Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

A Historical Overview of Intelligence: Definitions, Theories, and Tests, Quizzes of Psychology

An in-depth exploration of the concept of intelligence, covering various definitions, theories, and tests. It introduces the works of prominent researchers such as spearman, thurstone, binet, and wechsler, and discusses their contributions to the field. Topics include the g-factor and s-factors, primary mental abilities, intelligence tests, scoring systems, reliability, validity, and cultural differences.

Typology: Quizzes

2011/2012

Uploaded on 02/16/2012

april-pisano
april-pisano 🇺🇸

16 documents

1 / 10

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
TERM 1
Intelligence (general definition)
DEFINITION 1
A person's cognitive ability to learn from experience, to
reason well, to remember important information, and to cope
with the demands of daily life.
TERM 2
Spearman
DEFINITION 2
Intelligence is made up of a G-factor and S-factors.
G-factor: our core, general mental ability
S-factors: specific mental abilities (e.g. numerical ability,
memory.). They largely depend on your g-factor, but
sometimes an S-factor can contradict one's g-factor (e.g.
in idiot savants)
TERM 3
G-factor
DEFINITION 3
Our core, general mental ability (according to Spearman).
TERM 4
S-factors
DEFINITION 4
Specific mental abilities
E.g. numerical ability, memory
Where you stand in these largely depends on your g-
factor. But, an S-factor can sometimes contradict one's g-
factor (e.g. in idiot savants)
TERM 5
Thurstone
DEFINITION 5
Argued that there are 7 distinct mental abilities (our
"primary mental abilities") that deal with verbal, spatial,
and numeric reasoning. He challenged the emphasis on the
g-factor.
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download A Historical Overview of Intelligence: Definitions, Theories, and Tests and more Quizzes Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

Intelligence (general definition)

A person's cognitive ability to learn from experience, to

reason well, to remember important information, and to cope

with the demands of daily life.

TERM 2

Spearman

DEFINITION 2

Intelligence is made up of a G-factor and S-factors.

G-factor: our core, general mental ability

S-factors: specific mental abilities (e.g. numerical ability,

memory.). They largely depend on your g-factor, but

sometimes an S-factor can contradict one's g-factor (e.g.

in idiot savants)

TERM 3

G-factor

DEFINITION 3

Our core, general mental ability (according to Spearman).

TERM 4

S-factors

DEFINITION 4

Specific mental abilities

E.g. numerical ability, memory

Where you stand in these largely depends on your g-

factor. But, an S-factor can sometimes contradict one's g-

factor (e.g. in idiot savants)

TERM 5

Thurstone

DEFINITION 5

Argued that there are 7 distinct mental abilities (our

"primary mental abilities" ) that deal with verbal, spatial,

and numeric reasoning. He challenged the emphasis on the

g-factor.

Guilford

He thought that 7 "primary mental abilities" were too few and came up with 150 factors of intelligence. 2 of the three types of factors are: Operations: the way you process information Contents: what kinds of information you process He also talked about convergent vs. divergent thinking. Convergent thinking: Divergent thinking: the creative use of information to come up with a new solution TERM 7

The 3 factors of intelligence

DEFINITION 7

Verbal

Problem-solving

Practical

TERM 8

Alfred Binet

DEFINITION 8 1st to try to measure intelligence with intelligence tests Assumption: Intelligence increases with age, and a slow child will therefore perform like normal younger children. Test development: gave test to tons of children and grouped the questions according to the highest average age of children able to answer them. Testing an individual: see which age level the individual gets to, and use it to assign the individual a mental age. TERM 9

Alfred Binet's scoring system

DEFINITION 9

Based on mental age.

If MA = Chronological Age, you're normal.

MA < CA -> retarded

MA > CA -> gifted/advanced

TERM 10

Lewis Terman

DEFINITION 10

Created the Stanford-Binet intelligence test

Internal Consistency (Split-Half

Reliability)

If you split the test in half, compute a score on 1 half and a

score on the other, and correlate the 2 scores, you want a

strong correlation between the 2.

TERM 17

Precision

DEFINITION 17

Does the test give 2 people of equal (true) intelligence teh

same score?

TERM 18

Error

DEFINITION 18

There will always be some

TERM 19

Content validity of IQ

tests

DEFINITION 19

Pretty good, given our definition of intelligence.

TERM 20

Accuracy

DEFINITION 20

Does the measure measure what it's supposed to

measure?

Content Validity

Is the content appropriate? Is the behavior/knowledge a

representative sample of all the relevant

behavior/knowledge?

Assessed by an expert in the domain.

From book: A test measures all the knowledge or skills

that are assumed to underlie the construct of interest.

TERM 22

Criterion-Related Validity

DEFINITION 22 Are the test scores related to (i.e. correlated with) behaviors or outcomes they should logically be related to? Sometimes the criterion is in the future, sometimes concurrent From book: The ability of test scores to correlate with meaningful criterion measures (factors that are assumed to be influenced by the construct of interest) and thereby help predict other behaviors (future or concurrent). TERM 23

Construct Validity

DEFINITION 23 Construct: something you can't see but you assume is there and infer from behavior without directly observing it Does the measure measure the construct it's supposed to measure, and the other constructs involved (is your concrete measure mostly capturing the abstract construct you say it is?)? 2 types: convergent and discriminant From book: A test successfully measures teh psychological construct it's designed to measure, as indicated by relations btw test scores and other behaviors it should be related to. TERM 24

Convergent Validity

DEFINITION 24

Do scores agree with scores of other tests measuring the

same thing?

