Download Late Career Practitioner Policy and more Slides Nursing in PDF only on Docsity!
This policy applies to:
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford
Last Approval Date: Aug 2017
Name of Policy: SHC/LPCHS Late Career Practitioner Policy
Departments Affected: Page^1 of^5
All Medical Staff
This document is intended for use by staff of Stanford Hospital & Clinics and/or Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital. No representations or warranties are made for outside use. Not for outside reproduction or publication without permission.
I. PURPOSE Clinical excellence is a complex composite of performance in many domains, including, among
others, cognitive ability, technical proficiency, communication skills, professional judgment, productivity, and stamina. As individuals age, both the natural aging process and specific medical
conditions and medications have the potential to adversely affect the capacity of practitioners to carry out their clinical responsibilities. Given this reality, it is imperative, from the point of view of
patient sa performance and capacities can be fairly and accurately evaluated. The purpose of this policy is tofety as well as physician well-being to establish a process by which late career clinicians’
establish this evaluation process.
Key elements of this policy practitioner and to address issues that the individual may not recognize. are to assure high quality care for the patient, to be supportive of the
The Medical Staff of Stanford Stanford (LPCHS) adopt this policy in order to: Health Care (SHC) and Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital
- • Provide patients with medical care of high quality and safety and protect them from harmIdentify issues that may be pertinent to the health and clinical practice of medical staff
members
- • Support members of the medical staffApply evaluation criteria objectively, equitably, respectfully, and confidentially
II. SCOPE This policy applies to all members of, and applicants to, the Medical Staff of Stanford
Health Care anyone in the (SHC) Affiliate Category, and Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford (LPCH Refer and Follow Category (LPCHS), and Sthe) excluding
Administrative Category supersedes any previous policy in this area. (SHC). This amendment is effective August 2017 and
III. POLICY Any practitioner aged 74 ½ or older who applies for appointment to the Medical Staff
will complete, as a part of the application process, a peer clinical skills assessment and health screening that address his/her capacity to competently perform the clinical
privileges requested. Physicians who ar older will be asked to complete these assessments every 2 years. In addition, thee currently on the medical staff who are 75 or
SHC request that any practitioner regardless of age/LPCHS Credentials and Privileging Committee (“Credentials Committee”), may complete this skills assessment and these
screenings.
The clinical skills assessment and that the practitioner has no detected problem health screening described in this policy must indicate(s) that might interfere with the safe and
effective provision o or currently in effect (for current members of the medical staff). Adverse findings thatf care permitted with the clinical privileges requested (for applicants)
This policy applies to:
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford
Last Approval Date: Aug 2017
Name of Policy: SHC/LPCHS Late Career Practitioner Policy
Departments Affected: Page^2 of^5
All Medical Staff
This document is intended for use by staff of Stanford Hospital & Clinics and/or Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital. No representations or warranties are made for outside use. Not for outside reproduction or publication without permission.
indicate potential interference with the safe and effective provision of care with the clinical privileges requested (for applicants) or currently in effect (for current members of
the medical staff) will be assessed along with other pertinent factors by the applicable Service Chief and Credentials Committee in formulating their recommendations
re Committee [hereafter MEC] as provided in the SHCgarding appointment and clinical privileges to the applicable Medical Executive/LPCHS Medical Staff Bylaws. The
Service Chief/Credentials Committee has the right to request additional information for further evaluation, if necessary.
IV. PROCEDURE A. Components of the assessment: For any practitioner aged 74 ½ or older at the time of his/her
application for appointment or who is otherwise asked by the Credentials Committee to undergo evaluation (including the biennial assessment of current members of the medical
staff aged 75 or older), the Medical Staff Services Department will notify the practitioner of the assessment and screenings required by this policy. These are as follows:
1. A peer assessment of the applican members, trainees, advanced practice professionals, nurses and other hospitalt’s clinical performance by medical staff
staff The applicable Service Ch who are in a position to evaluate the applicant’s clinical performance.ief will identify the individuals to conduct the
assessment Services Department and forward them directly or designee. A modified version of the to the Director of Medical Clinical Staff
Excellence Core Competencies Evaluation will be used for this purpose (Appendix A). The Medical Staff Services Department will directly contact
each of the form. individuals selected to request that they complete the evaluation
A comprehensive history and physical examination, to be arranged and paid for by the practitioner using the forms provided in Appendix B. The practitioner being
evaluated must provide the name of the evaluating physician in advance. The Director of Medical Staff Services Department or designee in consultation with
the chair of the Cr H&P. edentials Committee will approve the provider performing the
B. Notification to the practitioner will include:
1. The required elements of the evaluation (Appendices A and B)
2. The request for the name of the physician of choice for the and the date when that name in addition to email address and phone number health screening
must be submitted to the Medical Staff Services Department
This policy applies to:
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford
Last Approval Date: Aug 2017
Name of Policy: SHC/LPCHS Late Career Practitioner Policy
Departments Affected: Page^4 of^5
All Medical Staff
This document is intended for use by staff of Stanford Hospital & Clinics and/or Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital. No representations or warranties are made for outside use. Not for outside reproduction or publication without permission.
