Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Gettier's Critique on JTB Theory of Knowledge: Necessary but Not Sufficient Conditions, Slides of Philosophy

Gettier's critique on the JTB (Justified True Belief) theory of knowledge. Gettier argues that while the conditions of belief, justification, and truth are necessary for knowledge, they are not sufficient. two examples, Jones and the job interview, and Smith and the unidentified car, to illustrate this point. Gettier's critique challenges the philosophical community to reconsider the nature of knowledge and its relationship to belief and justification.

What you will learn

  • What are the necessary conditions for knowledge according to the JTB theory?
  • Why does Gettier argue that the JTB conditions are not sufficient for knowledge?
  • How does Gettier's critique impact our understanding of the nature of knowledge?

Typology: Slides

2021/2022

Uploaded on 03/31/2022

damyen
damyen 🇺🇸

4.4

(27)

274 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Gettier on the JTB theory
The JTB theory is an attempt to give an analysis of the
concept of knowledge. It tries to “break the concept down” by
giving necessary and sufficient conditions for knowledge.
JTB:
A person Q knows that P if and only if:
1) Q believes that P
2) Q is justified in believing that P
3) P is true
Let’s first consider whether these are necessary conditions for
knowledge
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Gettier's Critique on JTB Theory of Knowledge: Necessary but Not Sufficient Conditions and more Slides Philosophy in PDF only on Docsity!

Gettier on the JTB theory

The JTB theory is an attempt to give an

analysis

of the

concept of knowledge. It tries to “break the concept down” bygiving

necessary and sufficient

conditions for knowledge.

JTB:

A person Q knows that P if and only if:1)^

Q believes that P 2)^

Q is justified in believing that P 3)^

P is true

Let’s first consider whether these are

necessary

conditions for

knowledge

Gettier on the JTB theory

A person Q knows that P if and only if:

1)^

Q believes that P 2)^

Q is justified in believing that P 3)^

P is true

________________

First, let’s remove (1). Can we imagine a case in which Iknow something without

believing

it?

Gettier on the JTB theory

A person Q knows that P if and only if:

1)^

Q believes that P 2)^

Q is justified in believing that P 3)^

P is true

________________

Finally, let’s consider (3). Can I know something that isn’ttrue? It looks like the conditions above may well be

necessary

to

constitute knowledge. But are they

sufficient

? Gettier doesn’t

think so, and he offers two examples to support his view.

Gettier on the JTB theory

CASE 1:

Jones and the job interview. Gettier claims that Smith has a belief that is true andjustified. He does not think, however, that we willintuitively grant that Smith

knows

that “the man who will

get the job has ten coins in his pocket.” Intuition test 1:

Does this case really satisfy the three JTBconditions?

Intuition test 2:

Do we want to say that Smith knows that“the man who will get the job has tencoins in his pocket”?