




























































































Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The concept of subgroups in group theory, providing examples and theorems. It also covers the product of groups, the inner product, and matrix representations. based on a research paper from Roland Winkler and collaborators from NIU, Argonne, and NCTU, published between 2011 and 2015.
Typology: Slides
1 / 133
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Roland Winkler rwinkler@niu.edu
August 2011
(Lecture notes version: November 3, 2015)
Please, let me know if you find misprints, errors or inaccuracies in these notes. Thank you.
I (^) J. F. Cornwell, Group Theory in Physics (Academic, 1987) general introduction; discrete and continuous groups
I (^) W. Ludwig and C. Falter, Symmetries in Physics (Springer, Berlin, 1988). general introduction; discrete and continuous groups
I (^) W.-K. Tung, Group Theory in Physics (World Scientific, 1985). general introduction; main focus on continuous groups
I (^) L. M. Falicov, Group Theory and Its Physical Applications (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1966). small paperback; compact introduction
I (^) E. P. Wigner, Group Theory (Academic, 1959). classical textbook by the master
I (^) Landau and Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics, Ch. XII (Pergamon, 1977)
brief introduction into the main aspects of group theory in physics
I (^) R. McWeeny, Symmetry (Dover, 2002) elementary, self-contained introduction
I (^) and many others
A set G = {a, b, c,.. .} is called a group, if there exists a group multiplication connecting the elements in G in the following way
(1) a, b ∈ G : c = a b ∈ G (closure)
(2) a, b, c ∈ G : (ab)c = a(bc) (associativity)
(3) ∃ e ∈ G : a e = a ∀a ∈ G (identity / neutral element)
(4) ∀a ∈ G ∃ b ∈ G : a b = e, i.e., b ≡ a−^1 (inverse element)
(a) e−^1 = e
(b) a−^1 a = a a−^1 = e ∀a ∈ G (left inverse = right inverse)
(c) e a = a e = a ∀a ∈ G (left neutral = right neutral)
(d) ∀a, b ∈ G : c = a b ⇔ c−^1 = b−^1 a−^1
(5) ∀a, b ∈ G : a b = b a (commutatitivity)
Group theory is the natural language to describe symmetries of a physical system
I (^) symmetries correspond to conserved quantities
I (^) symmetries allow us to classify quantum mechanical states
I (^) evaluation of matrix elements ⇒ Wigner-Eckart theorem e.g., selection rules: dipole matrix elements for optical transitions
I (^) Hamiltonian ˆH must be invariant under the symmetries of a quantum system ⇒ construct ˆH via symmetry arguments
I (^)...
I (^) Lagrange function L(q, q˙),
I (^) Lagrange equations d dt
∂ q˙i
∂qi
i = 1,... , N
I (^) If for one j : ∂L ∂qj
= 0 ⇒ pj ≡
∂ q˙j
is a conserved quantity
I (^) qj linear coordinate
I (^) qj angular coordinate
Group theory provides systematic generalization of these statements
I (^) representation theory ≡ classification of how functions and operators transform under symmetry operations
I (^) Wigner-Eckart theorem ≡ statements on matrix elements if we know how the functions and operators transform under the symmetries of a system
I (^) Schr¨odinger equation Hˆψ = E ψ or iℏ∂t ψ = Hˆψ
I (^) Let ˆO with iℏ∂t Oˆ = [ Oˆ, Hˆ] = 0 ⇒ Oˆ is conserved quantity
⇒ eigenvalue equations Hˆψ = E ψ and ˆOψ = λ (^) Oˆ ψ can be solved simultaneously
⇒ eigenvalue λ (^) Oˆ of ˆO is good quantum number for ψ
2 2 m
∂r 2
r
∂r
2 mr 2
e^2 r
⇒ group SO(3)
⇒ [Lˆ^2 , Hˆ] = [Lˆz , Hˆ] = [Lˆ^2 , Lˆz ] = 0 ⇒ eigenstates ψnlm(r): index l ↔ Lˆ^2 , m ↔ ˆLz I (^) really another example for representation theory I (^) degeneracy for 0 ≤ l ≤ n − 1: dynamical symmetry (unique for H atom)
(ii) Phonons
I (^) Consider square lattice
by 90o
rotation
I (^) frequencies of modes are equal I (^) degeneracies for particular propagation directions
(iii) Theory of Invariants I (^) How can we construct models for the dynamics of electrons or phonons that are compatible with given crystal symmetries?
Physics at small length scales: strong interaction
Proton mp = 938.28 MeV
Neutron mn = 939.57 MeV
rest mass of nucleons almost equal ∼ degeneracy
I (^) Symmetry: isospin ˆI with [ˆI , Hˆstrong] = 0
I (^) SU(2): proton | 1212 〉, neutron | 12 − 12 〉
P 3 e a b c d f e e a b c d f a a b e f c d b b e a d f c c c d f e a b d d f c b e a f f c d a b e
I (^) Symmetry w.r.t. main diagonal ⇒ group is Abelian
I (^) order n of g ∈ G: smallest n > 0 with g n^ = e
I (^) {g , g 2 ,... , g n^ = e} with g ∈ G is Abelian subgroup (a cyclic group)
I (^) in every row / column every element appears exactly once because:
Rearrangement Lemma: for any fixed g ′^ ∈ G, we have G = {g ′g : g ∈ G} = {gg ′^ : g ∈ G} i.e., the latter sets consist of the elements in G rearranged in order. proof: g 1 6 = g 2 ⇔ g ′g 1 6 = g ′g 2 ∀g 1 , g 2 , g ′^ ∈ G
(1) Conjugate Elements and Classes
I (^) Let a ∈ G. Then b ∈ G is called conjugate to a if ∃ x ∈ G with b = x ax−^1.
Conjugation b ∼ a is equivalence relation:
} ⇒ a ∼ b transitive a^ =^ xcx
− (^1) ⇒ c = x− (^1) ax b = ycy −^1 = (xy −^1 )−^1 a(xy −^1 )
I (^) For fixed a, the set of all conjugate elements C = {x ax−^1 : x ∈ G} is called a class.
Example: P 3 x e a b c d f e e a b c d f a e a b d f c b e a b f c d c e b a c f d d e b a f d c f e b a d c f ⇒ classes {e}, {a, b}, {c, d, f }
(3) Invariant Subgroups and Factor Groups
connection: classes and cosets I (^) A subgroup U ⊂ G containing only complete classes of G is called invariant subgroup (aka normal subgroup). I (^) Let U be an invariant subgroup of G and x ∈ G ⇔ x Ux−^1 = U ⇔ x U = Ux (left coset = right coset) I (^) Multiplication of cosets of an invariant subgroup U ⊂ G: x, y ∈ G : (x U) (y U) = xy U = z U where z = xy
well-defined: (x U) (y U) = x (U y ) U = xy U U = z U U = z U I (^) An invariant subgroup U ⊂ G and the distinct cosets x U form a group, called factor group F = G/U
e a b c d f e e a b c d f a a b e f c d b b e a d f c c c d f e a b d d f c b e a f f c d a b e
invariant subgroup U = {e, a, b}
⇒ one coset cU = dU = f U = {c, d, f }
factor group P 3 /U = {U, cU} U cU U U cU cU cU U
I (^) We can think of factor groups G/U as coarse-grained versions of G.
I (^) Often, factor groups G/U are a helpful intermediate step when working out the structure of more complicated groups G.
I (^) Thus: invariant subgroups are “more useful” subgroups than other subgroups.