Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Fallacies of Presumption Answers - Introduction to Logic | PHIL 103, Papers of Reasoning

Material Type: Paper; Class: Introduction to Logic; Subject: Philosophy; University: Lander University; Term: Fall 2008;

Typology: Papers

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/18/2009

koofers-user-o8y
koofers-user-o8y 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic
Class Exercise: Fallacies of Presumption Answers
Version 1.1 c
2008 GFDL
Directions : Identify the informal fallacies in the following passages. Choose
from the fallacies of complex question, false cause, petitio principii, accident,
and converse accident.
1. Studying a sub ject too much and in too much depth is often confusing
for the reason that when you study so much and so intensively the main
points of the subject are no longer clear.
petitio principii. The premiss and the conclusion of this argument
are logically equivalent, so no supporting reasons are being offered
for the conclusion.
2. Studies have shown that people who attend sports events regularly suffer
more cardiac arrests on the average than those people who do not attend
regularly. Thus, we can confidently conclude that regular attendance at
sports events is a important factor producing poor cardiac health.
false cause. (post hoc ergo propter hoc ). The argument states
that attendance at sports events are often occasioned by persons
suffering cardiac arrests, so the attendance is the cause of heart
trouble. One event following another is not a sufficient reason
to conclude that the first event caused the second to occur.
3. Even though Bob Smith worked long and hard hours on the corporate
summer progress report, the chairman of the finance committee showed
that Smith’s efforts amounted to a superficial presentation. It’s obvious
that Bob just can’t be relied upon to produce adequate rep orts.
converse accident. Simply because one person concludes that Smith’s
report was inadequate, it cannot be logically concluded that all
of his writing would be substandard.
4. How can the nation cover rising health care costs, pass legislation for lower
taxes for our citizens, support our armed forces for a strong national de-
fense, protect the farmer from high interest rates and rising fuel costs,
and simplify the bewildering array of interstate commerce laws? It’s obvi-
ous that major the political parties can’t do this—there’s only one viable
solution, vote Independent in the next election.
1
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Fallacies of Presumption Answers - Introduction to Logic | PHIL 103 and more Papers Reasoning in PDF only on Docsity!

Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic

Class Exercise: Fallacies of Presumption Answers

Version 1.1 ©c2008 GFDL

Directions: Identify the informal fallacies in the following passages. Choose from the fallacies of complex question, false cause, petitio principii, accident, and converse accident.

  1. Studying a subject too much and in too much depth is often confusing for the reason that when you study so much and so intensively the main points of the subject are no longer clear. petitio principii. The premiss and the conclusion of this argument are logically equivalent, so no supporting reasons are being offered for the conclusion.
  2. Studies have shown that people who attend sports events regularly suffer more cardiac arrests on the average than those people who do not attend regularly. Thus, we can confidently conclude that regular attendance at sports events is a important factor producing poor cardiac health. false cause. (post hoc ergo propter hoc ). The argument states that attendance at sports events are often occasioned by persons suffering cardiac arrests, so the attendance is the cause of heart trouble. One event following another is not a sufficient reason to conclude that the first event caused the second to occur.
  3. Even though Bob Smith worked long and hard hours on the corporate summer progress report, the chairman of the finance committee showed that Smith’s efforts amounted to a superficial presentation. It’s obvious that Bob just can’t be relied upon to produce adequate reports. converse accident. Simply because one person concludes that Smith’s report was inadequate, it cannot be logically concluded that all of his writing would be substandard.
  4. How can the nation cover rising health care costs, pass legislation for lower taxes for our citizens, support our armed forces for a strong national de- fense, protect the farmer from high interest rates and rising fuel costs, and simplify the bewildering array of interstate commerce laws? It’s obvi- ous that major the political parties can’t do this—there’s only one viable solution, vote Independent in the next election.

complex question. The passage assumes that contrarily opposed national problems only admit of solution by voting Independent without any evidence adduced for this assumption.