TERM 25

Discriminant Validity

DEFINITION 25

Do scores disagree with measures of constructs they're

supposed to disagree with?

Assessing the role of nature/heredity in

intelligence

You can't just look at families because they share both

genes and environment.

We first looked at twins, with twins studies, mislabeled

twins studies, and adoption studies.

All of these tests suggested that nature/heredity is

definitely involved in intelligence.

TERM 32

Twin studies

DEFINITION 32 If heredity plays a role in intelligence, the scores of identical twins should be more correlated than those of fraternal twins. This indeed the case. Identical twins have have an r of ~0. and fraternal twins have an r of ~.6. This seems to indicate genetic influence. However, identical twins are treated more similarly, so more studies are needed. TERM 33

Adoption studies of the role of heredity vs.

environment in intelligence

DEFINITION 33 Identical twins reared apart had scores that correlated with each other with an r of ~7.2. This suggests that nurture is involved somewhat. The scores of the adopted child were correlated with those of both sets of parents as well as those of adoptive siblings. For both sets of parents, r=~0.24, but for adoptive siblings, r=~0.30. This also suggests environmental influence. TERM 34

Enriched environments

DEFINITION 34 Certain homes/environments promote higher IQs in children. These environments have the following characteristics: Encourage exploration, independence, and experimentation Parents are highly (but not overly involved) with kids and are warm and affectionate. Home has a variety of age-appropriate toys and learning materials. Environment (broad term) has great variety. TERM 35

Reaction Range Hypothesis

DEFINITION 35 A hypothesis about the interaction between nature and nurture. Our genes set the upper and lower limits of how intelligent we'll be. Within that range, it's your environment that determines what it will actually be. The range is usually ~20-25 points, which is a significant number of points. 100 is the center of most of our ranges, so most have a range of 90-110 (similar to normal distribution) It's tough to figure out what your reaction range was when you were born.

Basic research findings about cultural

differences in intelligence

In any group, you'll find a normal distribution within that

group

In any minority group, ave. IQ will be ~3-20 points lower

TERM 37

Jansen's heritability explanation for

ethnic/gender/cultural differences in

intelligence

DEFINITION 37

Since racial and gender groups are by definition genetic,

genetic differences can explain all the differences

between them.

Highly controversial

TERM 38

Problems with Jansen's heritability

explanation

DEFINITION 38 It relies on the highest possible estimates of heritability out there Heritability estimates are sample-specific, i.e. their size depends on the group of people from whom the data were collected. In this case, most estimates came from groups of white Americans. Heritability explains variability within groups but not between them. TERM 39

Culture bias explanation for

ethnic/gender/cultural differences in

intelligence

DEFINITION 39

IQ tests reflect a eurocentric bias and minorities are thus

disadvantaged.

Some evidence to support it, but most of it is weak.

Item analysis (comparing groups on individual items)

doesn't show group differences at all.

TERM 40

Cultural disadvantage explanation for

ethnic/cultural differences in intelligence

DEFINITION 40

Minority groups are generally overrepresented in lower

soceoeconomic status groups, and thus in homes and

environments that are less enriched (culturally and

physically). These differences in environment are what

cause differences in IQ.

Emotional Intelligence

According to John Mayer, it's the abilities to read others' emotions accurately, respond to them appropriately, motivate oneself, be aware of one's own emotions, and regulate and control one's won emotional responses. 4 branches, each measured by the MSCEIT: perceiving emotions, using emotions too facilitate thought, understanding emotions, and managing emotions. Considered by some to be a facet of personal intelligence Has adaptive advantages TERM 47

Mislabeled twins study

DEFINITION 47

Studied twins inappropriately labeled as the other kind.

The fraternal twins mislabeled as identical twins didn't

have a greater r; instead, their r was more similar to the

rightly labeled fraternal twins.

This too seems to suggest genetic influence.

TERM 48

Metacomponents vs. performance

components vs. knowledge acquisition

components

DEFINITION 48 According to Sternberg, the 3 components of the cognitive processes underlying intelligence Metacomponents: the higher-order processes used to plan and regulate task performance; underly fluid intelligence (e.g. problem-solving skills) Performance components: the actual mental processes used to perform the task (e.g. perception, retrieval from memory) Knowledge-acquisition components: allow us to learn from new experiences, store info in memory, and combine new with previously acquired info; underlie crystallized intelligence TERM 49

Analytical vs. practical vs. creative

intelligence

DEFINITION 49 The 3 different kinds of intelligence pronounced by Sternberg Analytical: the kinds of academically oriented problem-solving skills measured by traditional intelligence tests. Practical: the skills needed to cope with everyday demadns and to manage oneself and other people effectively. Creative: the mental skills needed to deal adaptively with novel problems.