

























Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Positive consumption externality: When an individual's con- sumption increases the well-being of others but the individual is not compensated by those others.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 33
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
131 Undergraduate Public Economics Emmanuel Saez UC Berkeley
Chapter 5
5.1 Externality Theory
5.2 Private-Sector Solutions to Negative Externalities
5.3 Public-Sector Remedies for Externalities
5.4 Distinctions Between Price and Quantity Approaches to Addressing Externalities
5.5 Conclusion
Negative production externality: When a firm’s production reduces the well-being of others who are not compensated by the firm.
Private marginal cost (PMC): The direct cost to producers of producing an additional unit of a good
Marginal Damage (MD): Any additional costs associated with the production of the good that are imposed on others but that producers do not pay
Social marginal cost (SMC = PMC + MD): The private marginal cost to producers plus marginal damage
Example: steel plant pollutes a river but plant does not face any pollution regulation (and hence ignores pollution when deciding how much to produce)
Chapter 5 Externalities: Problems and Solutions
© 2007 Worth Publishers Public Finance and Public Policy , 2/e, Jonathan Gruber 6 of 33
Chapter 5 Externalities: Problems and Solutions
© 2007 Worth Publishers Public Finance and Public Policy , 2/e, Jonathan Gruber 10 of 33
Chapter 5 Externalities: Problems and Solutions
© 2007 Worth Publishers Public Finance and Public Policy , 2/e, Jonathan Gruber 11 of 33
The typical driver today is in a car that weighs 4,089 pounds. The major culprits in this evolution of car size are sport utility vehicles (SUVs) with an average weight size of 4,500 pounds. The consumption of large cars such as SUVs produces three types of negative externalities: Environmental Externalities: The contribution of driving to global warming is directly proportional to the amount of fossil fuel a vehicle requires to travel a mile. SUV drivers use more gas to go to work or run their errands, increasing fossil fuel emissions. Wear and Tear on Roads: Each year, federal, state, and local governments spend $33.2 billion repairing our roadways. Damage to roadways comes from many sources, but a major culprit is the passenger vehicle, and the damage it does to the roads is proportional to vehicle weight. Safety Externalities: One major appeal of SUVs is that they provide a feeling of security because they are so much larger than other cars on the road. Offsetting this feeling of security is the added insecurity imposed on other cars on the road.
Chapter 5 Externalities: Problems and Solutions
© 2007 Worth Publishers Public Finance and Public Policy , 2/e, Jonathan Gruber 13 of 33
With a free market, quantity and price are such that P M B = P M C
Social optimum is such that SM B = SM C
⇒ Private market leads to an inefficient outcome (1st welfare theorem does not work)
Negative production externalities lead to over production
Positive production externalities lead to under production
Negative consumption externalities lead to over consumption
Positive consumption externalities lead to under consumption
Key question raised by Ronald Coase (famous Nobel Prize winner Chicago libertarian economist):
Are externalities really outside the market mechanism?
Internalizing the externality: When either private negotia- tions or government action lead the price to the party to fully reflect the external costs or benefits of that party’s actions.
Coase Theorem (Part I): When there are well-defined prop- erty rights and costless bargaining, then negotiations between the party creating the externality and the party affected by the externality can bring about the socially optimal market quantity.
Coase Theorem (Part II): The efficient solution to an exter- nality does not depend on which party is assigned the property rights, as long as someone is assigned those rights.
Chapter 5 Externalities: Problems and Solutions
© 2007 Worth Publishers Public Finance and Public Policy , 2/e, Jonathan Gruber 16 of 33
In practice, the Coase theorem is unlikely to solve many of the types of externalities that cause market failures.
The assignment problem: In cases where externalities affect many agents (e.g. global warming), assigning property rights is difficult ⇒ Coasian solutions are likely to be more effective for small, localized externalities than for larger, more global externalities involving large number of people and firms.
The holdout problem: Shared ownership of property rights gives each owner power over all the others (because joint owners have to all agree to the Coasian solution)
As with the assignment problem, the holdout problem would be amplified with an externality involving many parties.
Ronald Coase’s insight that externalities can sometimes be internalized was useful.
It provides the competitive market model with a defense against the onslaught of market failures.
It is also an excellent reason to suspect that the market may be able to internalize some small-scale, localized externalities.
It won’t help with large-scale, global externalities, where only a “government” can successfully aggregate the interests of all individuals suffering from externality
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was formed in 1970 to provide public-sector solutions to the problems of ex- ternalities in the environment.
Public policy makers employ two types of remedies to resolve the problems associated with negative externalities:
price policy: corrective tax or subsidy equal to marginal damage per unit
quantity regulation: government forces firms to produce the socially efficient quantity