



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Research paper Research paper on the foraging behaviour of apis species in western Himalaya. This paper compares the foraging behaviour of our native bee species and the european hone bee Apis mellifera in sub tropical ecosystem
Typology: Thesis
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Naveen C. Joshi and P.C. Joshi
Department of Zoology and Environmental Sciences Gurukula Kangri University, Haridwar (U.K.) - 249404, India. prakash127@yahoo.com
Abstract: Observations on foraging behaviour, time spent per flower and number of flowers visited per minute by the two species of honey bee viz. Apis cerana and A. mellifera were made and a significant and nonlinear relationship was found. The number of flowers visited by each bee was also examined and it was found that A. cerana visited higher number of flowers than that of A. mellifera. Similarly the exotic A. mellifera carried heavier pollen loads than the native bee A. cerana. The foraging activity of A. cerana was observed at a peak between 1100 to 1300 hrs and then a steady decline was recorded which abruptly decreased between 1700 to 1800 hrs. However, in the case of A. mellifera , the increase was steady and reached its peak between 1300 to 1500 hrs. [New York Science Journal 2010;3(3):71-76]. (ISSN: 1554-0200).
Keywords: Foraging, Apis mellifera , Apis cerana , pollen loads
1. Introduction Foraging behavior is one of the important characteristic of any insect. Bees can also be classified as generalists or specialists depending on their foraging habits. Bees that gather nectar and pollen from a wide variety of flowers are generalists. Bumble bees and honey bees are good examples of generalists. Bees that depend on a single plant or a small number of plants for pollen and nectar are categorized as specialists. The criterion used to select candidate pollinator species undoubtedly vary from crop to crop, but some general rules apply. In principle, promising pollinator species should show a preference for foraging on flowers of the target crop (Torchio, 1976; Maeta, 1978; Marquez et al., 1994). Pollination of apples is more complicated as compared to other fruits by the fact that five stigmas have to be pollinated separately (as the transmitting tissue of each style is separate; Pratt, 1988), otherwise misshapen fruits result (Free, 1993). It is estimated that bees accomplish more than 80 percent of the total pollination by the insects. Honeybees are the main pollinators responsible for over 98% of visits to flowers of apple. They are among the most important pollinating insects found within orchards and modern agricultural systems (Williams, 1994; Morse and Calderone, 2000; Sharma et al, 2004). Foraging rate is one of the important factors to compare pollination efficiency of different bee species. More is the foraging frequency more is the pollination efficiency (Singh et. al. 2006). Bees are the most important pollinators, so understanding the scale at which they
forage has important ecological implications and conservation applications (Greenleaf et. al. 2007). The honeybee, A. mellifera is flower constant, which means that on any foraging trip, it focuses on only one kind of flower. Pollen is transferred only between flowers of the same species and this is one of the features that make honey bees so popular for commercial pollination of crops. On the down side, some scientists have expressed concern that honey bees are too efficient in their collection of nectar and pollen, leaving none in a given local flower source for the foraging of other pollinators (Buchmann and Nabhan, 1996; Hubbell, 1997). Consequent overcrowding stresses, however, strongly debilitate the bee populations concerned; nectar and pollen may not suffice to nourish all bees introduced, which thus compete for the resources available, or the bees may experience increased larval mortality (Robinson et al., 1989; Kevan et al., 1995; Strickler, 1996, 1997). In India foraging behavior of Apis spp. has been recorded by different workers on different crops in different localities (Gupta et. al., 1984; Verma and Dutta, 1986; Kapoor and Dhaliwal, 1989; Negi and Joshi, 2006). This study has been carried out in one of the most apple producing areas of Uttarakhand state of India.
2. Materials and Methods The study was carried out during April-June, 2009, which is the peak season of flowering of apple, in one of the apple orchard (situated in Cheepa) in district Nainital of Kumaon Himalayas situated in
Uttarakhand state of India. Village Cheepa is situated at N 29^0 26’07.4” and E 079^0 36’22.8” and is at an altitude of 2150 m. It has apple and peach orchards. The study site is under the Ramgarh block of Mukteshwar area, which is well known for its fruit orchards and fruit production. This study was carried out by placing two colonies each of Indian hive bee A. cerana and European bee A. mellifera. All the bee colonies had almost equal number of frames in brood chamber with similar strength and almost equal amount of brood. The experiment was started when about 15-20% flowering had taken place, so that bees do not forage outside the orchard on the other floral resources. The observations were made for the different foraging parameter continuously for a period of 7 days.
