Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Jurisdiction and Forum Selection in International Business: A Case Study Analysis, Quizzes of Business and Labour Law

An in-depth analysis of various international business law cases focusing on jurisdiction and forum selection. Topics include the role of federal and state courts, jurisdictional requirements, forum selection clauses, and the impact of sovereign immunity. Cases discussed include asahi metal vs. California, big sky network vs. Sichuan, carnival cruise vs. Shute, interfab vs. Valiant, mitsubishi motors vs soler, and others.

Typology: Quizzes

2012/2013

Uploaded on 11/21/2013

beanmat
beanmat 🇺🇸

7 documents

1 / 15

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
TERM 1
ASAHI Metal vs. California
DEFINITION 1
Class 5 lecture about Jurisdiction.In this case specific
jurisdiction is established because the tire valves were
manufactured with the idea of being sold in California making
it a purposeful act.Also a cause of relatedness because
lawsuit arose out of the tire valve act.Federal Court because
of Federal question or diversity
TERM 2
Big Sky Network vs. Sichuan
DEFINITION 2
Joint Venture with ChineseBig Sky MoneyHawa right to do
businessWhen can you sue a sovereign government?two
exceptions: commercial activity section and ICSID agreement
(lawsuit through arbitrage)
TERM 3
Carnival Cruise vs. Shute
DEFINITION 3
this case brings up the point that a unilateral forum selection
clause is invalid.forum selection clauses must come after
negotiations, both parties with equal bargaining power, and
be international in nature
TERM 4
Interfab vs. Valiant
Indus
DEFINITION 4
choice of law is determined by where the goods were
delivered
TERM 5
Mitsubishi Motors vs Soler
DEFINITION 5
dealer loses his constitutional rights because the lawsuit is
handled under arbitration in Japan.the supreme court has
never overturned an enforcement of arbitration
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Partial preview of the text

Download Jurisdiction and Forum Selection in International Business: A Case Study Analysis and more Quizzes Business and Labour Law in PDF only on Docsity!

ASAHI Metal vs. California

Class 5 lecture about Jurisdiction.In this case specific jurisdiction is established because the tire valves were manufactured with the idea of being sold in California making it a purposeful act.Also a cause of relatedness because lawsuit arose out of the tire valve act.Federal Court because of Federal question or diversity TERM 2

Big Sky Network vs. Sichuan

DEFINITION 2 Joint Venture with ChineseBig Sky MoneyHawa right to do businessWhen can you sue a sovereign government?two exceptions: commercial activity section and ICSID agreement (lawsuit through arbitrage) TERM 3

Carnival Cruise vs. Shute

DEFINITION 3 this case brings up the point that a unilateral forum selection clause is invalid.forum selection clauses must come after negotiations, both parties with equal bargaining power, and be international in nature TERM 4

Interfab vs. Valiant

Indus

DEFINITION 4 choice of law is determined by where the goods were delivered TERM 5

Mitsubishi Motors vs Soler

DEFINITION 5 dealer loses his constitutional rights because the lawsuit is handled under arbitration in Japan.the supreme court has never overturned an enforcement of arbitration

Asante Technologies vs

Sierra

international contract because the headquarters of one is in canada and the other america TERM 7

Filanto vs

Chilewich

DEFINITION 7 the contract was accepted by the production of the boots and arbitration was made TERM 8

MCC-Marble v

Cermica

DEFINITION 8 once the contract is signed then it is done. TERM 9

Contracts

DEFINITION 9 Handled at the state level TERM 10

Federal Questions

DEFINITION 10 relates to subject matter jurisdiction and case can be taken to the federal court system.1. Violating a federal statute. (SEC-insider trading)2. Violating the US Constitution3. Violating a Treaty4. When the US is a plaintiff or defendant

Can you file suit of a wholly owned subsidiary

on a providence?

No the sovereign is immune to lawsuit...periodunless there is an exception(FSIA) creates exception to this TERM 17

Doing business with a foreign government?

DEFINITION 17 Big Sky...bad idea TERM 18

Commercial Activity

Section

DEFINITION 18 A forum that you can bring lawsuit against the sovereign.Activity Happened Outside of the US (minimum contact) (creates jurisdiction)Commercial ActivityDirect Effect TERM 19

Specific Jursidiction

DEFINITION 19 2 elementspurposeful actrelatedness TERM 20

General Jurisdiction

DEFINITION 20 a type of minimal contact (think home depot accident in Kansas and lawsuit in Texas)when the defendant has a continuous and systematic presence in the forum state (brick and mortar store) the lawsuit can be brought there even though it didn't originate there.

diversity requirements

defendant and plaintiff must reside in two different states or US defendant and foreign plaintiff.andmust be seeking more than 75k TERM 22

Removal

DEFINITION 22 No removal if sued in home statedefendant has the right to remove it to federalabsolute diversity so the company has no overlap between plaintiff and defendant TERM 23

Where do companies reside?

