Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Fiat Money Economy - Banking - Lecture Slides, Slides of Banking and Finance

Banking is an ever green field of study. In these slides of Banking, the Lecturer has discussed following important points : Fiat Money Economy, Ad Hoc Formulation, Miuf Approach, Theory of Monetary Exchange, Laissez Faire, Critical Evaluation, Intergenerational Contracts, Legal Restrictions, Miuf and Cia, Inconvertibility

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 07/29/2013

sathyanarayana
sathyanarayana 🇮🇳

4.4

(21)

140 documents

1 / 28

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Lecture 3
The Microfoundations of Money -
Part 2
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c

Partial preview of the text

Download Fiat Money Economy - Banking - Lecture Slides and more Slides Banking and Finance in PDF only on Docsity!

Lecture 3

The Microfoundations of Money -

Part 2

  • Dissatisfaction with ad hoc formulation and

MIUF approach

  • OLG - a theory of monetary exchange under

Laissez Faire

  • Critical evaluation of OLG - purely a store of

value

  • Intergenerational contracts
  • Legal restrictions
  • Another look at MIUF and CIA

Fiat Money Theory

• 1. Abandon the conditions of inconvertibility

and intrinsic uselessness

• 2. Impose legal restrictions to give money

value

• 3. Model the notion that fiat money facilitates

exchange

Overlapping Generations Model (OLG)

The Young have endowment of 1 unit of labour and consumption preference

of

ct and c t + 1

when old.

The old has no endowment but have consumption of c t

Output is storable but depreciates at the rate δ, so γ

Let kt = the amount of output stored in period t

mt = the quantity of real money held by the young at end period t

y = f(n) = f(1)

The young chooses,

~ c t

, c t + 1

, kt, and mt that maximises;

u u c c t t

=

(

~ , )

1

~ c k m y t t t t

    • =

c k v m

P

P

t t t t

t

t

= + +

1 1 

1

γ

Let M M t t = + − ( 1 ) 1 μ

μ ≥ − 1

The interior solution for a monetary equilibrium occurs when kt = 0

A condition of equilibrium is μ < δ which demonstrates the ‘tenuousness of

equilibrium’.

Consumption of the existing old

t

t t t P

M

C = y− −C−)+

Autarky-no trade (M=0)

C*t+

Y Ct

γY

Monetary equilibrium (M≠0)

C*t+

Y Ct

γY

  • Notice that with no

inflation P t+

= P t

and Y >

γY

  • If inflation increases P t+

P t

then the upper budget

line swings down.

  • When P t

/P t+

= γ, the

young are indifferent

between storing their

output and receiving

money from the old.

Y(P/P t+

)

Critique

• Ignores medium of exchange function

• does not explain, why store of value function

is not dominated by contracts

• But Wallace says that medium of exchange

occurs inter-generationally

• McCallum says that an economy with a

medium of exchange is more efficient than

one without

Money in the Indirect Utility Function

(MIIUF)

Utility function u = u(ct, lt, ct+1, lt+1)

c = consumption, l = leisure

lt = 1-nt-st

nt = amount of labour time expended in work

st = amount of labour time expended in search

say st = ϕ(mt)

ϕ‘ < 0

this leads to the composite function

u =

u (ct, nt, mt, ct+1, nt+1,mt+1)

which resembles the MIUF approach. Note that unlike the simple MIUF

approach where,

u
m

→ ∞ as^ m → 0

In the indirect utility approach if m = 0, this simply implies that the

holding costs of money are too high. Similarly it allows satiation to be

reached with finite m if ϕ (^) ′′ > 0. Giving money a framework such as this

does not imply that money is ‘intrinsically useless’.

C-I-A continued

Households are assumed to maximise a discounted expected utility function;

E β

t t t

U c

=

1

1

where 0 < β < 1

subject to c

m m

P

t b^ b^ y^ r b

t t

t

  • (^) t t t t t
 +^ −^ =^ +

− − −

1 1 1

where {yt}, is an endowment of income, {Pt}is the price of goods in terms of

money, {bt} is a vector of the real value of other assets, {rt}is the vector of

returns paid on the other assets, {ct} is consumption at time t.

The cash-in-advance constraint is

c

m

P

t

t

t

  • 1

C-I-A

• One of the criticisms of this model is that it

implies a demand for money that is insensitive

to the rate of interest and also has a unit

income elasticity of demand for money.