  1. Reporters for the national media have pointed out that at one time or another Richard Nixon, Lyndon Johnson, and Bill Clinton all met with major corporate lobbyists in their Washington offices before they became President. It’s a foregone conclusion of these news stories that all politi- cians at one time or another fall under the spell of these influence peddlers. converse accident. From the supposed fact that three U. S. Presidents met with lobbyists, it does not follow that all politicians are influenced by lobbyists. Additionally three Presidents are atypical of the class of politicians.
  2. Much as the result of civil rights legislation over the past fifty years, the laws of the United States clearly oppose discrimination on the basis of race, gender, or religious belief. For this reason, the Greenwood Women’s Book Club as well as the Greenwood Men’s Garden Club should prove to be illegal organizations. accident. The civil rights legislation does not apply to private organizations, which are exempt, and so are exceptions to the civil rights laws.
  3. There can be no doubt that women are better poets than men because they uniformly write better poetry than men do and men plainly do not write poetry as well. petitio principii. The premiss and the conclusion of this argument are logically equivalent, so no statement is proved.
  4. I can see that you are greatly impressed with this logic course and all the new ideas you are learning. Therefore, are you going to sign up for scientific reasoning or symbolic logic next semester? Either one or both would be fine. complex question. The presupposition that if one likes a logic course, then one will, for that reason, consider enrolling in one of two related courses is unfounded.
  5. George H. Wendelmyer, the Nobel Prize winning chemist, became a great researcher because in his early childhood, his parents and his teachers felt that he wouldn’t amount to much. Had they nagged him to study science, he never would have developed a life-long interest in the molecular forces of nature. false cause. (post hoc ergo propter hoc ) From the facts that Wendelmyer was neglected as a child and he made significant scientific discoveries later in life, we cannot logically conclude that events in his childhood were the cause of the discoveries he made later.

complex question. The argument presupposes by the phrasing of the question that no persons or events can prevent someone becoming knowledgeable about himself or herself simply on the basis that such an individual would be unable to identify such a person or event at the present time.

  1. The programs of the Fair Play for Animals Committee are sound and thoughtful policies for the improvement of our National Parks and have been endorsed by the Federal Wildlife Conservancy Project. The endorse- ment by the Federal Wildlife Conservancy Project is known to be a reliable recommendation because the Fair Play for Animals Committee has backed the Conservancy since its inception. petitio principii. The programs of the Fair Play for Animals Committee are said to be endorsed by the Federal Wildlife Conservancy Project which, in turn, is endorsed by the Fair Play for Animals Committee, the same committee whose programs are at issue.
  2. Statistical data drawn from the U. S. Census Bureau’s Census 2000 data show that counties in southeastern United States have on the average the highest per capita murder rates in the nation. These data also show that these same counties have the highest per capita members of religious fundamentalist churches. Consequently, the deep and strict adherence to basic principles and the resulting intolerance represented by prevalent attitudes endemic to these areas contribute to higher rates of violence. false cause. (non causa pro cause From the fact that two kinds of events occur in a geographic location, it does not follow that one kind of events would be the cause the other kind.
  3. If there is one rule that all children should follow it’s “Honesty is the best policy.” Moral rules have no exceptions. So when any adult not known to the child asks a child at home if her parents are there and the child does not tell the truth when responding, “Yes, but they cannot come to the door right now,” then the child should be punished for violating this fundamental moral rule. accident. A general moral rule is being applied in a unusual circumstance not subsumable under the scope of the rule. That is, the circumstance being described where the child might be in danger is an exceptional case, a circumstance in which it would be correct for the child not to tell the truth.
  4. Last Saturday morning I went to the library to work on my psychology term theme. The library was closed. I can’t see how instructors at this university can expect us to get our research done when the library is never open when you need it. converse accident. From one occasion of finding the library closed, one cannot conclude that the library is always closed.
  1. The Department of Education is puzzled by all of the criticism of the cur- rent K–12 policies instituted over the past twenty years in this state. After all, are these critics opposed to the educational programs that produced the workforce achieving the largest increase in scientific advancement and expansion of business and industry since the American Revolution? It’s difficult to see how a return to old, outdated policies would be an improve- ment. complex question. The phrasing of the argument presupposes that K--12 educational programs produced salutary effects on science and industry and the only kinds of policies that could be instituted are either the present ones or the previous policies. Neither assumption is warranted without some evidence presented.