

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An overview of five common fallacies in argumentation: ad hominem, appeal to popularity, slippery slope, tu quoque, and generalization. Ad hominem is a fallacy in which the arguer attacks the opponent instead of the argument. Appeal to popularity is a fallacy in which the arguer makes a point based on popular beliefs. Slippery slope is a fallacy in which the arguer creates a chain of unlikely events. Tu quoque is a fallacy in which the arguer argues that an action is acceptable because others do it. Generalization is a fallacy in which one conclusion is asserted on a general group. References are provided for each fallacy.
What you will learn
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Lauren Morgan (#4)
Elements of Arguments and Fallacies
1 Ad Hominem Fallacy in which the arguer attacks the opponent instead of attacking the argument of the opponent (Elements of arguments, 2016).
("Common Fallacies in Argumentation", 2019) 2 Appeal to Popularity
Fallacy in which the arguer makes his point upon popular beliefs that are widely accepted (Elements of arguments, 2016).
(Ad populum, 2017) 3 Slippery Slope
Fallacy in which the arguer makes a chain of events that are highly unlike to occur if the first one does (Elements of arguments, 2016)
(Slippery Slope of Americans' Mindsets, 1970) 4 Tu Quoque Fallacy in which the arguer argues because others do something, it is therefore acceptable to do (Elements of arguments, 2016).
(The 'Tu Quoque' Fallacy – Some more thoughts on Commission v Google, 2013) 5 Generalization Fallacy in which the arguer asserts one conclusion on a general group (Elements of arguments, 2016).
(Hasty Generalization, 2019)
References
Ad populum. (2017). Retrieved August 22, 2019, from http://trulyfallacious.com/logic/logical-
fallacies/relevance/ad-populum
Crihfield, S. (2016). AS Level AICE Global Perspectives. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from
http://shshistory.com/as_global.html
Common Fallacies in Argumentation. (n.d.). Retrieved August 22, 2019, from
https://codygrames.weebly.com/pols1100subpage-b.html
Lamadrid, A., & Colomo, P. I. (2013, February 08). The 'Tu Quoque' Fallacy – Some more
thoughts on Commission v Google. Retrieved August 22, 2019, from
https://chillingcompetition.com/2013/02/08/the-tu-quoque-fallacy-some-more-thoughts-
on-commission-v-google/
Lawhorn, D. (1970, January 01). Slippery Slope of Americans' Mindsets. Retrieved August 22,
2019, from http://eng11249.blogspot.com/2016/04/slippery-slope-of-americans-
mindsets.html
Sampson, L. (n.d.). Hasty Generalization. Retrieved August 22, 2019, from
https://rampages.us/lsampson/2014/10/03/hasty-generalization/