p of which would be determined by the MEC upon recommendation of itsroctoring of the practitioner’s clinical performance, the scope and duration
Credentials Committee, with input from the Service Chief. Specific findings that would identify potential concerns include low ratings (ratings less than
3) significant health issues that would interfere with the ability to practice on any Clinical Excellence Core Competencies Evaluation form or
medicine in the physician’s specialty. The complete evaluation/findings be maintained by the Medical Staff Services Department. will
a. If the Credentials Committee concludes that the practitioner is able to safely and competently perform the privileges requested, not
either after the initial evaluation or after undergoing fur evaluation as in C.3 or D.2 above, a representative of the committeether
and/or the Chief of Staff will discuss alternative practice patterns or modification of requested (SHC) or Medical Staff President (LPCHS)
privileges, including the possibility of re the practitioner. The goal of such discussion is to be supportive and vocation of privileges, with
respectful of the practitioner and to suggest resources to assist the practitioner.
b. If the committee recommends modification, restriction or revocation of clinical privileges to the MEC, and if that recommendation is
approved by the MEC, the practitioner may request a hearing under the Medical Staff Bylaws.
V. Throughout this process practitioner and assist in any resulting changes in practice patterns or transitions. This process is, the intent of each step is to protect patient safety, provide support, to the
also available to individual practitioners who, on their own, express concerns. Inquiries by such practitioners should be directed to the Chief of Staff (SHC) or Medical Staff President (LPCHS)
or designee.
VI. • APPENDICES Appendix A – Clinical Core Competencies Evaluation
- Appendix Form B – History and Physical Examination: General Information and Attestation DOCUMENT INFORMATION A. Author/Original Date – June 2012 B. Gatekeeper of Original Document Director, Medical Staff Services C. Distribution and Training Requirements
This policy applies to:
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford
Last Approval Date: Aug 2017
Name of Policy: SHC/LPCHS Late Career Practitioner Policy
Departments Affected: Page^5 of^5
All Medical Staff
This document is intended for use by staff of Stanford Hospital & Clinics and/or Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital. No representations or warranties are made for outside use. Not for outside reproduction or publication without permission.
- This policy resides in the Medical Staff Policy Manual of SHC. D. Review and Renewal Requirements This policy will be reviewed and/or revised every three years or as required by change of law or practice. F. Approvals SHC and LPCHS MEC July 2012, LPCHS MEC Aug 2012, Aug,2014, Aug 2017 SHC and LPCH SHC Board OctoSber 2013 Board July 2012, Aug 2017, Aug 2014, Aug, 2017 LPCHS Board August 2014
Form Revised 19 May 2014
Page
2 of 4
*COMMENTS ARE REQUIRED for ratings of “Significant Concern” or “Minor Concern”
ationally)r ion l)lya intoa nr ollya inog er
Significant Concern^ (comment required) Significant Concern^ (comment required)
**Minor Concern ***^ **(comment required) Minor Concern ***^ (comment required)
(basic Average professional competence) (basic Average professional competence)
expected at top( Excellent academic medical center expected at top( Excellent academic medical center
Outstanding^ (widely recognized locally, Outstanding^ (widely recognized locally,
o n g
Not applicable or don’tknow Not applicable or don’tknow
GENERALCLINICALPROFICIENCY Maintains up-to-date knowledgebase appropriate to scope of practiceMaintains currenttechnical/procedural proficiencyApplies sound diagnostic reasoningand judgmentApplies sound therapeutic reasoningand judgmentApplies evidence from relevantscientific studiesSeeks consultation from other careproviders when appropriateDemonstrates reliability in meetingclinical commitments COMMUNICATION Communicates effectively withpatients and their familiesCommunicates effectively withphysician peersCommunicates effectively withtrainees
COMMENTS (REQUIRED for ratings of ”Significant Concern” or ”Minor Concern”) If applicable, please describe specific observed performance orbehavior that influenced your assessment. Describe history andfrequency of this performance or behavior, including any trendtoward improvement or worsening over time. Continue on backor separate sheet if necessary. COMMENTS (REQUIRED for ratings of ”Significant Concern” or “Minor Concern”) If applicable, please describe specific observed performance orbehavior that influenced your assessment. Describe history andfrequency of this performance or behavior, including any trendtoward improvement or worsening over time. Continue on backor separate sheet if necessary.
