

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An order from the madras high court regarding a revision petition filed by s.mukanchand bothra against the judgment of the fast track court iv in chennai, challenging the compensation ordered in a case under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act. The case involved respondents rajiv gandhi memorial educational charitable trust and three individuals. The petitioner argued that inadequate compensation was ordered, but the question of whether the proviso to section 372 cr.p.c. Applies in complaint cases is pending decision. Since appeals have been filed by the accused, the revision was disposed of with an observation that the appellate court could also consider the question of adequate compensation.
Typology: Summaries
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Crl.R.C.No.551 of 2015
S.Mukanchand Bothra ... Petitioner
vs.
1.Rajiv Gandhi Memorial Educational Charitable Trust, Rep. By its trustees accused 2 to 8 36, Anjaneyar Koil Street, Chennai 600 056.
2.R.Anbarasu 3.P.Mani 4.Mrs.A.Kamala ... Respondents
Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 Cr.P.C.,r/w 401 to enhance the compensation
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mukanchand Bothra
For Respondents : Mr.R.Vivekananthan
O R D E R
S.Mukanchand Bothra vs Rajiv Gandhi Memorial ... on 19 January, 2016
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/86049285/ 1
S.Mukanchand Bothra vs Rajiv Gandhi Memorial ... on 19 January, 2016
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/86049285/ 2