Foraging Time Foraging time of both the species was assessed in terms of timings of commencement and cessation of flight activity and was observed by noting the time when first bee started its flight in the morning and the last bee ceased its flight in the evening.
Foraging Speed and Rate Time spent per flower and number of flowers visited per minutes were taken as the indicators of foraging speed and rate respectively (Free, 1993). Time spent by a worker bee of A. cerana and A. mellifera on apple flower and number of flowers visited per minute were recorded with the help of stop watch with an accuracy of ±1. These observations were taken during 6.00 – 7.00; 11.00- 12.00 and 1700 – 1800 hrs every day and continued for a period of 7 days by calculating the mean of ten sub samples each.
Flight Activity Pattern It was measured in terms of number of bees leaving the hive per minute. These observations were made at regular interval of one hour from 7.00 in the morning to 1800 hrs in the evening. The peak foraging hours were calculated for both the species under observations in terms of maximum number of foragers leaving the hive at a particular hour (Southwood, 1978).
Preference of Tree Heights by the Bees The branches of apple tree bearing about more than 300 flowers each were marked at a height of 2, 4 and above 4 meters and these heights were designated as lower, middle and top heights respectively and the number of honey bees at each height was counted for a period of 10 minutes at 6.
Pollen Carrying Capacity It was calculated in terms of pollen load carried by a worker bee of both the species during different hours of observations (900, 1200 hrs). To examine the pollen carrying capacity of the bee, individuals were collected whilst foraging, stored in pre weighted small viols coated with ethyl acetate and carried to lab, where they were first weighed along with the bottle (Total net weight) and then the pollen load was removed from the legs of bee. The pollen load detached was weighed in an electronic weighing machine to an accuracy of 0.001 mg. To confirm the results, the weight of the pollen load was also calculated by deducting the weight of the bee and bottle from the total net weight. A mean of ten individual samples each was calculated for the same. Data was recorded from 900 h to 1800 h at time of opening of flowers.
3. Results and Discussions A. cerana proved to be the most frequent pollinator having average population of 1. individuals per plant per 30 sec and A. mellifera remained the second most frequent visitor 0. individuals per plant per 30 sec. Results showed that A. cerana started its activity earlier (1030 h) and attained its peak at 1200 h. However, A. mellifera started at later (1130 h) and got its peak activity at 1400 h (Table 01), which was the end point of A. cerana peak activity. There was no fluctuation in temperature and relative humidity around the flowering period. Weather also remained clear in all the dates of data record.
Foraging Time (Time Spent on Apple Bloom) It was observed that the foraging time of A. cerana was significantly higher than A. mellifera. A. cerana commenced its foraging activity earlier in the morning (mean time 6.09 hrs) than A. mellifera (mean time 6.17 hrs.). Similarly in the evening A. cerana ceased its flight activity (mean time 18. hrs) later than A. mellifera (mean time 18.38 hrs). The flight activity of A. cerana lasted for 12.47±0. hrs while in A. mellifera it lasted for 12.11±0.7 hrs.
Flight Activity Patterns It was monitored for the foraging activity of both the bee species at regular intervals between 0700 hrs to 1800 hrs. As the flowers opened in the morning, peak visitation by bees took place in late morning hours (1030 h to 1230 h). Flight activity pattern of both the species has been presented in Table 1 and Fig. 1. A steady increase in the flight
Table 1. Foraging Activity of Bee Species A. cerana and A. mellifera During Different Hours of the Day.
Figure 1: Graphical Representation of Foraging Activity of Bee Species A. cerana And A. mellifera During
Different Hours of the Day.
Bee species Time in hours 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
A. Cerena 26.83 34.33 44.19 67.77 88.61 92.21 91.11 88.12 61.44 50.13 33.31 16. ±1.33 ± 2.56 ± 2.43 ± 1.98 ± 2.47 ±1.11 ±2.16 ± 2.01 ± 1.39 ± 2.31 ±1.01 ±1.
