirs, provided that until D reaches age 60 or F dies, whichever occurs first, D may substitute himself for Son S as remainderman. Disregard the sec. 2503 PDE throughout this Problem.

2a. Analyze D's Taxable Gifts (TG) with respect to D's 1984 transfer to T.

2b. Six years later, in 1990, when D was age 59, F died at a time when D had never taken any steps to substitute himself for Son S as remainderman. In accordance with the terms of the trust instrument, T delivered all trust property outright and permanently to S. The FMV of the trust corpus was $156,000 throughout 1990. Concisely analyze the amount includible in F's GE with respect to the trust property under sec. 2033 and sec. 2036.

2c. The facts are as in 2b, and prior to F's death in December 1990 T had paid all 1990 trust income, consisting of $13,000, to F. Analyze D's TGs during this year of F's death, including but not limited to T's payment of $13, to F.

2d. Disregard 2b and 2c. The facts are as in 2a. In December, 1990, when D was age 59, D died while F and S were still living. T properly paid all $13,000 of 1990 trust income to F in 1990. Because D never gave T any instructions to substitute D for S as remainderman, T properly continued to hold the trust corpus and T will properly deliver corpus outright to S at such future as F dies. The FMV of trust corpus was $150,000 throughout 1990.

D planned to make annual gifts of corpus to the trust. The trust instrument proceeded to establish appropriate requirements that T notify D (and B's guardian during any period of B's incapacity) promptly of any transfers of corpus by D to the trust, and that S (or his guardian) shall have 60 days after receiving such notice to demand the distribution in writing.

During July 1983 when the trust had nine (9) years of term remaining, D transferred $30,000 cash new corpus to the trust; T notified B (age 13) and both of B's parents of B's right to withdraw $10,000 cash. No guardian had ever been appointed for B. No one gave T any demand for any distribution, and the $30,000 thus became permanent trust corpus. During 1983 the trust corpus out of which T could have satisfied any demand which B mjight have validly made was $120,000.

3a. Explain, citing appropriate authority, the primary objective for inclusion in the trust instrument of the provision which is indented above, and why such a provision

is needed in this particular trust.

3b. Analyze the effectiveness of the indented provision and related provisions in accomplishing the objective, including the acceptability to the IRS of this provision to accomplish the objective.

3c. Assume that B is not entitled to any § 2503 PDE for any Taxable Gifts (TG) that B may have made. Analyze thoroughly B's 1983 TG. Present your answer in a well

organized and complete manner.

Problem 4

Husband H died; H's will left $1,000,000 to Trustee T free of all inheritance and estate taxes and free of any

share of administration or other expenses. The trust is required to distribute all income annually or more frequently to Surviving Spouse W. Upon W's death, all income received from the last distribution until the date of W's death shall be paid to W's estate and all trust corpus shall be distributed outright and equally among the children of the H-W marriage who are living at that time, provided that W may by her will (but not during her life) change the shares among the H-W children living at her death as she

deems appropriate in her absolute discretion.

Assume that W's interest in this trust "passes" to her, that all property rights so passing are included in H's Gross Estate (GE), and that W's interest in the trust is a Terminable Interest (TI) which violates the § 2056(b)(l) Nondeductible Terminable Interest (NTI) rule. Disregard the dollar amount of any MD which is allowable.

4a. Concisely analyze whether W's interest qualifies for the Marital Deduction (MD) in H's estate without H's Executor E taking any action or steps other than normal duties of any executor.

4b. Assuming H's estate may not obtain any MD without E taking some action or steps, analyze whether the nature of each party's rights is such that E may, by taking some action or steps, obtain the MD for H's estate.

Problem 5

Donor D transferred $400,000 cash corpus to Trustee T of a newly formed irrevocable trust. T is required to pay one- third of all net income to Beneficiary A. T has discretion to distribute up to one-half of trust net income to Beneficiary B to provide for B's education and support; T is not required to distribute any amount to B regardless of B's education and support needs. T also has discretion to

minus) before each item. If you need a dollar amount which is not given and cannot be computed from the given facts, make any reasonable assumption necessary to continue with your computation, but be sure to identify your assumed

facts as assumptions. Your method is important.

5a. Compute the amount of money which T distributed to A, B, and C in 1984.

5b. Compute T's Distributable Net Income (DNT) in 1984.

5c. Compute the dollar amount and tax character of all amounts received by A, B, and C from the trust.