DEFINITION 23 state where company has principle place of business (where ceo and execs live) and state where company is incorporatedmost companies have twodont forget about general jurisdiction!!! TERM 24

Fully owned subsidiary

DEFINITION 24 separate legal entity so each would have a principle place of business TERM 25

Court compel the appearance of a non

resident?

DEFINITION 25 when the defendant has minimum contact to where the case is being held (forum state) where the plaintiff elected to file the case

3 factors of specific

jurisdiction

  1. Undue burden on defendant (is assi making money off California)2. Forum state's interest (California has no interest in the case)3. Plaintiff convenience to file lawsuit TERM 32

2nd type of minimal contact

DEFINITION 32 general jurisdiction TERM 33

Commercial Activity

Section

DEFINITION 33 a way you can sue a sovereign government that is doing business in the another country. TERM 34

ICSID

DEFINITION 34 a method of filing a lawsuit against another country by getting them to agree to arbitration by signing the ICSID agreement. Still may not get paid.an investment with another countryVenezuela is not a member TERM 35

Establish Jursidiction

DEFINITION 35 Valid Forum Selection Clausego through the subject matter and personal jurisdiction routine

two ways to prove minimum contact

specific jurisdictiongeneral jurisdiction TERM 37

specific jurisdiction (3 factors)

DEFINITION 37 purposeful act in forumrelatednessreasonableness factor: undue burden TERM 38

general jurisdiction (2 factors)

DEFINITION 38 continuous and systematic presence in statedon't have to prove where the jurisdiction is directed TERM 39

purposeful act

DEFINITION 39 advertisingmarketingworkerswebsite TERM 40

relatedness

DEFINITION 40 had she not been on a cruise the accident wouldn't have happened

New York Convention

countries must compel enforcement of arbitration awards TERM 47

2 types of arbitration

DEFINITION 47 institutionalad hoc TERM 48

institutional arbitration

DEFINITION 48 CIETAC-ChinaInternational Chamber of Commerce (Paris) TERM 49

AD HOC Arbitration

DEFINITION 49 companies select three arbitrators (one by each party and arbitrators select one) and they are paid 15% of the lawsuit no arguing TERM 50

Arbitration Enforcement

DEFINITION 50 upheld unlessinarbitrable (criminal case) or agreement was not validno procedural fairness--->very low levelevident bias- -->obvious or apparentYou cannot appeal!!!!

procedural fairness in arbitration

not notifiedornot heard TERM 52

US Supreme Court upholds Arbitrage

DEFINITION 52 always!it has never been overturned. sexual harassment, brokerage accounts, discrimination TERM 53

arbitrage process

DEFINITION 53 once you win you go to that country and get their courts approval and then you seize what is yours!country has signed the new york treaty TERM 54

Convention of International Sale of

Goods

DEFINITION 54 (CISD) Treaty that has rules of contract law TERM 55

Key non Signatories of CISD

DEFINITION 55 United Kingdom, Taiwan, and several Arab Countries

when CISG doesn't

apply

if the invoice says that the contract will be governed by a specific location TERM 62

Valid Offer (2 reasons)

DEFINITION 62 definitivedirected to one or more specific persons/companies TERM 63

Revocation

DEFINITION 63 revoke an offer before it is accepted TERM 64

what constitutes accepting an offer (

ways)

DEFINITION 64 acceptance is mailedwritten promise to be accepteddetrimental reliance: planning to accept evidence by performing work or hiring. TERM 65

CISG Contract Acceptance

DEFINITION 65 definitive words or actions

Mirror Image Rule

non goods/service/ real estatethe acceptance must be identical to the offerpo and invoice must be the same TERM 67

Mirror Image Exception

DEFINITION 67 the party who pays the invoice has accepted the counteroffer TERM 68

Acceptance effective even if containing non-

material goods like

DEFINITION 68 paymentqualityextent TERM 69

Require CISG contracts in

writing

DEFINITION 69 china, ukraine, russia, argentina TERM 70

Parol Evidence

DEFINITION 70 "oral"us doesn't allow oral comments or promises to contradict the contract if the contract is complete