Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

JPS into to criminal justice final | JPS 101 - Introduction Criminal Justice, Quizzes of Criminal Law

Class: JPS 101 - Introduction Criminal Justice; Subject: Justice and Policy Studies; University: Guilford College; Term: Fall 2010;

Typology: Quizzes

2009/2010

Uploaded on 12/10/2010

guilcogal
guilcogal 🇺🇸

3 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
TERM 1
Ring vs Arizona
DEFINITION 1
in cases where the death penalty is at stake the jury not the
judge decides on the existence of aggravating factors.
TERM 2
Kent Vs. United States
DEFINITION 2
in juvenile cases the juvenile is entitl ed to: 1. a hearing in the
matter of waiver of jurisdiction 2. Assis tance of counsel in a
hearing of waiver of jurisdiction 3. defe nse counsel must have
access to all social records 4. judge's d ecision in waiver hearing
must contain a statement that is ba sed on a full investigation
including the reason for the waiver.
TERM 3
In Re Gault
DEFINITION 3
Extended the due process rights of notification of charges,
right to confront witnesses, right against self incrimination,
and the right to counsel.
TERM 4
Breed vs Jones
DEFINITION 4
attached double jeopardy to cases where juveniles are
adjudicated in juvenile court and then waived to criminal
court
TERM 5
Schall v. Martin
DEFINITION 5
preventative detention is permissible if there is adequate
concern that future crimes will be committed, although the
juvenile has ta right to a hearing on detention.
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download JPS into to criminal justice final | JPS 101 - Introduction Criminal Justice and more Quizzes Criminal Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Ring vs Arizona

in cases where the death penalty is at stake the jury not the judge decides on the existence of aggravating factors. TERM 2

Kent Vs. United States

DEFINITION 2 in juvenile cases the juvenile is entitled to: 1. a hearing in the matter of waiver of jurisdiction 2. Assistance of counsel in a hearing of waiver of jurisdiction 3. defense counsel must have access to all social records 4. judge's decision in waiver hearing must contain a statement that is based on a full investigation including the reason for the waiver. TERM 3

In Re Gault

DEFINITION 3 Extended the due process rights of notification of charges, right to confront witnesses, right against self incrimination, and the right to counsel. TERM 4

Breed vs Jones

DEFINITION 4 attached double jeopardy to cases where juveniles are adjudicated in juvenile court and then waived to criminal court TERM 5

Schall v. Martin

DEFINITION 5 preventative detention is permissible if there is adequate concern that future crimes will be committed, although the juvenile has ta right to a hearing on detention.

New Jersey vs. TLO

the warrant less search of a student by school authorities is permissible based on reasonable suspicion that school rules have been violated. TERM 7

Gideon vs. Wainwright

DEFINITION 7 poor defendant charged with felonies have the right to court appointed counsel. TERM 8

U.S vs. Salerno

DEFINITION 8 Upheld the denial of bail for purposes of preventative detention TERM 9

Batson vs. Kentucky

DEFINITION 9 the use of peremptory challenges may be used to excluded jurors based solely on their race TERM 10

Cooper vs Pate

DEFINITION 10 state inmates have the standing to sue in federal court to address their grievances under the civil rights act of 1871