Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Comparing Frequentist and Bayesian Approaches to Probabilities and Statistics, Slides of Statistics

An introduction to probabilities and statistics, focusing on the Frequentist and Bayesian approaches. The authors discuss the replication crisis in science and the issues with Frequentist statistics, including p-hacking, data dredging, and significance chasing. They then explain the Bayesian approach, which uses subjective belief and updates beliefs with new information. The document also includes a comparison of the two approaches and their benefits.

What you will learn

  • Why has the replication crisis occurred in science?
  • What are the main differences between the Frequentist and Bayesian approaches to statistics?
  • What are the benefits of using Bayesian statistics instead of Frequentist statistics?
  • What are some issues with Frequentist statistics?
  • How does Bayesian statistics use subjective belief to update beliefs with new information?

Typology: Slides

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

myas
myas 🇬🇧

5

(9)

216 documents

1 / 23

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Introduction to
Probabilities, Bayesian and
Frequentist Statistics
Moutoshi Pal, Lica Iwaki & Carolin Lingl
Research Methods in Clinical Psychology
October 30, 2019
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17

Partial preview of the text

Download Comparing Frequentist and Bayesian Approaches to Probabilities and Statistics and more Slides Statistics in PDF only on Docsity!

Introduction to

Probabilities, Bayesian and

Frequentist Statistics

Moutoshi Pal, Lica Iwaki & Carolin Lingl Research Methods in Clinical Psychology October 30, 2019

Outline of the Presentation

**1. Quick summary of the paper

  1. The Frequentist approach
  2. Misconceptions of the p-value
  3. The Bayesian approach
  4. Benefits of Bayesian Statistics
  5. Comparison of the two approaches**

2. Frequentist Statistics

Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)

"surely the most bone-headedly misguided procedure

ever institutionalized in the rote training of science

students" (Rozeboom, 1997, p. 335).

Issues with Frequentist Statistics

● p-hacking

● Data dredging

● Significance chasing

● Optional stopping (a.k.a. data peaking )

● QPRs (questionable research practices)

Definition of the p-value

A p -value is the probability of the observed data, or more

extreme data, under the assumption that the null hypothesis

is true.

2. Frequentist Statistics

Definition of the p-value

A p -value is the probability of the observed data, or more

extreme data, under the assumption that the null hypothesis

is true.

2. Frequentist Statistics

Definition of the p-value

A p -value is the probability of the observed data, or more

extreme data, under the assumption that the null hypothesis

is true.

2. Frequentist Statistics

Now it’s time

for… a Kahoot

Quiz!!

3. Misconceptions of the p-value

The difference

Recall, Frequentist’s definition of p-value:

“The p -value is the probability of the observed data, or more extreme

data, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true.”

****Emphasis: the p-value is not the probability of a theory or hypothesis, but the probability of the observed data given the hypothesis

P(D|Ho)

The difference

Bayesian approach : probability is an expression of a degree of belief of an event, based on prior knowledge (i.e. previous experiments) or personal beliefs

The p- value is the probability of the hypothesis given the data

P(Ho|D)

P(D|Ho) ≠ P(Ho|D)

Frequentist Bayesian

The probability of the observed data/result given that some hypothesis is true is NOT equivalent to the probability that a hypothesis is true given that some data/result has been observed.

Bayesian Statistics

● Uses the idea of updating beliefs with new information when testing a hypothesis

● Start with a belief about how something works (i.e. “eating sushi is dangerous”)

Prior beliefs x Bayes’ Factor = Posterior belief (= updated, new belief)

Bayes’ Factor : represents the amount of information that we’ve learned about our hypotheses form the data

● Criticism: prior belief can be different from person to person ○ Includes subjective “beliefs” in calculation (subjective, not objective)

Bayesian Statistics

Prior DistributionLikelihood gives the function of a parameter given the data ● Data

Comparison of Frequentist Statistics & Bayesian

Frequentist

  1. Parameters are fixed but unknown and data are random
  2. Probability is a measure of frequency of repeated events

Bayesian

  1. Parameters are random and data are fixed
  2. Probability is a degree of certainty about values

Comparison of Frequentist Statistics & Bayesian

Frequentist

Confidence Interval : “there is a 95% probability that when I compute a confidence interval from data of this sort, the true value of θ will fall within it”.

Bayesian Credible Interval: “given our observed data (posterior distribution), there is a 95% probability that the true value of θ falls within the credible region”