A. mellifera 18.22 22.34 38.11 59.78 73.00 79.67 82.98 88.46 86.33 71.66 36.73 11. ±1.13 ± 1.36 ± 2.13 ± 1.66 ± 2.07 ±1.11 ±2.11 ± 2.11 ± 1.09 ± 1.42 ±1.51 ±1. 22
Table 2. Commencement, Cessation and Duration of Foraging Activity of A. cerana and A. mellifera****.
Bee species Commencement Cessation Duration (hrs) Speed and rate
A. cerana 6.06-6.11 18.53-19.07 12.47 5.11 ±0. 10.71± 0.
A. Mellifera 6.12-6-20 18.24- 18.52 12.12 7.43±0. 8.44 ± 0.
The present study indicates that A. cerana is much more efficient pollinator for the sub tropical region than the A. mellifera. There have been earlier reports on the time spent by A. mellifera on apple flowers. Rymahesvskii (1956) has reported that this species spends more than 30 seconds on the flowers of apple; Verma and Dutta (1986) reported this time as 6.65. Singh (1979) reported maximum number of A. cerana (5.66) at 1400 hrs on strawberry flowers. The time spent by any bee on any flower depends on many factors including size of flower and nectar present in the flower. Verma and Dutta (1986) reported that A. mellifera visits 3.33 flowers of apple per minute. In the present study maximum foraging rate of Apis species was observed between 1200 – 1300 hrs, the same observations have also been reported by many workers (Dhaliwal and Bhalla, 1980; Raj and Rana, 1994; Anon, 1999; Singh et al., 2006). In the present study it was observed that A. mellifera carries 11.19 ± 0. 11 mg of pollent load at 1200 hrs, which is the highest in both the species, whereas Verma and Dutta ( 1986) have reported this as 12.22 mg in apple, Rana (1989) has reported this as 15.50 mg in plum and Negi and Joshi (2006) has reported this weight as 11.20 mg in Brassica juncea. The behavior of an efficient apple pollinator should be such that the insect contacts the stigma of the flower in many of its visits and carries enough germinable pollen grains of compatible cultivars on its body.
Acknowledgements Authors would like to thank The Uttarakhand state Council for Science and Technology (U-COST), Dehradun, for providing the financial support for this study. Thanks are due to scientists of Zoological Survey of India, Forest Research Institute and Botanical Survey of India, Dehradun, for their co- operation in identifying the insects and plants.
Corresponding Author:
Dr. P. C. Joshi Department of Zoology and Environmental Sciences Gurukula Kangri University, Haridwar- Uttarakhand, India E.-mail: prakash127@yahoo.com
References
Anonymous. Annual report: All India coordinated project on honeybee. Res. and Trg. C.C.S., HAU Hissar 1999;16-20pp. Buchmann SL, Nabhan GP. The Forgotten Pollinators. Island Press, Washington, D.C. 1996:292 pp. Free JB. Insect pollination of crops, 2nd ed London: Academic Press, 1993. Greenleaf SG, Williams NM, Winfree R, Kremen C. Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to the body size. Oecologia 2007;153:589-596. Gupta JK, Mishra RC, Kumar J. Plectran rogasus as forage for Apis cerana F. and A. mellifera L. Apiidologic 1984;15:75-82. Hubbell S. Trouble with Honeybees. Natural History 1997;106(4):32-41. Kapoor KS, Dhaliwal HS. Comparative foraging strategies of Apis cerana indica and Apis mellifera L. on cauliflower. Indian Bee Journal 1989;51(3):99-101. Kevan PG, Punchihewa RWK, Greco CF. Foraging range for Apis cerana and its implication of honey production and apiary management. In: Kevan P.G., ed. The Asiatic hive bee. Apiculture, biology, and role in sustainable development in tropical and subtropical Asia. ON, Canada: Cambridge, Enviroquest 1995;223-228. Maeta Y. Comparative studies on the biology of the bees of the genus Osmia in Japan, with special reference to their management for pollination of crops (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Bulletin of the Tohoku