


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Foun1101-Sci med tech Journal Entry 2
Typology: Essays (university)
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
It is now week 3 of U.W.I and classes are starting to get hectic; all 5 course assignments are due in the same week with each one requiring multiple days of work, effort and editing to produce decent quality material to be submitted/presented and critiqued harshly for a tiny percentage of my final grade. Nevertheless, this week’s lecture targeted observations, experimentation, theories and models. Before I could understand scientific models and how they are achieved I was shown the methods that past philosophers used to gain scientific knowledge to generate conclusions. Two main philosophers were mentioned, Plato, whom I have heard of before, and Aristotle, whom I have not, both having two very different approaches and beliefs. The former, insisting that scientific knowledge can be obtained by rationalism; by using our knowledge of how the world works, we can understand how something works. I’m no scientist, but this approach seems to not make sense to me since humans do not possess all the knowledge in the world in the first place so how can they use rationalism to explain how something that they have no knowledge of works? Aristotle however, firmly believed that knowledge could only be gained by generating evidence to build upon what is already known. Nowadays, the more predominant method to gain scientific knowledge is by observation and experimentation which will generate a scientific theory. Beliefs without the support of observational data do not form part of science (Mckenzie, 2003, p. 72). Observation, in my own words, entails recording how a subject/object being studied behaves either presently or over a period of time. Since my first lecture I have been observing a lot of things around me such as on Tuesdays, there is more traffic at 8 a.m. rather than at 7 a.m. in Piarco. I always thought that in science, quantitative observation would be the only accepted method of observation so it came as a surprise to me that both quantitative and qualitative observation is welcomed however quantitative is a little more favored which is to be expected. It was quite shocking to me that the lecturer had to explain that there is a difference between observation and experimentation, I thought that it was obvious but, I guess persons doing this course really disliked science in school. Merriam-Webster (n.d.), defines experimentation as an operation or procedure carried
out under controlled conditions in order to discover an unknown effect or law, to test or establish a hypothesis, or to illustrate a known law. It is a systematic process by using combination of dependent, independent and controlled variables to provide evidence for/against a hypothesis. Experiments are so common that they are carried out every day without even knowing it. For example, I hypothesized that my fried rice would taste better with fresh minced garlic added into it so, the next time I made fried rice I prepared it exactly the same (controlled variable) but added freshly chopped garlic (independent variable) and served it to my mother, father and my brother (dependent variables) in which all 3 concluded that this batch of fried rice tasted better than the previous batch. Additionally, experiments can be either controlled or field experiments. Controlled basically means it is conducted in a highly specific and set up environment whereas field experiments happen in the natural environment. From my understanding, scientific theories are general statements that accurately explains how something works and is concluded from using a scientific method containing numerous observations and experiments, not forgetting that it cannot be explained mathematically. For example, if I perform baldy in an exam, my mother will become upset. Scientific theories are empirically testable, as well as falsifiable if it can be contradicted logically using said empirical tests, it is progressive, meaning it build upon previous theories and is tentative, meaning that it is not proclaiming to be fully accurate. Often confused with scientific theories, scientific laws are a prediction of what scientists expect to happen every time under certain conditions and can be explained mathematically. Scientific laws describe an observed pattern for e.g. the law of dynamics which helps us create aerodynamically efficient planes to fly. It is important to note that scientific laws do not explain why something happens. Last but not least, a scientific model is an imagined mechanism or process that represents the real mechanism or process (Mckenzie, 2003, p. 78). In retrospect, I really haven’t reflected on past experiences at all and, if it wasn’t for this journal, I would have never appreciated how much reflection helps to better understand a topic or clarify misconceptions had previously. This will be something that I will improve on furthering into my degree at U.W.I.; trying to reflect more on what is being done in my courses.
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Experiment. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved September 25, 2022, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/experiment