Form Revised 19 May 2014
Page
3 of 4
*COMMENTS ARE REQUIRED for ratings of “Significant Concern” or “Minor Concern”
l)lya intoa nr ollya inog er
Significant Concern*^ (comment required)
**Minor Concern ***^ (comment required)
(basic Average professional competence)
expected at top( Excellent academic medical center
Outstanding^ (widely recognized locally,
Not applicable or don’tknow
Communicates effectively withother members of the health careteam (for example, nurses, clinicaladministrators, respiratorytherapists, pharmacists)Maintains appropriate medicaldocumentation PROFESSIONALISM Treats patients with compassion andrespect
COMMENTS (REQUIRED for ratings of ”Significant Concern” or “Minor Concern”) If applicable, please describe specific observed performance orbehavior that influenced your assessment. Describe history andfrequency of this performance or behavior, including any trendtoward improvement or worsening over time. Continue on backor separate sheet if necessary.
Serves as patient advocate (puts thepatient first)
Shows sensitivity to cultural issues
Treats physician peers with respect
Treats trainees with respect
Treats other members of the healthcare team (for example, nurses,clinical administrators, respiratorytherapists, pharmacists) with respect
Available to colleagues
Responds in a timely manner
Respects patient confidentiality
KMG Page 1 1/11/
Appendix B History and Physical Examination for Late Career Practitioners
NOTE TO THE EXAMINING PHYSICIAN: The Medical Staff of Stanford Hospital and Clinics, as a part of their efforts to protect both patients and practitioners, require a comprehensive history and physical examination ofpractitioners applying or reapplying for clinical privileges beyond a certain age. Important components of this assessment include a review of systems that addresses functional status, and comprehensive sensory examinations including tests of hearing, visual acuity with eye chart and exam, and a thorough neurological exam. The elements of the examination should be modified as appropriate to address the age, clinical condition, medical problems and theclinical privileges requested by the practitioner. Therefore, please be sure to review the practitioner’s requested privileges before conducting your examination. In order to respect the confidentiality of the practitioner’s medical information, please submitexamination to the relevant Medical Staff office. only the form attached to this document when sending the results of your As noted on the form, the Medical Staff is only interested in, and should only receive a detailed report on, those aspects of the practitioner’s health, if any, that have the potential to adversely affect the practitioner’s ability to safely perform the requested privileges, or that document his/her ability to do so. You may supply additional information that you feel would be helpful to the Medical Staffin this assessment.
Practitioner’s Name: ____________________________________________________ Requested Clinical Privileges: See attached Clinical Privileges Delineation Checklist
KMG Page 2 1/11/
History and Physical Attestation Form I attest that I have performed a comprehensive history and physical examination on this practitioner, and that I have reviewed the clinical privileges requested by this practitioner. In the history and physical examination the practitioner has no apparent findings that would necessarily preclude him/her from performing the privileges requested. Agree: ______ Disagree: ______ If disagree, please elaborate below
In tests and studies performed on this practitioner, he/she has no apparent findings that would necessarily preclude him/her from performing the privileges requested. Agree : ______ Disagree: ______ If disagree, please elaborate below
Do you have any recommendations for further study or evaluation? No: ______ Yes: ______ If yes, please elaborate below
Additional Comments:
Name: _________________________________________ Specialty: _________________ Signature : _______________________________________ Date : ___________________
Please Fax the completed form to: 650-725-